191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29618534)
1. Revisiting the False Confession Problem.
Alvarez-Toro V; Lopez-Morales CA
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 29618534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lies and coercion: why psychiatrists should not participate in police and intelligence interrogations.
Janofsky JS
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 17185476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Psychology of Confessions: A Review of the Literature and Issues.
Kassin SM; Gudjonsson GH
Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2004 Nov; 5(2):33-67. PubMed ID: 26158993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. False-evidence ploys and interrogations: mock jurors' perceptions of false-evidence ploy type, deception, coercion, and justification.
Forrest KD; Woody WD; Brady SE; Batterman KC; Stastny BJ; Bruns JA
Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):342-64. PubMed ID: 22315159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the general acceptance of confessions research: Opinions of the scientific community.
Kassin SM; Redlich AD; Alceste F; Luke TJ
Am Psychol; 2018 Jan; 73(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 29345487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions?
Leo RA; Liu B
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):381-99. PubMed ID: 19405041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors' verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence.
Woody WD; Forrest KD
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):333-60. PubMed ID: 19405020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of confession evidence on jurors' verdict decisions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mindthoff A; Ferreira PA; Meissner CA
Law Hum Behav; 2024 Jun; 48(3):163-181. PubMed ID: 38949764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Commentary: ethics-related implications and neurobiological correlates of false confessions in juveniles.
Weinstock R; Thompson C
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 19767499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. False confessions.
Kassin SM
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2017 Nov; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 28485886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. False confessions, expert testimony, and admissibility.
Watson C; Weiss KJ; Pouncey C
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 20542936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The prevalence of false confessions in experimental laboratory simulations: A meta-analysis.
Stewart JM; Woody WD; Pulos S
Behav Sci Law; 2018 Jan; 36(1):12-31. PubMed ID: 29460441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Admissibility of false-confession testimony: know thy standard.
Quintieri P; Weiss KJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):535-8. PubMed ID: 16394232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interrogations, confessions, and adolescent offenders' perceptions of the legal system.
Arndorfer A; Malloy LC; Cauffman E
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Oct; 39(5):503-13. PubMed ID: 26011040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How confession characteristics impact juror perceptions of evidence in criminal trials.
Shifton JJ
Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):90-108. PubMed ID: 30706960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of expert testimony and interrogation tactics on perceptions of confessions.
Moffa MS; Platania J
Psychol Rep; 2007 Apr; 100(2):563-70. PubMed ID: 17564233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inside interrogation: the lie, the bluff, and false confessions.
Perillo JT; Kassin SM
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 20734122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Commentary: It's about the fundamentals.
Young JL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):479-81. PubMed ID: 17185477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Commentary: overcoming judicial preferences for person- versus situation-based analyses of interrogation-induced confessions.
Davis D; Leo RA
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 20542937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
