198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29626082)
1. diploS/HIC: An Updated Approach to Classifying Selective Sweeps.
Kern AD; Schrider DR
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 May; 8(6):1959-1970. PubMed ID: 29626082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discovery of Ongoing Selective Sweeps within Anopheles Mosquito Populations Using Deep Learning.
Xue AT; Schrider DR; Kern AD;
Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Mar; 38(3):1168-1183. PubMed ID: 33022051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. S/HIC: Robust Identification of Soft and Hard Sweeps Using Machine Learning.
Schrider DR; Kern AD
PLoS Genet; 2016 Mar; 12(3):e1005928. PubMed ID: 26977894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection and Classification of Hard and Soft Sweeps from Unphased Genotypes by Multilocus Genotype Identity.
Harris AM; Garud NR; DeGiorgio M
Genetics; 2018 Dec; 210(4):1429-1452. PubMed ID: 30315068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the Unfounded Enthusiasm for Soft Selective Sweeps III: The Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm That Isn't.
Elhaik E; Graur D
Genes (Basel); 2021 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 33916341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Soft Sweeps Are the Dominant Mode of Adaptation in the Human Genome.
Schrider DR; Kern AD
Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Aug; 34(8):1863-1877. PubMed ID: 28482049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying targets of selection in mosaic genomes with machine learning: applications in Anopheles gambiae for detecting sites within locally adapted chromosomal inversions.
He Q; Knowles LL
Mol Ecol; 2016 May; 25(10):2226-43. PubMed ID: 26994406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recent selective sweeps in North American Drosophila melanogaster show signatures of soft sweeps.
Garud NR; Messer PW; Buzbas EO; Petrov DA
PLoS Genet; 2015 Feb; 11(2):e1005004. PubMed ID: 25706129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Bayesian heterogeneous analysis of variance approach to inferring recent selective sweeps.
Marshall JM; Weiss RE
Genetics; 2006 Aug; 173(4):2357-70. PubMed ID: 16751672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hierarchical boosting: a machine-learning framework to detect and classify hard selective sweeps in human populations.
Pybus M; Luisi P; Dall'Olio GM; Uzkudun M; Laayouni H; Bertranpetit J; Engelken J
Bioinformatics; 2015 Dec; 31(24):3946-52. PubMed ID: 26315912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detecting Positive Selection in Populations Using Genetic Data.
Koropoulis A; Alachiotis N; Pavlidis P
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():87-123. PubMed ID: 31975165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The pitfalls and virtues of population genetic summary statistics: Detecting selective sweeps in recent divergences.
Schneider K; White TJ; Mitchell S; Adams CE; Reeve R; Elmer KR
J Evol Biol; 2021 Jun; 34(6):893-909. PubMed ID: 33185292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Deep-Learning Approach for Inference of Selective Sweeps from the Ancestral Recombination Graph.
Hejase HA; Mo Z; Campagna L; Siepel A
Mol Biol Evol; 2022 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 34888675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Machine-Learning Prospects for Detecting Selection Signatures Using Population Genomics Data.
Kumar H; Panigrahi M; Panwar A; Rajawat D; Nayak SS; Saravanan KA; Kaisa K; Parida S; Bhushan B; Dutt T
J Comput Biol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):943-960. PubMed ID: 35639362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Soft shoulders ahead: spurious signatures of soft and partial selective sweeps result from linked hard sweeps.
Schrider DR; Mendes FK; Hahn MW; Kern AD
Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 25716978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Domain-adaptive neural networks improve supervised machine learning based on simulated population genetic data.
Mo Z; Siepel A
PLoS Genet; 2023 Nov; 19(11):e1011032. PubMed ID: 37934781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data.
Garud NR; Messer PW; Petrov DA
PLoS Genet; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1009373. PubMed ID: 33635910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deep Learning for Population Genetic Inference.
Sheehan S; Song YS
PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Mar; 12(3):e1004845. PubMed ID: 27018908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A haplotype method detects diverse scenarios of local adaptation from genomic sequence variation.
Lange JD; Pool JE
Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3081-100. PubMed ID: 27135633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maximum SNP FST Outperforms Full-Window Statistics for Detecting Soft Sweeps in Local Adaptation.
da Silva Ribeiro T; Galván JA; Pool JE
Genome Biol Evol; 2022 Oct; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 36152314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
