BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29622459)

  • 41. A comparison of ventricular function during high right ventricular septal and apical pacing after his-bundle ablation for refractory atrial fibrillation.
    Mera F; DeLurgio DB; Patterson RE; Merlino JD; Wade ME; León AR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1234-9. PubMed ID: 10461302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Impact of His bundle pacing on right ventricular performance in patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation.
    Grieco D; Bressi E; Curila K; Padala SK; Sedlacek K; Kron J; Fedele E; Ionita O; Giannuzzi S; Fagagnini A; Panattoni G; De Ruvo E; Ellenbogen KA; Calò L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Jun; 44(6):986-994. PubMed ID: 33890685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Impact of Physiologic Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing Among Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Greater Than 35%: A Systematic Review for the 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.
    Slotwiner DJ; Raitt MH; Del-Carpio Munoz F; Mulpuru SK; Nasser N; Peterson PN
    Circulation; 2019 Aug; 140(8):e483-e503. PubMed ID: 30586773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Permanent His-bundle pacing maintains long-term ventricular synchrony and left ventricular performance, unlike conventional right ventricular apical pacing.
    Catanzariti D; Maines M; Manica A; Angheben C; Varbaro A; Vergara G
    Europace; 2013 Apr; 15(4):546-53. PubMed ID: 22997222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Long-term performance and risk factors analysis after permanent His-bundle pacing and atrioventricular node ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.
    Su L; Cai M; Wu S; Wang S; Xu T; Vijayaraman P; Huang W
    Europace; 2020 Dec; 22(Suppl_2):ii19-ii26. PubMed ID: 33370800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Electrophysiological observations of acute His bundle injury during permanent His bundle pacing.
    Vijayaraman P; Dandamudi G; Ellenbogen KA
    J Electrocardiol; 2016; 49(5):664-9. PubMed ID: 27457729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Within-patient comparison of His-bundle pacing, right ventricular pacing, and right ventricular pacing avoidance algorithms in patients with PR prolongation: Acute hemodynamic study.
    Keene D; Shun-Shin MJ; Arnold AD; March K; Qureshi N; Ng FS; Tanner M; Linton N; Lim PB; Lefroy D; Kanagaratnam P; Peters NS; Francis DP; Whinnett ZI
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Nov; 31(11):2964-2974. PubMed ID: 32976636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Biventricular versus His bundle pacing after atrioventricular node ablation in heart failure patients with narrow QRS.
    Žižek D; Antolič B; Mežnar AZ; Zavrl-Džananović D; Jan M; Štublar J; Pernat A
    Acta Cardiol; 2022 May; 77(3):222-230. PubMed ID: 34078244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of permanent left ventricular and biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation: a prospective hemodynamic study.
    Garrigue S; Bordachar P; Reuter S; Jaïs P; Haïssaguerre M; Clementy J
    Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Dec; 7(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 15071245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Clinical Outcomes of Selective Versus Nonselective His Bundle Pacing.
    Beer D; Sharma PS; Subzposh FA; Naperkowski A; Pietrasik GM; Durr B; Qureshi M; Panikkath R; Abdelrahman M; Williams BA; Hanifin JL; Zimberg R; Austin K; Macuch B; Trohman RG; Vanenkevort EA; Dandamudi G; Vijayaraman P
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2019 Jul; 5(7):766-774. PubMed ID: 31320004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to right ventricular pacing as a primary strategy for treating bradyarrhythmia: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Abdin A; Aktaa S; Vukadinović D; Arbelo E; Burri H; Glikson M; Meyer C; Munyombwe T; Nielsen JC; Ukena C; Vernooy K; Gale CP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2022 Nov; 111(11):1198-1209. PubMed ID: 34410461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Depolarization and repolarization dynamics after His-bundle pacing: Comparison with right ventricular pacing and native ventricular conduction.
    Yanagisawa S; Inden Y; Watanabe R; Tsurumi N; Suzuki N; Nakagomi T; Shimojo M; Okajima T; Riku S; Furui K; Suga K; Shibata R; Murohara T
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2022 Sep; 27(5):e12991. PubMed ID: 35802829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Feasibility, safety and outcomes of upgrading to left bundle branch pacing in patients with right ventricular pacing induced cardiomyopathy.
    Rademakers LM; Bouwmeester S; Mast TP; Dekker L; Houthuizen P; Bracke FA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Jun; 45(6):726-732. PubMed ID: 35510824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Permanent His-bundle pacing in patients with prosthetic cardiac valves.
    Sharma PS; Subzposh FA; Ellenbogen KA; Vijayaraman P
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Jan; 14(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 27663607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sequential His bundle and left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization.
    Deshmukh A; Sattur S; Bechtol T; Heckman LIB; Prinzen FW; Deshmukh P
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Sep; 31(9):2448-2454. PubMed ID: 32666630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Permanent, direct His-bundle pacing: a novel approach to cardiac pacing in patients with normal His-Purkinje activation.
    Deshmukh P; Casavant DA; Romanyshyn M; Anderson K
    Circulation; 2000 Feb; 101(8):869-77. PubMed ID: 10694526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Feasibility of Permanent His Bundle Pacing in the Elderly vs the Very Elderly. A Single-Center Mid-Term Follow-Up Study.
    Pestrea C; Cicala E; Gherghina A; Ortan F; Pop D
    Clin Interv Aging; 2023; 18():941-949. PubMed ID: 37332479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Impact of Physiologic Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing Among Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Greater Than 35%: A Systematic Review for the 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.
    Slotwiner DJ; Raitt MH; Del-Carpio Munoz F; Mulpuru SK; Nasser N; Peterson PN
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 74(7):988-1008. PubMed ID: 30412708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A single-centre experience of His bundle pacing without electrophysiological mapping system: implant success rate, safety, pacing characteristics and one-year follow up.
    Kui SL; Yeo C; Teo L; Him AL; Syed Hamid SB; Wong K; Tan VH
    Singapore Med J; 2023 Jun; 64(6):373-378. PubMed ID: 35651294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A randomized comparison of HBP versus RVP: Effect on left ventricular function and biomarkers of collagen metabolism.
    Mizner J; Waldauf P; Grieco D; Linkova H; Ionita O; Vijayaraman P; Petr R; Raková R; Vesela J; Stros P; Herman D; Osmancik P; Curila K
    Kardiol Pol; 2023; 81(5):472-481. PubMed ID: 36929298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.