These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29624443)

  • 1. Interpersonal Communication Motives for Flirting Face to Face and Through Texting.
    Punyanunt-Carter NM; Wagner TR
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2018 Apr; 21(4):229-233. PubMed ID: 29624443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In-person contact begets calling and texting: interpersonal motives for cell phone use, face-to-face interaction, and loneliness.
    Jin B; Park N
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2010 Dec; 13(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 21142985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gender differences in psychosocial predictors of texting while driving.
    Struckman-Johnson C; Gaster S; Struckman-Johnson D; Johnson M; May-Shinagle G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():218-28. PubMed ID: 25463963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. College students' use of technology to communicate with romantic partners about sexual health issues.
    Tannebaum M
    J Am Coll Health; 2018 Jul; 66(5):393-400. PubMed ID: 29447621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between students' self-reported aggressive communication and motives to communicate with their instructors.
    Edwards C; Myers SA
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Feb; 106(1):131-3. PubMed ID: 20402435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To Communicate or Not to Communicate: Factors Predicting Passengers' Intentions to Ask a Driver to Stop Text Messaging While Driving.
    Wang X
    Health Commun; 2016; 31(5):617-25. PubMed ID: 26452401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting risky sexual behaviors among college student drinkers as a function of event-level drinking motives and alcohol use.
    Kilwein TM; Looby A
    Addict Behav; 2018 Jan; 76():100-105. PubMed ID: 28777973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender differences in heterosexual college students' conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education.
    Jozkowski KN; Peterson ZD; Sanders SA; Dennis B; Reece M
    J Sex Res; 2014; 51(8):904-16. PubMed ID: 23919322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Courtship communication and perception.
    Moore MM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Feb; 94(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 11883596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire-Revised across US and Portuguese college students.
    Martin JL; Ferreira JA; Haase RF; Martins J; Coelho M
    Addict Behav; 2016 Sep; 60():58-63. PubMed ID: 27092996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study exploring factors of decision to text while walking among college students based on Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB).
    Koh H; Mackert M
    J Am Coll Health; 2016; 64(8):619-627. PubMed ID: 27448769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motives underlying smoking in college students with ADHD.
    Murphy KG; Flory K
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2017 May; 43(3):350-359. PubMed ID: 27494646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Communication competence, social support, and depression among college students: a model of facebook and face-to-face support network influence.
    Wright KB; Rosenberg J; Egbert N; Ploeger NA; Bernard DR; King S
    J Health Commun; 2013; 18(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 23030518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do drinking motives distinguish extreme drinking college students from their peers?
    White HR; Anderson KG; Ray AE; Mun EY
    Addict Behav; 2016 Sep; 60():213-8. PubMed ID: 27163187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Communication accommodation in text messages: Exploring liking, power, and sex as predictors of textisms.
    Adams A; Miles J; Dunbar NE; Giles H
    J Soc Psychol; 2018; 158(4):474-490. PubMed ID: 29297763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Gender Comparison of Motivations for Physical Dating Violence Among College Students.
    Elmquist J; Wolford-Clevenger C; Zapor H; Febres J; Shorey RC; Hamel J; Stuart GL
    J Interpers Violence; 2016 Jan; 31(1):186-203. PubMed ID: 25392388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explaining the use of text-based communication media: an examination of three theories of media use.
    Park N; Chung JE; Lee S
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2012 Jul; 15(7):357-63. PubMed ID: 22780995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mating Performance: Assessing Flirting Skills, Mate Signal-Detection Ability, and Shyness Effects.
    Apostolou M; Papadopoulou I; Christofi M; Vrontis D
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(3):1474704919872416. PubMed ID: 31542947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Negative affect as a moderator of the relationship between hookup motives and hookup consequences.
    Montes KS; Napper LE; Froidevaux NM; Kenney S; LaBrie JW
    J Am Coll Health; 2016; 64(8):668-672. PubMed ID: 27455409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Associations among text messaging, academic performance, and sexual behaviors of adolescents.
    Perry RC; Braun RA; Cantu M; Dudovitz RN; Sheoran B; Chung PJ
    J Sch Health; 2014 Jan; 84(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 24320150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.