These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29626169)

  • 1. On the Flexibility of Basic Risk Attitudes in Monkeys.
    Farashahi S; Azab H; Hayden B; Soltani A
    J Neurosci; 2018 May; 38(18):4383-4398. PubMed ID: 29626169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probability Distortion Depends on Choice Sequence in Rhesus Monkeys.
    Ferrari-Toniolo S; Bujold PM; Schultz W
    J Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 39(15):2915-2929. PubMed ID: 30705103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The adaptive value of probability distortion and risk-seeking in macaques' decision-making.
    Nioche A; Rougier NP; Deffains M; Bourgeois-Gironde S; Ballesta S; Boraud T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Mar; 376(1819):20190668. PubMed ID: 33423627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Missed losses loom larger than missed gains: Electrodermal reactivity to decision choices and outcomes in a gambling task.
    Wu Y; Van Dijk E; Aitken M; Clark L
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):353-61. PubMed ID: 26667365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primate anterior insular cortex represents economic decision variables proposed by prospect theory.
    Yang YP; Li X; Stuphorn V
    Nat Commun; 2022 Feb; 13(1):717. PubMed ID: 35132070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing utility functions between risky and riskless choice in rhesus monkeys.
    Bujold PM; Seak LCU; Schultz W; Ferrari-Toniolo S
    Anim Cogn; 2022 Apr; 25(2):385-399. PubMed ID: 34568979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic choices reveal probability distortion in macaque monkeys.
    Stauffer WR; Lak A; Bossaerts P; Schultz W
    J Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 35(7):3146-54. PubMed ID: 25698750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dopaminergic Drug Effects on Probability Weighting during Risky Decision Making.
    Ojala KE; Janssen LK; Hashemi MM; Timmer MHM; Geurts DEM; Ter Huurne NP; Cools R; Sescousse G
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29632870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An asymmetry of treatment between lotteries involving gains and losses in rhesus monkeys.
    Nioche A; Bourgeois-Gironde S; Boraud T
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10441. PubMed ID: 31320725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Risk and Ambiguity Attitudes.
    Blankenstein NE; Peper JS; Crone EA; van Duijvenvoorde ACK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 29(11):1845-1859. PubMed ID: 28686139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Divergence and Convergence of Risky Decision Making Across Prospective Gains and Losses: Preferences and Strategies.
    Kurnianingsih YA; Mullette-Gillman OA
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():457. PubMed ID: 26733779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The description-experience gap in risky choice in nonhuman primates.
    Heilbronner SR; Hayden BY
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):593-600. PubMed ID: 26286883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Salience-Driven Value Construction for Adaptive Choice under Risk.
    Spitmaan M; Chu E; Soltani A
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 39(26):5195-5209. PubMed ID: 31023835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk-seeking for losses is associated with 5-HTTLPR, but not with transient changes in 5-HT levels.
    Neukam PT; Kroemer NB; Deza Araujo YI; Hellrung L; Pooseh S; Rietschel M; Witt SH; Schwarzenbolz U; Henle T; Smolka MN
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Jul; 235(7):2151-2165. PubMed ID: 29730700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cocaine and HIV are independently associated with neural activation in response to gain and loss valuation during economic risky choice.
    Meade CS; Addicott M; Hobkirk AL; Towe SL; Chen NK; Sridharan S; Huettel SA
    Addict Biol; 2018 Mar; 23(2):796-809. PubMed ID: 28682013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Positive and Negative Feedback on Risk-Taking across Different Contexts.
    Losecaat Vermeer AB; Sanfey AG
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139010. PubMed ID: 26407298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural mechanisms underlying context-dependent shifts in risk preferences.
    Losecaat Vermeer AB; Boksem MAS; Sanfey AG
    Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():355-363. PubMed ID: 25281799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonhuman Primates Satisfy Utility Maximization in Compliance with the Continuity Axiom of Expected Utility Theory.
    Ferrari-Toniolo S; Bujold PM; Grabenhorst F; Báez-Mendoza R; Schultz W
    J Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 41(13):2964-2979. PubMed ID: 33542082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gambling in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): The effect of cues signaling risky choice outcomes.
    Smith TR; Beran MJ; Young ME
    Learn Behav; 2017 Sep; 45(3):288-299. PubMed ID: 28421468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dopamine D3 Receptors Modulate the Ability of Win-Paired Cues to Increase Risky Choice in a Rat Gambling Task.
    Barrus MM; Winstanley CA
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(3):785-94. PubMed ID: 26791209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.