These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29622516)

  • 41. Whole genome characterization of autochthonous Bos taurus brachyceros and introduced Bos indicus indicus cattle breeds in Cameroon regarding their adaptive phenotypic traits and pathogen resistance.
    Paguem A; Abanda B; Achukwi MD; Baskaran P; Czemmel S; Renz A; Eisenbarth A
    BMC Genet; 2020 Jun; 21(1):64. PubMed ID: 32571206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Tissue expression and the host's immunological recognition of a Rhipicephalus microplus paramyosin.
    Leal BF; Seixas A; Mattos RT; Coutinho ML; Masuda A; da Silva Vaz I; Ferreira CA
    Vet Parasitol; 2013 Oct; 197(1-2):304-11. PubMed ID: 23906807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Genome wide scan for quantitative trait loci affecting tick resistance in cattle (Bos taurus x Bos indicus).
    Machado MA; Azevedo AL; Teodoro RL; Pires MA; Peixoto MG; de Freitas C; Prata MC; Furlong J; da Silva MV; Guimarães SE; Regitano LC; Coutinho LL; Gasparin G; Verneque RS
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Apr; 11():280. PubMed ID: 20433753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: clotting time in tick-infested skin varies according to local inflammation and gene expression patterns in tick salivary glands.
    Carvalho WA; Maruyama SR; Franzin AM; Abatepaulo AR; Anderson JM; Ferreira BR; Ribeiro JM; Moré DD; Augusto Mendes Maia A; Valenzuela JG; Garcia GR; de Miranda Santos IK
    Exp Parasitol; 2010 Apr; 124(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 20045690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Relationship between the resistance of crossbred cattle to ticks, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) and Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum (Koch, 1844).
    Miranpuri GS
    Vet Parasitol; 1989 Jun; 31(3-4):289-301. PubMed ID: 2763448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Stochastic modelling to predict a priori the potential outcomes of different control schemes against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.
    Miotti C; Morel N; Signorini ML; Nava S
    Vet Parasitol; 2024 Feb; 326():110095. PubMed ID: 38142468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Differential expression of genes in resistant versus susceptible Gyr x Holstein cattle challenged with the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
    Nascimento CS; Machado MA; Guimarães SE; Guimarães MF; Peixoto JO; Furlong J; Prata MC; Verneque RS; Teodoro RL; Lopes PS
    Genet Mol Res; 2010 Oct; 9(4):1974-9. PubMed ID: 20927715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Economic efficiency of Rhipicephalus microplus control and effect on beef cattle performance in the Brazilian Cerrado.
    Calvano MPCA; Brumatti RC; Garcia MV; Barros JC; Andreotti R
    Exp Appl Acarol; 2019 Dec; 79(3-4):459-471. PubMed ID: 31786686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Ticks on pastures and on two breeds of cattle in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa.
    Nyangiwe N; Goni S; Hervé-Claude LP; Ruddat I; Horak IG
    Onderstepoort J Vet Res; 2011 Sep; 78(1):320. PubMed ID: 23327215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Immune responses against recombinant tick antigen, Bm95, for the control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus ticks in cattle.
    Kumar A; Garg R; Yadav CL; Vatsya S; Kumar RR; Sugumar P; Chandran D; Mangamoorib LN; Bedarkar SN
    Vet Parasitol; 2009 Oct; 165(1-2):119-24. PubMed ID: 19625129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ten years later: Evaluation of the effectiveness of 12.5% amitraz against a field population of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus using field studies, artificial infestation (Stall tests) and adult immersion tests.
    Maciel WG; Lopes WD; Cruz BC; Gomes LV; Teixeira WF; Buzzulini C; Bichuette MA; Campos GP; Felippelli G; Soares VE; de Oliveira GP; da Costa AJ
    Vet Parasitol; 2015 Dec; 214(3-4):233-41. PubMed ID: 26559460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Activation of several key components of the epidermal differentiation pathway in cattle following infestation with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
    Kongsuwan K; Josh P; Colgrave ML; Bagnall NH; Gough J; Burns B; Pearson R
    Int J Parasitol; 2010 Mar; 40(4):499-507. PubMed ID: 19909754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of Metarhizium anisopliae fungus on off-host Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus from tick-infested pasture under cattle grazing in Brazil.
    Garcia MV; Monteiro AC; Szabó MP; Mochi DA; Simi LD; Carvalho WM; Tsuruta SA; Barbosa JC
    Vet Parasitol; 2011 Sep; 181(2-4):267-73. PubMed ID: 21571437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Population dynamics and evaluation of the partial selective treatment of crossbreed steers naturally infested with Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in a herd from the state of Minas Gerais in Brazil.
    Gomes LV; Lopes WD; Teixeira WF; Maciel WG; Cruz BC; Felippelli G; Buzzulini C; Soares VE; de Melo DP; Bichuette MA; Gonçalves Junior G; da Costa AJ
    Vet Parasitol; 2016 Apr; 220():72-6. PubMed ID: 26995724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Contributions of the hair sheep breed Santa Ines as a maintenance host for Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Brazil.
    Garcia MV; Andreotti R; Reis FA; Aguirre Ade A; Barros JC; Matias J; Koller WW
    Parasit Vectors; 2014 Nov; 7():515. PubMed ID: 25404176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Genetic factors underlying host resistance to Rhipicephalus microplus tick infestation in Braford cattle: a systems biology perspective.
    Carvalho WA; Gaspar EB; Domingues R; Regitano LCA; Cardoso FF
    Mamm Genome; 2024 Jun; 35(2):186-200. PubMed ID: 38480585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Bovine immunisation with a recombinant peptide derived from synthetic SBm7462® (Bm86 epitope construct) immunogen for Rhipicephalus microplus control.
    Patarroyo S JH; de Sousa Neves E; Fidelis CF; Tafur-Gómez GA; de Araujo L; Vargas MI; Sossai S; Prates-Patarroyo PA
    Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2020 Sep; 11(5):101461. PubMed ID: 32723656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cellular infiltration at skin lesions and draining lymph nodes of sheep infested with adult Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum ticks.
    Boppana DK; Wikel SK; Raj DG; Manohar MB; Lalitha J
    Parasitology; 2005 Nov; 131(Pt 5):657-67. PubMed ID: 16255824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Detection of SNPs in bovine immune-response genes that may mediate resistance to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
    Abatepaulo AR; Caetano AR; Mendes CT; Carvalho WA; Ferreira BR; de Miranda Santos IK
    Anim Genet; 2008 Jun; 39(3):328-9. PubMed ID: 18371125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Network analysis uncovers putative genes affecting resistance to tick infestation in Braford cattle skin.
    Moré DD; Cardoso FF; Mudadu MA; Malagó-Jr W; Gulias-Gomes CC; Sollero BP; Ibelli AMG; Coutinho LL; Regitano LCA
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):998. PubMed ID: 31856720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.