These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2961995)

  • 1. Baby Doe five years later.
    N Engl J Med; 1988 Feb; 318(5):321-2. PubMed ID: 2961995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Baby Doe five years later. Implications for child health.
    Lantos J
    N Engl J Med; 1987 Aug; 317(7):444-7. PubMed ID: 2956518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Baby Doe rules.
    Angell M
    N Engl J Med; 1986 Mar; 314(10):642-4. PubMed ID: 2935736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Baby Doe: nothing to fear but fear itself.
    Barnett TJ
    J Perinatol; 1990 Sep; 10(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 2145405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The case of Baby Jane Doe. 2. Baby Jane Doe in the courts.
    Steinbock B
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Feb; 14(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 6232243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Baby Doe regulations: views from perinatal social workers.
    York GY; Gallarno RM
    J Perinatol; 1990 Sep; 10(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 2145406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ANA Council of Nurses distributes document on "Baby Doe" regulations: final rules for changes in the regulations that implement Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act ("Baby Doe").
    Penticuff J
    Fla Nurse; 1986 Mar; 35(3):15. PubMed ID: 2937662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extreme prematurity and parental rights after Baby Doe.
    Robertson JA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2004; 34(4):32-9. PubMed ID: 15379100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ballad of Baby Doe: parental discretion or medical neglect?
    Victoroff MS
    Prim Care; 1986 Jun; 13(2):271-83. PubMed ID: 2941814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An introduction to the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc.
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 2931397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation of the federal "Baby Doe" administrative regulations in Kentucky.
    Camic R
    Ky Nurse; 1986; 34(1):16. PubMed ID: 3633007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whatever happened to Baby Doe?
    Vernon J
    Neonatal Netw; 1998 Mar; 17(2):73-4. PubMed ID: 9592503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protection of disabled newborns: are there constitutional limitations?
    Bopp J
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):173-200. PubMed ID: 2933364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When parents refuse treatment for children.
    Gerber PC
    Physicians Manage; 1984 Sep; 24(9):114-6, 121, 124 passim. PubMed ID: 10317507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Court decisions and the feds: travesty or tragedy?
    Curtin LL
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 6212784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ANA testifies on NLRB backlog, rights of handicapped infants.
    Bauknecht VL
    Am Nurse; 1985; 17(7):3, 10. PubMed ID: 3161439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neonatologists judge the "Baby Doe" regulations.
    Kopelman LM; Irons TG; Kopelman AE
    N Engl J Med; 1988 Mar; 318(11):677-83. PubMed ID: 3344019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Baby Doe controversy.
    N Engl J Med; 1986 Sep; 315(11):707-8. PubMed ID: 3748076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dilemma of wrongful birth, wrongful life. Interview by Bill trent.
    Dickens BM
    CMAJ; 1985 Dec; 133(12):1238-40. PubMed ID: 2933137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical ethics and the law.
    Stahlman MT
    Pediatr Res; 1986 Sep; 20(9):913-4. PubMed ID: 2944067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.