These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29621904)
1. The birth canal: correlation between the pubic arch angle, the interspinous diameter, and the obstetrical conjugate: a computed tomography biometric study in reproductive age women. Perlman S; Raviv-Zilka L; Levinsky D; Gidron A; Achiron R; Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(19):3255-3265. PubMed ID: 29621904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting mid-pelvic interspinous distance in women using height and pubic arch angle. Na ED; Baek MJ; Moon JH; Park CW; Yoon J; Lee H; Park SH; Jang JH PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0289814. PubMed ID: 37561690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sacral orientation revisited. Peleg S; Dar G; Steinberg N; Peled N; Hershkovitz I; Masharawi Y Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):E397-404. PubMed ID: 17621195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed tomographic study of anatomical relationship between pubic symphysis and ischial spines to improve interpretation of intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Arthuis CJ; Perrotin F; Patat F; Brunereau L; Simon EG Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 48(6):779-785. PubMed ID: 26678354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Analysis of normal pelvis morphometry of modern Chinese southern Han female and its correlation with age]. Liu P; Yu YH; Chen CL; Tang YX; Wang L; Mao DR; Xu YK; Chen L Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 48(7):481-5. PubMed ID: 24284215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance. Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z; Spira M; Kedem A; Katorza E; Moran O; Achiron R Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):442-6. PubMed ID: 23001876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breech progression angle: new feasible and reliable transperineal ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal breech descent in birth canal. Youssef A; Brunelli E; Fiorentini M; Lenzi J; Pilu G; El-Balat A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 58(4):609-615. PubMed ID: 33847431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How reproducible are classical and new CT-pelvimetry measurements? Capelle C; Devos P; Caudrelier C; Verpillat P; Fourquet T; Puech P; Garabedian C; Lemaitre L Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Feb; 101(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 31473163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring the angle of the subpubic arch using three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound scan: intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility. Choi S; Chan SS; Sahota DS; Leung TY Am J Perinatol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 22875664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is anatomic acetabular orientation related to pelvic morphology? CT analysis of 150 healthy pelvises. Sautet P; Giorgi H; Chabrand P; Tropiano P; Argenson JN; Parratte S; Blondel B Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 May; 104(3):347-351. PubMed ID: 29122687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of subpubic arch angle by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and impact on vaginal delivery. Albrich SB; Shek K; Krahn U; Dietz HP Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 25678020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pelvic Tilt Evaluation From Frontal Radiographs: The Validity, Interobserver Reliability and Intraobserver Reproducibility of the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic Parameter. Ragsdale MI; Wong FS; Boutin RD; Meehan JP J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1665-1669. PubMed ID: 28012720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI-based pelvimetric measurements as predictors for a successful vaginal breech delivery in the Frankfurt Breech at term cohort (FRABAT). Klemt AS; Schulze S; Brüggmann D; Louwen F Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Jan; 232():10-17. PubMed ID: 30453166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Obstetric pelvimetry by three-dimensional computed tomography in non-pregnant Japanese women: a retrospective single-center study. Nishikawa S; Miki M; Chigusa Y; Furuta M; Kido A; Kawamura Y; Ueda Y; Mandai M; Mogami H J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(1):2190444. PubMed ID: 36927362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pelvimetry in nulliparous and primiparous women using 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Hampel F; Hallscheidt P; Sohn C; Schlehe B; Brocker KA Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Aug; 37(6):1950-1956. PubMed ID: 29464757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A possible prediction of dystocia at the time of cesarean delivery: Gluteal muscle contracture, a single center experience from China. You T; Yang B; Zhang XT; Ren SY; Bai L; Jiao FJ; Jiang XC; Guan SY; Zhang WT Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Feb; 99(7):e19138. PubMed ID: 32049835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between the distance from the pubic symphysis to the sacrum with pelvic incidence. Abola MV; Knapik DM; Cooperman DR; Liu RW Hip Int; 2019 Sep; 29(5):564-567. PubMed ID: 31109191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Which Foetal-Pelvic Variables Are Useful for Predicting Caesarean Section and Instrumental Assistance? Frémondière P; Thollon L; Adalian P; Delotte J; Marchal F Med Princ Pract; 2017; 26(4):359-367. PubMed ID: 28538223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The subpubic angle in sex determination: anthropometric measurements and analyses on Anatolian Caucasians using multidetector computed tomography datasets. Karakas HM; Harma A; Alicioglu B J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(8):1004-9. PubMed ID: 24237808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The morphometric study of the sacrospinal and sacrotuberal ligaments correlated with the morphometry of the pelvis. Seizeur R; Forlodou P; Person H; Morin JF; Sénécail B Surg Radiol Anat; 2005 Dec; 27(6):517-23. PubMed ID: 16307198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]