186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29617073)
1. Changes observed in prostate biopsy practices in an inner city hospital with a high risk patient population following the 2012 uspstf psa screening recommendations.
Tam AW; Khusid J; Inoyatov I; Becerra AZ; Davila J; Chouhan JD; Weiss JP; Hyacinthe LM; McNeil BK; Winer AG
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(4):697-703. PubMed ID: 29617073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force statement on prostate-specific antigen screening: analysis of urologic and primary care practices.
Perez TY; Danzig MR; Ghandour RA; Badani KK; Benson MC; McKiernan JM
Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 25440819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Screening Trials and Revised PSA Screening Guidelines on Rates of Prostate Biopsy and Postbiopsy Complications.
Gershman B; Van Houten HK; Herrin J; Moreira DM; Kim SP; Shah ND; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Jan; 71(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 26995328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate Needle Biopsy Outcomes in the Era of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation against Prostate Specific Antigen Based Screening.
Banerji JS; Wolff EM; Massman JD; Odem-Davis K; Porter CR; Corman JM
J Urol; 2016 Jan; 195(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 26254722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. US Preventive Services Task Force prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines result in higher Gleason score diagnoses.
Gejerman G; Ciccone P; Goldstein M; Lanteri V; Schlecker B; Sanzone J; Esposito M; Rome S; Ciccone M; Margolis E; Simon R; Guo Y; Pentakota SR; Sadeghi-Nejad H
Investig Clin Urol; 2017 Nov; 58(6):423-428. PubMed ID: 29124241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against prostate specific antigen screening on prostate biopsy and cancer detection rates.
Bhindi B; Mamdani M; Kulkarni GS; Finelli A; Hamilton RJ; Trachtenberg J; Zlotta AR; Evans A; van der Kwast TH; Toi A; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2015 May; 193(5):1519-24. PubMed ID: 25481037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
; Grossman DC; Curry SJ; Owens DK; Bibbins-Domingo K; Caughey AB; Davidson KW; Doubeni CA; Ebell M; Epling JW; Kemper AR; Krist AH; Kubik M; Landefeld CS; Mangione CM; Silverstein M; Simon MA; Siu AL; Tseng CW
JAMA; 2018 May; 319(18):1901-1913. PubMed ID: 29801017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014.
Misra-Hebert AD; Hu B; Klein EA; Stephenson A; Taksler GB; Kattan MW; Rothberg MB
BJU Int; 2017 Aug; 120(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 28139034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in the outcome of prostate biopsies after preventive task force recommendation against prostate-specific antigen screening.
Zakaria AS; Dragomir A; Brimo F; Kassouf W; Tanguay S; Aprikian A
BMC Urol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):69. PubMed ID: 30126402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary care physician PSA screening practices before and after the final U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.
Cohn JA; Wang CE; Lakeman JC; Silverstein JC; Brendler CB; Novakovic KR; McGuire MS; Helfand BT
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):41.e23-30. PubMed ID: 23911680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with USPSTF screening recommendations at a community-based urology practice.
Gaylis FD; Choi JE; Hamilton Z; Dato P; Cohen E; Calabrese R; Prime H; Rosenbaum A; Kader AK
Urol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):663.e1-663.e7. PubMed ID: 28736250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metastatic prostate cancer incidence in Australia after amendment to prostate-specific antigen screening guidelines.
Smith S; Wolanski P
ANZ J Surg; 2018; 88(7-8):E589-E593. PubMed ID: 29194902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inverse stage migration patterns in North American patients undergoing local prostate cancer treatment: a contemporary population-based update in light of the 2012 USPSTF recommendations.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Karakiewicz PI; Pompe RS; Preisser F; Zaffuto E; Dell'Oglio P; Briganti A; Nafez O; Fisch M; Steuber T; Graefen M; Budäus L
World J Urol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):469-479. PubMed ID: 29992380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PSA screening, prostate biopsy, and treatment of prostate cancer in the years surrounding the USPSTF recommendation against prostate cancer screening.
Kearns JT; Holt SK; Wright JL; Lin DW; Lange PH; Gore JL
Cancer; 2018 Jul; 124(13):2733-2739. PubMed ID: 29781117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rates of clinically significant prostate cancer in African Americans increased significantly following the 2012 US Preventative Services Task Force recommendation against prostate specific antigen screening: A Single Institution Retrospective Study.
Arace J; Flores V; Monaghan T; Robins D; Karanikolas N; Winer A; Weiss J
Int J Clin Pract; 2020 Feb; 74(2):e13447. PubMed ID: 31750596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration.
Master VA; Chi T; Simko JP; Weinberg V; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793. PubMed ID: 16217288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA.
Fleshner K; Carlsson SV; Roobol MJ
Nat Rev Urol; 2017 Jan; 14(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 27995937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate cancer screening practices and diagnoses in patients age 50 and older, Southeastern Michigan, pre/post 2012.
Rezaee ME; Ward CE; Odom BD; Pollock M
Prev Med; 2016 Jan; 82():73-6. PubMed ID: 26592690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
