These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29618233)
1. Using Commercial Physical Activity Trackers for Health Promotion Research: Four Case Studies. Turner-McGrievy G; Jake-Schoffman DE; Singletary C; Wright M; Crimarco A; Wirth MD; Shivappa N; Mandes T; West DS; Wilcox S; Drenowatz C; Hester A; McGrievy MJ Health Promot Pract; 2019 May; 20(3):381-389. PubMed ID: 29618233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey. Alley S; Schoeppe S; Guertler D; Jennings C; Duncan MJ; Vandelanotte C BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011243. PubMed ID: 27388359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using Fitbit as an mHealth Intervention Tool to Promote Physical Activity: Potential Challenges and Solutions. Balbim GM; Marques IG; Marquez DX; Patel D; Sharp LK; Kitsiou S; Nyenhuis SM JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Mar; 9(3):e25289. PubMed ID: 33646135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of wearable fitness devices. Kaewkannate K; Kim S BMC Public Health; 2016 May; 16():433. PubMed ID: 27220855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore Adolescents' Perspectives on Combining Technologies for Physical Activity Promotion Within an Intervention: Usability Study. Drehlich M; Naraine M; Rowe K; Lai SK; Salmon J; Brown H; Koorts H; Macfarlane S; Ridgers ND J Med Internet Res; 2020 Mar; 22(3):e15552. PubMed ID: 32141834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey. Paré G; Leaver C; Bourget C J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e177. PubMed ID: 29720359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validating Fitbit Zip for monitoring physical activity of children in school: a cross-sectional study. Mooses K; Oja M; Reisberg S; Vilo J; Kull M BMC Public Health; 2018 Jul; 18(1):858. PubMed ID: 29996797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables. Henriksen A; Haugen Mikalsen M; Woldaregay AZ; Muzny M; Hartvigsen G; Hopstock LA; Grimsgaard S J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e110. PubMed ID: 29567635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating Motivational Interviewing and Habit Formation to Enhance the Effect of Activity Trackers on Healthy Adults' Activity Levels: Randomized Intervention. Ellingson LD; Lansing JE; DeShaw KJ; Peyer KL; Bai Y; Perez M; Phillips LA; Welk GJ JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e10988. PubMed ID: 30762582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of Modern Activity Trackers for Monitoring Exercise Behavior in Chronic Cardiac Patients: Validation Study. Herkert C; Kraal JJ; van Loon EMA; van Hooff M; Kemps HMC JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Dec; 7(12):e15045. PubMed ID: 31855191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review. Straiton N; Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gullick J; Bhindi R; Gallagher R Maturitas; 2018 Jun; 112():85-93. PubMed ID: 29704922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How consumer physical activity monitors could transform human physiology research. Wright SP; Hall Brown TS; Collier SR; Sandberg K Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2017 Mar; 312(3):R358-R367. PubMed ID: 28052867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors for Specific Activity Types. Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Dickin DC; Montoye AH Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1619-28. PubMed ID: 27015387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of wearable activity monitors for tracking steps and estimating energy expenditure during a graded maximal treadmill test. Kendall B; Bellovary B; Gothe NP J Sports Sci; 2019 Jan; 37(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 29863968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of Fitbit Devices in Physical Activity Intervention Studies Across the Life Course: Narrative Review. St Fleur RG; St George SM; Leite R; Kobayashi M; Agosto Y; Jake-Schoffman DE JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 May; 9(5):e23411. PubMed ID: 34047705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Step count accuracy and reliability of two activity tracking devices in people after stroke. Schaffer SD; Holzapfel SD; Fulk G; Bosch PR Physiother Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 33(10):788-796. PubMed ID: 28777710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation. Mercer K; Giangregorio L; Schneider E; Chilana P; Li M; Grindrod K JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Jan; 4(1):e7. PubMed ID: 26818775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of the Fitbit Charge HR on physical activity, aerobic fitness and disability in non-specific back pain participants. Gordon R; Bloxham S J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2017 Dec; 57(12):1669-1675. PubMed ID: 28181773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Use of Wearable Activity Trackers in Schools to Promote Child and Adolescent Physical Activity: A Descriptive Content Analysis of School Staff's Perspectives. Creaser AV; Frazer MT; Costa S; Bingham DD; Clemes SA Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 36360944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Wearable Trackers' Ability to Estimate Sleep. Lee JM; Byun W; Keill A; Dinkel D; Seo Y Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jun; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 29914050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]