These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29620432)
1. Identifying Algorithms to Improve the Accuracy of Unverified Diagnosis Codes for Birth Defects. Salemi JL; Rutkowski RE; Tanner JP; Matas JL; Kirby RS Public Health Rep; 2018; 133(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 29620432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Accuracy of Hospital Discharge Diagnosis Codes for Major Birth Defects: Evaluation of a Statewide Registry With Passive Case Ascertainment. Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Sampat D; Anjohrin SB; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS J Public Health Manag Pract; 2016; 22(3):E9-E19. PubMed ID: 26125231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs? Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relative contribution of data sources to a birth defects registry utilizing passive multisource ascertainment methods: does a smaller birth defects case ascertainment net lead to overall or disproportionate loss? Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Block S; Bailey M; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS J Registry Manag; 2011; 38(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 22097703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Birth defects surveillance in Florida: infant death certificates as a case ascertainment source. Tanner JP; Salemi JL; Hauser KW; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2010 Dec; 88(12):1017-22. PubMed ID: 20842648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Accuracy of Birth Defects Indicators on the 2003 Revision of the U.S. Birth Certificate: Has Data Quality Improved? Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Sampat DP; Rutkowski RE; Anjohrin SB; Marshall J; Kirby RS Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 27859434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Developing a database management system to support birth defects surveillance in Florida. Salemi JL; Hauser KW; Tanner JP; Sampat D; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):10-5; quiz 38-9. PubMed ID: 20795564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the impact of expanding the number of diagnosis codes reported in inpatient discharge databases on the counts and rates of birth defects. Salemi JL; Rutkowski RE; Tanner JP; Matas J; Kirby RS J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Nov; 25(11):1524-1533. PubMed ID: 30124843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison of Active and Passive Surveillance Strategies for Selected Birth Defects in New York. Howley MM; Williford E; St Louis AM; Michalski AM; Browne ML; Fisher SC Birth Defects Res; 2024 Sep; 116(9):e2399. PubMed ID: 39238173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Registry data quality improvement by identifying discrepancies between assigned codes and text descriptions of birth defects. Richardson SD; Fox DJ; Wittman B J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 24625769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of two surveillance strategies for selected birth defects in Florida. Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Kennedy S; Block S; Bailey M; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS Public Health Rep; 2012; 127(4):391-400. PubMed ID: 22753982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York State using hospital discharge data. Wang Y; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross PK; Druschel CM; Hwang SA Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):663-8. PubMed ID: 16240383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating Difficult Decisions in Public Health Surveillance: Striking the Right Balance between Timeliness and Completeness. Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Anjohrin SB; Rutkowski RE; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS J Registry Manag; 2015; 42(2):48-61. PubMed ID: 26360106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of congenital anomaly coding in Canada's administrative databases compared with a congenital anomaly registry. Metcalfe A; Sibbald B; Lowry RB; Tough S; Bernier FP Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2014 Feb; 100(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 24307632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of passive surveillance for NTD-affected births in Alaska: a case verification study, birth years 1996-2007. Schoellhorn KJ; Collins S J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 20795563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and implementation of the first national data quality standards for population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States. Anderka M; Mai CT; Romitti PA; Copeland G; Isenburg J; Feldkamp ML; Krikov S; Rickard R; Olney RS; Canfield MA; Stanton C; Mosley B; Kirby RS BMC Public Health; 2015 Sep; 15():925. PubMed ID: 26386816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of ICD-9-CM codes for major genitourinary birth defects in Military Health System administrative data, 2006-2014. Romano CJ; Magallon SM; Hall C; Bukowinski AT; Gumbs GR; Conlin AMS Birth Defects Res; 2024 Jan; 116(1):e2265. PubMed ID: 37933714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive predictive value of computerized records for major congenital malformations. Cooper WO; Hernandez-Diaz S; Gideon P; Dyer SM; Hall K; Dudley J; Cevasco M; Thompson AB; Ray WA Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 May; 17(5):455-60. PubMed ID: 18081215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the Impact of Different Race-Bridging Algorithms on the Reported Rate of Birth Defects. Rutkowski RE; Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Matas JL; Kirby RS J Registry Manag; 2017; 44(4):146-156. PubMed ID: 30133431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]