118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2961891)
1. Exaggerated hearing loss in compensation claimants.
Alberti PW; Hyde ML; Riko K
J Otolaryngol; 1987 Dec; 16(6):362-6. PubMed ID: 2961891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory evoked potentials in audiometric assessment of compensation and medicolegal patients.
Hyde M; Alberti P; Matsumoto N; Li YL
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(5 Pt 1):514-9. PubMed ID: 2945508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cortical evoked response audiometry thresholds and neuroleptic, sedative, hypnotic drugs.
Dejonckere PH; Lebacq J; Coryn C
Int Tinnitus J; 2000; 6(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 14689614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss.
Hone SW; Norman G; Keogh I; Kelly V
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Feb; 128(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 12601323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Medical surveillance of occupational hearing loss].
Idoate Carvajal M
Rev Sanid Hig Publica (Madr); 1990; 64(11-12):599-612. PubMed ID: 2151868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between middle latency responses and late auditory evoked potentials for approximating frequency-specific hearing levels in medicolegal patients with occupational hearing loss.
Dejonckere PH; Coryn CP
Int Tinnitus J; 2000; 6(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 14689639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An economic evaluation of present and proposed methods of compensating hearing loss.
Alberti PW; LeBlanc J
J Otolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 8(4):326-38. PubMed ID: 159960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tinnitus in occupational hearing loss: nosological aspects.
Alberti PW
J Otolaryngol; 1987 Feb; 16(1):34-5. PubMed ID: 2951528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [From the expert office: The medio-cochlear hearing loss in the noise worker].
Brusis T
Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Mar; 90(3):166-7. PubMed ID: 21380961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Determination of hearing loss and disability assessment from pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in occupational noise-induced hearing loss].
Brusis T
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):732-8. PubMed ID: 9081278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Contribution of cortical-ERA in the evaluation of occupational deafness].
Galán Cortés JC; Beagley HA; Suárez Nieto C; Gutiérrez González A
An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am; 1986; 13(1):65-81. PubMed ID: 3706680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hearing aid usage in occupational hearing loss claimants.
Riko K; McShane D; Hyde ML; Alberti PW
J Otolaryngol; 1990 Feb; 19(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 2138229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K
Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [From the expert's office: could a medical expert be hold liable for the results of his expertise?].
Brusis T
Laryngorhinootologie; 2008 May; 87(5):349-51. PubMed ID: 18431711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and accuracy of electric response audiometry using the auditory steady-state response: evaluation in an empirical design.
Kaf WA; Durrant JD; Sabo DL; Robert Boston J; Taubman LB; Kovacyk K
Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):211-23. PubMed ID: 16684702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Significance of ERA for differentiating hearing disorders of different origins].
Schmidt W; Lehnhardt E; Battmer RD
HNO; 1983 Apr; 31(4):109-16. PubMed ID: 6853225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [From the Expert Office: C5-dip=Noise-Induced Hearing Loss?].
Brusis T
Laryngorhinootologie; 2009 Nov; 88(11):733-5. PubMed ID: 19911322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
