255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29617928)
1. DeFine: deep convolutional neural networks accurately quantify intensities of transcription factor-DNA binding and facilitate evaluation of functional non-coding variants.
Wang M; Tai C; E W; Wei L
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jun; 46(11):e69. PubMed ID: 29617928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of models in predicting the effects of SNPs on TF-DNA binding using large-scale in vitro and in vivo data.
Han D; Li Y; Wang L; Liang X; Miao Y; Li W; Wang S; Wang Z
Brief Bioinform; 2024 Jan; 25(2):. PubMed ID: 38517697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancing the interpretability of transcription factor binding site prediction using attention mechanism.
Park S; Koh Y; Jeon H; Kim H; Yeo Y; Kang J
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13413. PubMed ID: 32770026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The functional consequences of variation in transcription factor binding.
Cusanovich DA; Pavlovic B; Pritchard JK; Gilad Y
PLoS Genet; 2014 Mar; 10(3):e1004226. PubMed ID: 24603674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying Intensities of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding by Learning From an Ensemble of Protein Binding Microarrays.
Quan L; Mei J; He R; Sun X; Nie L; Li K; Lyu Q
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 Jul; 25(7):2811-2819. PubMed ID: 33571101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. De novo prediction of cis-regulatory elements and modules through integrative analysis of a large number of ChIP datasets.
Niu M; Tabari ES; Su Z
BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15():1047. PubMed ID: 25442502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transcription factor-binding k-mer analysis clarifies the cell type dependency of binding specificities and cis-regulatory SNPs in humans.
Tahara S; Tsuchiya T; Matsumoto H; Ozaki H
BMC Genomics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):597. PubMed ID: 37805453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GERV: a statistical method for generative evaluation of regulatory variants for transcription factor binding.
Zeng H; Hashimoto T; Kang DD; Gifford DK
Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 26476779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PlantPAN3.0: a new and updated resource for reconstructing transcriptional regulatory networks from ChIP-seq experiments in plants.
Chow CN; Lee TY; Hung YC; Li GZ; Tseng KC; Liu YH; Kuo PL; Zheng HQ; Chang WC
Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jan; 47(D1):D1155-D1163. PubMed ID: 30395277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DeepTFactor: A deep learning-based tool for the prediction of transcription factors.
Kim GB; Gao Y; Palsson BO; Lee SY
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jan; 118(2):. PubMed ID: 33372147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Properly defining the targets of a transcription factor significantly improves the computational identification of cooperative transcription factor pairs in yeast.
Wu WS; Lai FJ
BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S10. PubMed ID: 26679776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ChIP-GSM: Inferring active transcription factor modules to predict functional regulatory elements.
Chen X; Neuwald AF; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R; Xuan J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1009203. PubMed ID: 34292930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of deep learning approaches for modeling transcription factor sequence specificity.
Zhang Y; Mo Q; Xue L; Luo J
Genomics; 2021 Nov; 113(6):3774-3781. PubMed ID: 34534646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanistic interpretation of non-coding variants for discovering transcriptional regulators of drug response.
Xie X; Hanson C; Sinha S
BMC Biol; 2019 Jul; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 31362726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
Agius P; Arvey A; Chang W; Noble WS; Leslie C
PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 20838582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parsing regulatory DNA: general tasks, techniques, and the PhyloGibbs approach.
Siddharthan R
J Biosci; 2007 Aug; 32(5):863-70. PubMed ID: 17914228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chromatin interaction-aware gene regulatory modeling with graph attention networks.
Karbalayghareh A; Sahin M; Leslie CS
Genome Res; 2022 May; 32(5):930-944. PubMed ID: 35396274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Base-resolution methylation patterns accurately predict transcription factor bindings in vivo.
Xu T; Li B; Zhao M; Szulwach KE; Street RC; Lin L; Yao B; Zhang F; Jin P; Wu H; Qin ZS
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Mar; 43(5):2757-66. PubMed ID: 25722376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. QBiC-Pred: quantitative predictions of transcription factor binding changes due to sequence variants.
Martin V; Zhao J; Afek A; Mielko Z; Gordân R
Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jul; 47(W1):W127-W135. PubMed ID: 31114870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disease-associated non-coding variants alter NKX2-5 DNA-binding affinity.
Peña-Martínez EG; Rivera-Madera A; Pomales-Matos DA; Sanabria-Alberto L; Rosario-Cañuelas BM; Rodríguez-Ríos JM; Carrasquillo-Dones EA; Rodríguez-Martínez JA
Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech; 2023 Mar; 1866(1):194906. PubMed ID: 36690178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
