419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29617839)
1. Outcomes of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement in obese patients.
Welp HA; Herlemann I; Martens S; Deschka H
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 29617839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do obese patients benefit from isolated aortic valve replacement through a partial upper sternotomy?
Xie XB; Dai XF; Qiu ZH; Jiang DB; Wu QS; Dong Y; Chen LW
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Aug; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 35922828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy.
Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Via Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy: Propensity Matched Initial Experience.
Seitz M; Goldblatt J; Paul E; Marcus T; Larobina M; Yap CH
Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Feb; 28(2):320-326. PubMed ID: 29291961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.
Kirmani BH; Jones SG; Malaisrie SC; Chung DA; Williams RJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD011793. PubMed ID: 28394022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Partial upper re-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement or re-replacement after previous cardiac surgery.
Byrne JG; Karavas AN; Adams DH; Aklog L; Aranki SF; Couper GS; Rizzo RJ; Cohn LH
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2000 Sep; 18(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 10973536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: A real-world multi-institutional analysis.
Ghanta RK; Lapar DJ; Kern JA; Kron IL; Speir AM; Fonner E; Quader M; Ailawadi G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1060-5. PubMed ID: 25680751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Propensity score analysis of outcomes following minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement.
Shehada SE; Öztürk Ö; Wottke M; Lange R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Feb; 49(2):464-9; discussion 469-70. PubMed ID: 25732967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients.
Furukawa N; Kuss O; Aboud A; Schönbrodt M; Renner A; Hakim Meibodi K; Becker T; Zittermann A; Gummert JF; Börgermann J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Aug; 46(2):221-6; discussion 226-7. PubMed ID: 24446478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-sutureless minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: mini-sternotomy versus mini-thoracotomy: a series of 1130 patients.
Fattouch K; Moscarelli M; Del Giglio M; Albertini A; Comoglio C; Coppola R; Nasso G; Speziale G
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 23(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 27160409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Manubrium-limited sternotomy decreases blood loss after aortic valve replacement surgery.
Burdett CL; Lage IB; Goodwin AT; White RW; Khan KJ; Owens WA; Kendall SW; Ferguson JI; Dunning J; Akowuah EF
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Oct; 19(4):605-10. PubMed ID: 24944150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved operative and recovery times with mini-thoracotomy aortic valve replacement.
Olds A; Saadat S; Azzolini A; Dombrovskiy V; Odroniec K; Lemaire A; Ghaly A; Lee LY
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 May; 14(1):91. PubMed ID: 31072356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. J-Shaped Upper Mini-Sternotomy Versus Full Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comparative Study.
Borrero Á; Samboni TJ; Prado N; Carrillo-Gómez DC; Giraldo-Gonzalez GC; Florez-Elvira L; Cadavid-Alvear E
Heart Surg Forum; 2020 Jun; 23(4):E411-E415. PubMed ID: 32726224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mini-Bentall: An Interesting Approach for Selected Patients.
Mikus E; Micari A; Calvi S; Salomone M; Panzavolta M; Paris M; Del Giglio M
Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 28129319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of a minimally invasive approach on reoperative aortic valve replacement.
Gosev I; Neely RC; Leacche M; McGurk S; Kaneko T; Zeljko D; Loberman D; Javed Q; Cohn LH; Aranki SF
J Heart Valve Dis; 2015 Mar; 24(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 26204682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial clinical experience with minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement.
Abjigitova D; Veen KM; Mokhles MM; Bekkers JA; Oei FB; Bogers AJ
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2021 Jun; 62(3):268-277. PubMed ID: 33302611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mini-Stern Trial: A randomized trial comparing mini-sternotomy to full median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.
Nair SK; Sudarshan CD; Thorpe BS; Singh J; Pillay T; Catarino P; Valchanov K; Codispoti M; Dunning J; Abu-Omar Y; Moorjani N; Matthews C; Freeman CJ; Fox-Rushby JA; Sharples LD
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Dec; 156(6):2124-2132.e31. PubMed ID: 30075959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
