189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29621904)
1. The birth canal: correlation between the pubic arch angle, the interspinous diameter, and the obstetrical conjugate: a computed tomography biometric study in reproductive age women.
Perlman S; Raviv-Zilka L; Levinsky D; Gidron A; Achiron R; Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(19):3255-3265. PubMed ID: 29621904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting mid-pelvic interspinous distance in women using height and pubic arch angle.
Na ED; Baek MJ; Moon JH; Park CW; Yoon J; Lee H; Park SH; Jang JH
PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0289814. PubMed ID: 37561690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sacral orientation revisited.
Peleg S; Dar G; Steinberg N; Peled N; Hershkovitz I; Masharawi Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):E397-404. PubMed ID: 17621195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed tomographic study of anatomical relationship between pubic symphysis and ischial spines to improve interpretation of intrapartum translabial ultrasound.
Arthuis CJ; Perrotin F; Patat F; Brunereau L; Simon EG
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 48(6):779-785. PubMed ID: 26678354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Analysis of normal pelvis morphometry of modern Chinese southern Han female and its correlation with age].
Liu P; Yu YH; Chen CL; Tang YX; Wang L; Mao DR; Xu YK; Chen L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 48(7):481-5. PubMed ID: 24284215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance.
Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z; Spira M; Kedem A; Katorza E; Moran O; Achiron R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):442-6. PubMed ID: 23001876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breech progression angle: new feasible and reliable transperineal ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal breech descent in birth canal.
Youssef A; Brunelli E; Fiorentini M; Lenzi J; Pilu G; El-Balat A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 58(4):609-615. PubMed ID: 33847431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How reproducible are classical and new CT-pelvimetry measurements?
Capelle C; Devos P; Caudrelier C; Verpillat P; Fourquet T; Puech P; Garabedian C; Lemaitre L
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Feb; 101(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 31473163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring the angle of the subpubic arch using three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound scan: intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility.
Choi S; Chan SS; Sahota DS; Leung TY
Am J Perinatol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 22875664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is anatomic acetabular orientation related to pelvic morphology? CT analysis of 150 healthy pelvises.
Sautet P; Giorgi H; Chabrand P; Tropiano P; Argenson JN; Parratte S; Blondel B
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 May; 104(3):347-351. PubMed ID: 29122687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of subpubic arch angle by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and impact on vaginal delivery.
Albrich SB; Shek K; Krahn U; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 25678020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pelvic Tilt Evaluation From Frontal Radiographs: The Validity, Interobserver Reliability and Intraobserver Reproducibility of the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic Parameter.
Ragsdale MI; Wong FS; Boutin RD; Meehan JP
J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1665-1669. PubMed ID: 28012720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI-based pelvimetric measurements as predictors for a successful vaginal breech delivery in the Frankfurt Breech at term cohort (FRABAT).
Klemt AS; Schulze S; Brüggmann D; Louwen F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Jan; 232():10-17. PubMed ID: 30453166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Obstetric pelvimetry by three-dimensional computed tomography in non-pregnant Japanese women: a retrospective single-center study.
Nishikawa S; Miki M; Chigusa Y; Furuta M; Kido A; Kawamura Y; Ueda Y; Mandai M; Mogami H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(1):2190444. PubMed ID: 36927362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pelvimetry in nulliparous and primiparous women using 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.
Hampel F; Hallscheidt P; Sohn C; Schlehe B; Brocker KA
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Aug; 37(6):1950-1956. PubMed ID: 29464757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A possible prediction of dystocia at the time of cesarean delivery: Gluteal muscle contracture, a single center experience from China.
You T; Yang B; Zhang XT; Ren SY; Bai L; Jiao FJ; Jiang XC; Guan SY; Zhang WT
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Feb; 99(7):e19138. PubMed ID: 32049835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between the distance from the pubic symphysis to the sacrum with pelvic incidence.
Abola MV; Knapik DM; Cooperman DR; Liu RW
Hip Int; 2019 Sep; 29(5):564-567. PubMed ID: 31109191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Which Foetal-Pelvic Variables Are Useful for Predicting Caesarean Section and Instrumental Assistance?
Frémondière P; Thollon L; Adalian P; Delotte J; Marchal F
Med Princ Pract; 2017; 26(4):359-367. PubMed ID: 28538223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The subpubic angle in sex determination: anthropometric measurements and analyses on Anatolian Caucasians using multidetector computed tomography datasets.
Karakas HM; Harma A; Alicioglu B
J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(8):1004-9. PubMed ID: 24237808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The morphometric study of the sacrospinal and sacrotuberal ligaments correlated with the morphometry of the pelvis.
Seizeur R; Forlodou P; Person H; Morin JF; Sénécail B
Surg Radiol Anat; 2005 Dec; 27(6):517-23. PubMed ID: 16307198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
