These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29625619)

  • 1. Mapping the lack of public initiative against female genital mutilation in Denmark.
    Christoffersen GM; Bruhn PJ; de Neergaard R; Engel S; Naeser V
    Reprod Health; 2018 Apr; 15(1):59. PubMed ID: 29625619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of primary healthcare professionals to female genital mutilation in Valencia, Spain: are we ready for this challenge?
    González-Timoneda A; Ruiz Ros V; González-Timoneda M; Cano Sánchez A
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jul; 18(1):579. PubMed ID: 30041654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Epidemiology, Regional Characteristics, Knowledge, and Attitude Toward Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in Southern Iran.
    Dehghankhalili M; Fallahi S; Mahmudi F; Ghaffarpasand F; Shahrzad ME; Taghavi M; Fereydooni Asl M
    J Sex Med; 2015 Jul; 12(7):1577-83. PubMed ID: 26139452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based policy responses to strengthen health, community and legislative systems that care for women in Australia with female genital mutilation / cutting.
    Varol N; Hall JJ; Black K; Turkmani S; Dawson A
    Reprod Health; 2017 May; 14(1):63. PubMed ID: 28521830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combating female genital mutilation: an agenda for the next decade.
    Dorkenoo E
    World Health Stat Q; 1996; 49(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 9050193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimates of first-generation women and girls with female genital mutilation in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland.
    Van Baelen L; Ortensi L; Leye E
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2016 Dec; 21(6):474-482. PubMed ID: 27652839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender equality and human rights approaches to female genital mutilation: a review of international human rights norms and standards.
    Khosla R; Banerjee J; Chou D; Say L; Fried ST
    Reprod Health; 2017 May; 14(1):59. PubMed ID: 28499386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health sector involvement in the management of female genital mutilation/cutting in 30 countries.
    Johansen REB; Ziyada MM; Shell-Duncan B; Kaplan AM; Leye E
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 18(1):240. PubMed ID: 29615033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An exploration of attitudes towards female genital mutilation (FGM) in men and women accessing FGM clinical services in London: a pilot study.
    Larsson M; Cohen P; Hann G; Creighton SM; Hodes D
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Oct; 38(7):1005-1009. PubMed ID: 29560774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What do we know about assessing healthcare students and professionals' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding female genital mutilation? A systematic review.
    Abdulcadir J; Say L; Pallitto C
    Reprod Health; 2017 May; 14(1):64. PubMed ID: 28532515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using electronic maternity records to estimate female genital mutilation in Lothian from 2010 to 2013.
    Ford CM; Darlow K; Massie A; Gorman DR
    Eur J Public Health; 2018 Aug; 28(4):657-661. PubMed ID: 29596591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The culture of female circumcision.
    Morris R
    ANS Adv Nurs Sci; 1996 Dec; 19(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 8939287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Female genital mutilation/cutting: going beyond urogynecologic complications and obstetric outcomes.
    Libretti A; Bianco G; Corsini C; Remorgida V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Oct; 308(4):1067-1074. PubMed ID: 36703012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: a situation analysis.
    De Schrijver L; Van Baelen L; Van Eekert N; Leye E
    Reprod Health; 2020 Jul; 17(1):105. PubMed ID: 32641062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals' knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice.
    Zurynski Y; Sureshkumar P; Phu A; Elliott E
    BMC Int Health Hum Rights; 2015 Dec; 15():32. PubMed ID: 26652275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A mixed-method synthesis of knowledge, experiences and attitudes of health professionals to Female Genital Mutilation.
    Reig-Alcaraz M; Siles-González J; Solano-Ruiz C
    J Adv Nurs; 2016 Feb; 72(2):245-60. PubMed ID: 26434563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 6000 girls at risk every day. Female genital mutilation, although illegal, is still widely practiced.
    Darkenoo E
    Womens Health Newsl; 1993 Nov; (20):10-1. PubMed ID: 12222518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changing prevalence and factors associated with female genital mutilation in Ethiopia: Data from the 2000, 2005 and 2016 national demographic health surveys.
    Azeze GA; Williams A; Tweya H; Obsa MS; Mokonnon TM; Kanche ZZ; Fite RO; Harries AD
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238495. PubMed ID: 32881931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attitudes towards and health consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting: A qualitative study among Somali and Kurdish immigrants and descendants in Denmark.
    Linde DS; Harakow HI; Jaafar N
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2024 Jun; 22():100315. PubMed ID: 38828211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preventing female genital mutilation in high income countries: a systematic review of the evidence.
    Njue C; Karumbi J; Esho T; Varol N; Dawson A
    Reprod Health; 2019 Jul; 16(1):113. PubMed ID: 31331357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.