161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29623910)
1. Evaluation of the SharkCore
Witt BL; Factor RE; Chadwick BE; Caron J; Siddiqui AA; Adler DG
Endosc Ultrasound; 2018; 7(5):323-328. PubMed ID: 29623910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative needle study: EUS-FNA procedures using the HD ProCore(™) and EchoTip(®) 22-gauge needle types.
Witt BL; Adler DG; Hilden K; Layfield LJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1069-74. PubMed ID: 23513000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Multicenter comparative trial of a novel EUS-guided core biopsy needle (SharkCore
Naveed M; Siddiqui AA; Kowalski TE; Loren DE; Khalid A; Soomro A; Mazhar SM; Yoo J; Hasan R; Yalamanchili S; Tarangelo N; Taylor LJ; Adler DG
Endosc Ultrasound; 2018; 7(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 29451167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathologic evaluation of a new endoscopic ultrasound needle designed to obtain core tissue samples: A pilot study.
Adler DG; Witt B; Chadwick B; Wells J; Taylor LJ; Dimaio C; Schmidt R
Endosc Ultrasound; 2016; 5(3):178-83. PubMed ID: 27386475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms.
Strand DS; Jeffus SK; Sauer BG; Wang AY; Stelow EB; Shami VM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Sep; 42(9):751-8. PubMed ID: 24550162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.
Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Samarasena JB; Park DH; Zhang Z; Gu M; Lee JG; Chang KJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):909-15. PubMed ID: 23433596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The 25-gauge EUS-FNA needle: Good for on-site but poor for off-site evaluation? Results of a randomized trial.
Varadarajulu S; Bang JY; Holt BA; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes RH; Hebert-Magee S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1056-63. PubMed ID: 24973173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Blinded prospective comparison of the performance of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas and peri-pancreatic lesions.
Lee JH; Stewart J; Ross WA; Anandasabapathy S; Xiao L; Staerkel G
Dig Dis Sci; 2009 Oct; 54(10):2274-81. PubMed ID: 19669880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between two types of needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine aspiration biopsy of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal masses.
Alkhateeb K; Lee BB; Alatassi H; Sanders MA; Omer EM; McClave SA; Fraig M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Mar; 48(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 31850666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided 22-gauge core needle with standard 25-gauge fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions.
Berzosa M; Villa N; El-Serag HB; Sejpal DV; Patel KK
Endosc Ultrasound; 2015; 4(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25789281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic yield of the SharkCore EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy.
Fitzpatrick MJ; Hernandez-Barco YG; Krishnan K; Brugge W; Casey B; Pitman MB
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(4):212-219. PubMed ID: 31076375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Initial experience with a novel EUS-guided core biopsy needle (SharkCore): results of a large North American multicenter study.
DiMaio CJ; Kolb JM; Benias PC; Shah H; Shah S; Haluszka O; Maranki J; Sharzehi K; Lam E; Gordon SR; Hyder SM; Kaimakliotis PZ; Allaparthi SB; Gress FG; Sethi A; Shah AR; Nieto J; Kaul V; Kothari S; Kothari TH; Ho S; Izzy MJ; Sharma NR; Watson RR; Muthusamy VR; Pleskow DK; Berzin TM; Sawhney M; Aljahdi E; Ryou M; Wong CK; Gupta P; Yang D; Gonzalez S; Adler DG
Endosc Int Open; 2016 Sep; 4(9):E974-9. PubMed ID: 27652304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A pilot study of EUS-guided through-the-needle forceps biopsy (with video).
Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Mizuno S; Mohri D; Kogure H; Matsubara S; Tada M; Koike K
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jul; 84(1):158-62. PubMed ID: 26772889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microscopic findings in EUS-guided fine needle (SharkCore) biopsies with type 1 and type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis.
Detlefsen S; Joergensen MT; Mortensen MB
Pathol Int; 2017 Oct; 67(10):514-520. PubMed ID: 28868649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid mass lesions of the pancreas: A retrospective comparison study of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy.
Sweeney J; Soong L; Goyal A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 31903736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration of lymph nodes and solid masses: factors influencing the cellularity and adequacy of the aspirate.
Wee E; Lakhtakia S; Gupta R; Sekaran A; Kalapala R; Monga A; Arjunan S; Reddy DN
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Jul; 46(6):487-93. PubMed ID: 22688144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
