189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29621904)
21. Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma.
Pavličev M; Romero R; Mitteroecker P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 222(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 31251927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pubic Arch Angle Measurement by Transperineal Ultrasonography: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Carvalho Neto RH; Viana Junior AB; Moron AF; Araujo Júnior E; Carvalho FHC; Feitosa HN
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2020 Apr; 42(4):181-187. PubMed ID: 32330959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Anatomic study for pubic medullary screw insertion.
Suzuki T; Soma K; Shindo M; Minehara H; Itoman M
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2008 Dec; 16(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 19126899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Measurement of the infrapubic angle using 3D perineal ultrasound and its relationship to obstetrical parameters].
Albrich S; Laterza RM; Merinsky A; Skala C; Koelbl H; Naumann G
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E95-E100. PubMed ID: 22723036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Anatomic relationship between the pubic symphysis and ischial spines and its clinical significance in the assessment of fetal head engagement and station during labor.
Barbera AF; Imani F; Becker T; Lezotte DC; Hobbins JC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 19248004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Variation of the obturator foramen and pubic arch of the female bony pelvis.
Ridgeway BM; Arias BE; Barber MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 May; 198(5):546.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18355775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pelvic inlet area is associated with birth mode.
Starrach T; Schmidhuber L; Elger L; Franz M; Buechel J; Hübener C; Kolben T; Koliogiannis V; Mahner S; Hasbargen U; Fischer B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jan; 102(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 36320156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effects of squatting while pregnant on pelvic dimensions: A computational simulation to understand childbirth.
Hemmerich A; Bandrowska T; Dumas GA
J Biomech; 2019 Apr; 87():64-74. PubMed ID: 30851977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Can three-dimensional pelvimetry using low-dose stereoradiography replace low-dose CT pelvimetry?
Aubry S; Padoin P; Petegnief Y; Vidal C; Riethmuller D; Delabrousse E
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Sep; 99(9):569-576. PubMed ID: 29567122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Three-dimensional pelvimetry by computed tomography.
Lenhard M; Johnson T; Weckbach S; Nikolaou K; Friese K; Hasbargen U
Radiol Med; 2009 Aug; 114(5):827-34. PubMed ID: 19551346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Obstetric conjugate diameter (conjuata vera obstetrica). New results obtained via ultrasonic measurements during pregnancy (author's transl)].
Göttlicher S; Madjaric I
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1978 Oct; 182(5):376-80. PubMed ID: 735275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reexamination of pelvic inlet and outlet images using 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions.
Pekmezci M; Rotter P; Toogood P; Morshed S; Kandemir U
J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Jun; 28(6):324-9. PubMed ID: 24149448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Computed tomography pelvimetry as a predictor of technical difficulty in total mesorectal excision].
Yan HH; Lou Z; Sheng J; Zhang W; Fu CG; Meng RG
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 14(11):846-50. PubMed ID: 22116717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Normal pelvic dimensions of Nigerian women in Ile Ife by computed tomographic pelvimetry.
Ma'aji SM; Adetiloye VA; Ayoola OO
Niger Postgrad Med J; 2007 Jun; 14(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 17599106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Antepartum evaluation of the obstetric conjugate at transabdominal 2D ultrasound: A feasibility study.
Di Pasquo E; Volpe N; Labadini C; Morganelli G; Di Tonto A; Schera GBL; Rizzo G; Frusca T; Ghi T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Oct; 100(10):1917-1923. PubMed ID: 34240404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pelvimetry by Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Non-Pregnant Multiparous Women Who Delivered Vaginally.
Salk I; Cetin A; Salk S; Cetin M
Pol J Radiol; 2016; 81():219-27. PubMed ID: 27231494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Application of computed tomography for the evaluation of obstetrically relevant pelvic parameters in German Holstein-Friesian cows.
Tsousis G; Heun C; Becker M; Bollwein H
Theriogenology; 2010 Feb; 73(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 19959219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Anatomic changes in the pelvis after uncomplicated vaginal delivery: a CT study on 14 women.
Garagiola DM; Tarver RD; Gibson L; Rogers RE; Wass JL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Dec; 153(6):1239-41. PubMed ID: 2816641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. MR imaging of pubic symphysis after uncomplicated vaginal delivery and planned caesarean delivery in the first postpartum week.
Agten CA; Metzler C; Rosskopf AB; Zanetti M; Binkert CA; Prentl E; Pfirrmann CWA
Clin Imaging; 2019; 56():58-62. PubMed ID: 30913524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The long-term effect of pelvic osteotomy on birth canal size.
Loder RT
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Feb; 122(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11995877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
