155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29617884)
1. Rituximab versus the modified Ponticelli regimen in the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy: a Health Economic Model.
Hamilton P; Kanigicherla D; Venning M; Brenchley P; Meads D
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2018 Dec; 33(12):2145-2155. PubMed ID: 29617884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immunosuppressive therapy for progressive idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis in China.
Xu W; Zhang Z; Li D; Dai W; Pan C; Guo M; Zhao Y; Cui X
BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Apr; 23(1):361. PubMed ID: 37046255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rituximab for the first-line treatment of stage III-IV follicular lymphoma (review of Technology Appraisal No. 110): a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Papaioannou D; Rafia R; Rathbone J; Stevenson M; Buckley Woods H; Stevens J
Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(37):1-253, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 23021127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of rituximab for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: an evidence review of the submission from Roche.
Main C; Pitt M; Moxham T; Stein K
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(Suppl. 2):27-32. PubMed ID: 21047488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic evaluation of rituximab in addition to standard of care chemotherapy for adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Nam J; Milenkovski R; Yunger S; Geirnaert M; Paulson K; Seftel M
J Med Econ; 2018 Jan; 21(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 28837377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rituximab (MabThera) for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Knight C; Hind D; Brewer N; Abbott V
Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(37):iii, ix-xi, 1-82. PubMed ID: 15361313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of rituximab in combination with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the UK.
Ray JA; Carr E; Lewis G; Marcus R
Value Health; 2010; 13(4):346-57. PubMed ID: 20070643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness results from the randomised, Phase IIB trial in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia to compare fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone and low-dose rituximab: the Attenuated dose Rituximab with ChemoTherapy In Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ARCTIC) trial.
Howard DR; Munir T; McParland L; Rawstron AC; Chalmers A; Gregory WM; O'Dwyer JL; Smith A; Longo R; Varghese A; Smith A; Hillmen P
Health Technol Assess; 2017 May; 21(28):1-374. PubMed ID: 28628003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rituximab or cyclosporine a for the treatment of membranous nephropathy: Economic evaluation of the MENTOR trial.
Kadatz M; Klarenbach S; So H; Fervenza FC; Cattran DC; Barbour SJ
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38621719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids versus Modified Ponticelli regimen in treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: Randomized control trial.
Ramachandran R; Hn HK; Kumar V; Nada R; Yadav AK; Goyal A; Kumar V; Rathi M; Jha V; Gupta KL; Sakhuja V; Kohli HS
Nephrology (Carlton); 2016 Feb; 21(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 26205759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy and cost of different treatment in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Dai P; Xie W; Yu X; Sun J; Wang S; Kawuki J
Int Immunopharmacol; 2021 May; 94():107376. PubMed ID: 33582591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Garside R; Pitt M; Anderson R; Rogers G; Dyer M; Mealing S; Somerville M; Price A; Stein K
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Nov; 11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. PubMed ID: 17999840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A systematic review and economic model of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplantation in children.
Yao G; Albon E; Adi Y; Milford D; Bayliss S; Ready A; Raftery J; Taylor RS
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Dec; 10(49):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-157. PubMed ID: 17134597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of rituximab in addition to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (R-FC) for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Müller D; Fischer K; Kaiser P; Eichhorst B; Walshe R; Reiser M; Kellermann L; Borsi L; Civello D; Mensch A; Bahlo J; Hallek M; Stock S; Fingerle-Rowson G
Leuk Lymphoma; 2016 May; 57(5):1130-9. PubMed ID: 26584689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combination therapy with rituximab, low-dose cyclophosphamide, and prednisone for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a case series.
Cortazar FB; Leaf DE; Owens CT; Laliberte K; Pendergraft WF; Niles JL
BMC Nephrol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 28143416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bendamustine-rituximab: a cost-utility analysis in first-line treatment of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in England and Wales.
Dewilde S; Woods B; Castaigne JG; Parker C; Dunlop W
J Med Econ; 2014 Feb; 17(2):111-24. PubMed ID: 24308372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Economic evaluation of rituximab added to fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia].
Casado LF; García Marco JA; Gilsanz F; González M; Ríos E; de la Serna J; Urbano A; Vicente V; Rubio-Terrés C; Castro AJ
Gac Sanit; 2011; 25(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 21664727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic evaluation of intensive chemotherapy with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for patients with high-risk early breast cancer in Japan.
Ishiguro H; Kondo M; Hoshi SL; Takada M; Nakamura S; Teramukai S; Yanagihara K; Toi M
Clin Ther; 2010 Feb; 32(2):311-26. PubMed ID: 20206789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the addition of rituximab to CHOP in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma.
Ferrara F; Ravasio R
Clin Drug Investig; 2008; 28(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 18081361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
