These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29623381)

  • 1. The impact of perilaryngeal vibration on the self-perception of loudness and the Lombard effect.
    Brajot FX; Nguyen D; DiGiovanni J; Gracco VL
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jun; 236(6):1713-1723. PubMed ID: 29623381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of the Lombard effect in lingual vibrotactile thresholds.
    Petrosino L; Fucci D; Lowe R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Feb; 52(1):263-8. PubMed ID: 7232087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of selected masking noises on Lombard and sidetone amplification effects.
    Garber SF; Siegel GM; Pick HL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Sep; 19(3):523-35. PubMed ID: 979214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensory preference in speech production revealed by simultaneous alteration of auditory and somatosensory feedback.
    Lametti DR; Nasir SM; Ostry DJ
    J Neurosci; 2012 Jul; 32(27):9351-8. PubMed ID: 22764242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of tongue loading and auditory feedback on vowel production.
    Leung MT; Ciocca V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):316-25. PubMed ID: 21303013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interaction between auditory and oral sensory feedback in speech regulation.
    Fucci D; Crary MA; Warren JA; Bond ZS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Aug; 45(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 905073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responses of Middle-Frequency Modulations in Vocal Fundamental Frequency to Different Vocal Intensities and Auditory Feedback.
    Lee SH; Fang TJ; Yu JF; Lee GS
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):536-544. PubMed ID: 28268129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The functional relations among motor-based prediction, sensory goals and feedback in learning non-native speech sounds: Evidence from adult Mandarin Chinese speakers with an auditory feedback masking paradigm.
    Liu X; Tian X
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):11910. PubMed ID: 30093692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voice and speech of individuals with Parkinson s Disease during amplification, delay and masking situations.
    Coutinho SB; Diaféria G; Oliveira G; Behlau M
    Pro Fono; 2009; 21(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 19838568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audio-vocal responses of vocal fundamental frequency and formant during sustained vowel vocalizations in different noises.
    Lee SH; Hsiao TY; Lee GS
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():1-6. PubMed ID: 25749240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinct neural systems recruited when speech production is modulated by different masking sounds.
    Meekings S; Evans S; Lavan N; Boebinger D; Krieger-Redwood K; Cooke M; Scott SK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):8. PubMed ID: 27475128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Autophonic loudness perception in Parkinson's disease.
    Brajot FX; Shiller DM; Gracco VL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1364-71. PubMed ID: 27036273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensory feedback dependence hypothesis in persons who stutter.
    Namasivayam AK; van Lieshout P; McIlroy WE; De Nil L
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):688-707. PubMed ID: 19692132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of auditory masking on lingual vibrotactile magnitude-estimation scaling responses of young children.
    Petrosino L; Fucci D; Ellis L; Harris D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Apr; 68(2):523-9. PubMed ID: 2717360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of delayed auditory feedback and masking on the fundamental frequency of stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Lechner BK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Jun; 22(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 491561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of auditory disruption of lingual tactile sensitivity in skilled and unskilled speaking conditions.
    Krummel S; Petrosino L; Fucci D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Oct; 73(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 1766783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between masking levels and phonatory stability in normal-speaking women.
    Ferrand CT
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 16157468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.