188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29625871)
1. NGS-based likelihood ratio for identifying contributors in two- and three-person DNA mixtures.
Chan Mun Wei J; Zhao Z; Li SC; Ng YK
Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Jun; 74():428-433. PubMed ID: 29625871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the LUS in sequence allele designations to facilitate probabilistic genotyping of NGS-based STR typing results.
Just RS; Irwin JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():197-205. PubMed ID: 29525576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Massively parallel sequencing of 17 commonly used forensic autosomal STRs and amelogenin with small amplicons.
Kim EH; Lee HY; Yang IS; Jung SE; Yang WI; Shin KJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():1-7. PubMed ID: 26799314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpreting Mixture Profiles: Comparison between Precision ID GlobalFiler™ NGS STR Panel v2 and Traditional Methods.
Ragazzo M; Carboni S; Caputo V; Buttini C; Manzo L; Errichiello V; Puleri G; Giardina E
Genes (Basel); 2020 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 32466613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Search for More Effective Microsatellite Markers for Forensics With Next-Generation Sequencing.
Tan B; Zhao Z; Zhang Z; Li S; Li SC
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2017 Jul; 16(5):375-381. PubMed ID: 28600257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx Forensic Genomics System for Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in Forensic DNA Casework and Database Laboratories.
Jäger AC; Alvarez ML; Davis CP; Guzmán E; Han Y; Way L; Walichiewicz P; Silva D; Pham N; Caves G; Bruand J; Schlesinger F; Pond SJK; Varlaro J; Stephens KM; Holt CL
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():52-70. PubMed ID: 28171784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. My-Forensic-Loci-queries (MyFLq) framework for analysis of forensic STR data generated by massive parallel sequencing.
Van Neste C; Vandewoestyne M; Van Criekinge W; Deforce D; Van Nieuwerburgh F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():1-8. PubMed ID: 24528572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expanding beyond the current core STR loci: An exploration of 73 STR markers with increased diversity for enhanced DNA mixture deconvolution.
Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; Woerner AE; Bus MM; Coble M; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():121-129. PubMed ID: 30396008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facilitating complex DNA mixture interpretation by sequencing highly polymorphic haplotypes.
Voskoboinik L; Motro U; Darvasi A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():136-140. PubMed ID: 29775859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating number of contributors in massively parallel sequencing data of STR loci.
Young BA; Gettings KB; McCord B; Vallone PM
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():15-22. PubMed ID: 30312966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resolution of mitochondrial DNA mixtures using a probe capture next generation sequencing system and phylogenetic-based software.
Wisner M; Erlich H; Shih S; Calloway C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102531. PubMed ID: 34052577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhanced mixture interpretation with macrohaplotypes based on long-read DNA sequencing.
Ge J; King J; Mandape S; Budowle B
Int J Legal Med; 2021 Nov; 135(6):2189-2198. PubMed ID: 34378071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examination of the usefulness of next-generation sequencing in mixed DNA samples.
Momota F; Tsuji A; Ishiko A; Ikeda N
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2021 Jul; 51():101874. PubMed ID: 33930717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying the most likely contributors to a Y-STR mixture using the discrete Laplace method.
Andersen MM; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Mar; 15():76-83. PubMed ID: 25303788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of the number of contributors of theoretical mixture profiles based on allele counting: Does increasing the number of loci increase success rate of estimates?
Dembinski GM; Sobieralski C; Picard CJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():24-32. PubMed ID: 29175725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Next generation sequencing of SNPs using the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Identity Panel on the Ion Torrent PGM™ platform.
Guo F; Zhou Y; Song H; Zhao J; Shen H; Zhao B; Liu F; Jiang X
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():73-84. PubMed ID: 27500651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interpreting Y chromosome STR haplotype mixture.
Ge J; Budowle B; Chakraborty R
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2010 May; 12(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 20346725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. STRScan: targeted profiling of short tandem repeats in whole-genome sequencing data.
Tang H; Nzabarushimana E
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 18(Suppl 11):398. PubMed ID: 28984185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identifying contributors of DNA mixtures by means of quantitative information of STR typing.
Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
J Comput Biol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):887-902. PubMed ID: 21210742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
