These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29625871)
1. NGS-based likelihood ratio for identifying contributors in two- and three-person DNA mixtures. Chan Mun Wei J; Zhao Z; Li SC; Ng YK Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Jun; 74():428-433. PubMed ID: 29625871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the LUS in sequence allele designations to facilitate probabilistic genotyping of NGS-based STR typing results. Just RS; Irwin JA Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():197-205. PubMed ID: 29525576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Massively parallel sequencing of 17 commonly used forensic autosomal STRs and amelogenin with small amplicons. Kim EH; Lee HY; Yang IS; Jung SE; Yang WI; Shin KJ Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():1-7. PubMed ID: 26799314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Search for More Effective Microsatellite Markers for Forensics With Next-Generation Sequencing. Tan B; Zhao Z; Zhang Z; Li S; Li SC IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2017 Jul; 16(5):375-381. PubMed ID: 28600257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx Forensic Genomics System for Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in Forensic DNA Casework and Database Laboratories. Jäger AC; Alvarez ML; Davis CP; Guzmán E; Han Y; Way L; Walichiewicz P; Silva D; Pham N; Caves G; Bruand J; Schlesinger F; Pond SJK; Varlaro J; Stephens KM; Holt CL Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():52-70. PubMed ID: 28171784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interpreting Mixture Profiles: Comparison between Precision ID GlobalFiler™ NGS STR Panel v2 and Traditional Methods. Ragazzo M; Carboni S; Caputo V; Buttini C; Manzo L; Errichiello V; Puleri G; Giardina E Genes (Basel); 2020 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 32466613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved individual identification in DNA mixtures of unrelated or related contributors through massively parallel sequencing. Liu Z; Wu E; Li R; Liu J; Zang Y; Cong B; Wu R; Xie B; Sun H Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Sep; 72():103078. PubMed ID: 38889491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. My-Forensic-Loci-queries (MyFLq) framework for analysis of forensic STR data generated by massive parallel sequencing. Van Neste C; Vandewoestyne M; Van Criekinge W; Deforce D; Van Nieuwerburgh F Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():1-8. PubMed ID: 24528572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Expanding beyond the current core STR loci: An exploration of 73 STR markers with increased diversity for enhanced DNA mixture deconvolution. Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; Woerner AE; Bus MM; Coble M; Budowle B Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():121-129. PubMed ID: 30396008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Facilitating complex DNA mixture interpretation by sequencing highly polymorphic haplotypes. Voskoboinik L; Motro U; Darvasi A Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():136-140. PubMed ID: 29775859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating number of contributors in massively parallel sequencing data of STR loci. Young BA; Gettings KB; McCord B; Vallone PM Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():15-22. PubMed ID: 30312966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Resolution of mitochondrial DNA mixtures using a probe capture next generation sequencing system and phylogenetic-based software. Wisner M; Erlich H; Shih S; Calloway C Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102531. PubMed ID: 34052577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced mixture interpretation with macrohaplotypes based on long-read DNA sequencing. Ge J; King J; Mandape S; Budowle B Int J Legal Med; 2021 Nov; 135(6):2189-2198. PubMed ID: 34378071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examination of the usefulness of next-generation sequencing in mixed DNA samples. Momota F; Tsuji A; Ishiko A; Ikeda N Leg Med (Tokyo); 2021 Jul; 51():101874. PubMed ID: 33930717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identifying the most likely contributors to a Y-STR mixture using the discrete Laplace method. Andersen MM; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Mar; 15():76-83. PubMed ID: 25303788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of the number of contributors of theoretical mixture profiles based on allele counting: Does increasing the number of loci increase success rate of estimates? Dembinski GM; Sobieralski C; Picard CJ Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():24-32. PubMed ID: 29175725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Next generation sequencing of SNPs using the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Identity Panel on the Ion Torrent PGM™ platform. Guo F; Zhou Y; Song H; Zhao J; Shen H; Zhao B; Liu F; Jiang X Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():73-84. PubMed ID: 27500651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interpreting Y chromosome STR haplotype mixture. Ge J; Budowle B; Chakraborty R Leg Med (Tokyo); 2010 May; 12(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 20346725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. STRScan: targeted profiling of short tandem repeats in whole-genome sequencing data. Tang H; Nzabarushimana E BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 18(Suppl 11):398. PubMed ID: 28984185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]