327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29624705)
1. Genomic breeding values, SNP effects and gene identification for disease traits in cow training sets.
Naderi S; Bohlouli M; Yin T; König S
Anim Genet; 2018 Jun; 49(3):178-192. PubMed ID: 29624705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
Naderi S; Yin T; König S
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic analyses of claw disorders in Holstein cows: Genetic parameters, trait associations, and genome-wide associations considering interactions of SNP and heat stress.
Sölzer N; May K; Yin T; König S
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Oct; 105(10):8218-8236. PubMed ID: 36028345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phenotypic, genetic, and single nucleotide polymorphism marker associations between calf diseases and subsequent performance and disease occurrences of first-lactation German Holstein cows.
Mahmoud M; Yin T; Brügemann K; König S
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Mar; 100(3):2017-2031. PubMed ID: 28109590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of using cow genomic information on accuracy and bias of genomic breeding values in a simulated Holstein dairy cattle population.
Dehnavi E; Mahyari SA; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5166-5176. PubMed ID: 29605309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Heritabilities and genetic correlations in the same traits across different strata of herds created according to continuous genomic, genetic, and phenotypic descriptors.
Yin T; König S
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Mar; 101(3):2171-2186. PubMed ID: 29248231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic evaluations for endangered dual-purpose German Black Pied cattle using 50K SNPs, a breed-specific 200K chip, and whole-genome sequencing.
Wolf MJ; Neumann GB; Kokuć P; Yin T; Brockmann GA; König S; May K
J Dairy Sci; 2023 May; 106(5):3345-3358. PubMed ID: 37028956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Opportunities for genomic selection of cheese-making traits in Montbéliarde cows.
Sanchez MP; Tribout T; Fritz S; Wolf V; Laithier C; Brochard M; Boichard D
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5206-5220. PubMed ID: 35450715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proofs for genotype by environment interactions considering pedigree and genomic data from organic and conventional cow reference populations.
Shabalina T; Yin T; May K; König S
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4452-4466. PubMed ID: 33589254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracies of genomic prediction of feed efficiency traits using different prediction and validation methods in an experimental Nelore cattle population.
Silva RM; Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Magalhães AF; Irano N; Carvalheiro R; Canesin RC; Mercadante ME; Boligon AA; Baldi FS; Misztal I; Albuquerque LG
J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3613-3623. PubMed ID: 27898889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functionally prioritised whole-genome sequence variants improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for heat tolerance.
Cheruiyot EK; Haile-Mariam M; Cocks BG; MacLeod IM; Mrode R; Pryce JE
Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Feb; 54(1):17. PubMed ID: 35183109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cow genotyping strategies for genomic selection in a small dairy cattle population.
Jenko J; Wiggans GR; Cooper TA; Eaglen SAE; Luff WGL; Bichard M; Pong-Wong R; Woolliams JA
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):439-452. PubMed ID: 27837974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genome-wide association study for claw disorders and trimming status in dairy cattle.
van der Spek D; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Feb; 98(2):1286-95. PubMed ID: 25497826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
