These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Controlling for experimental effects in event-related potentials by means of principal component rotation. Beauducel A; Leue A J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 239():139-47. PubMed ID: 25455342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Misallocation of variance in event-related potentials: simulation studies on the effects of test power, topography, and baseline-to-peak versus principal component quantifications. Beauducel A; Debener S J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Mar; 124(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 12648769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Addressing misallocation of variance in principal components analysis of event-related potentials. Dien J Brain Topogr; 1998; 11(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 9758391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating two-step PCA of ERP data with Geomin, Infomax, Oblimin, Promax, and Varimax rotations. Dien J Psychophysiology; 2010 Jan; 47(1):170-83. PubMed ID: 19761521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations. Dien J; Beal DJ; Berg P Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 116(8):1808-25. PubMed ID: 15996897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: misallocation of variance revisited. Achim A; Marcantoni W Psychophysiology; 1997 Sep; 34(5):597-606. PubMed ID: 9299914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: simulation studies demonstrate misallocation of variance across components. Wood CC; McCarthy G Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 Jun; 59(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 6203715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of PCA and ICA of simulated ERPs: Promax vs. Infomax rotations. Dien J; Khoe W; Mangun GR Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Aug; 28(8):742-63. PubMed ID: 17133395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: a note on misallocation of variance. Möcks J; Verleger R Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Sep; 65(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 2427330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PCAVR: a portable laboratory program for performing varimax-rotated principal components analysis of event-related potentials. Pritchard WS Brain Res Bull; 1984 Sep; 13(3):465-73. PubMed ID: 6548655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Residue iteration decomposition (RIDE): A new method to separate ERP components on the basis of latency variability in single trials. Ouyang G; Herzmann G; Zhou C; Sommer W Psychophysiology; 2011 Dec; 48(12):1631-47. PubMed ID: 21895682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploratory factor analysis for small samples. Jung S; Lee S Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):701-9. PubMed ID: 21431996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconstructing ERP amplitude effects after compensating for trial-to-trial latency jitter: A solution based on a novel application of residue iteration decomposition. Ouyang G; Sommer W; Zhou C Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Nov; 109():9-20. PubMed ID: 27693102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parallel Factor Analysis as an exploratory tool for wavelet transformed event-related EEG. Mørup M; Hansen LK; Herrmann CS; Parnas J; Arnfred SM Neuroimage; 2006 Feb; 29(3):938-47. PubMed ID: 16185898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is it positive or negative? on determining ERP components. Graben Pb; Frisch S IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1374-82. PubMed ID: 15311822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychometric considerations in the measurement of event-related brain potentials: Guidelines for measurement and reporting. Clayson PE; Miller GA Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Jan; 111():57-67. PubMed ID: 27619493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]