These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29626297)

  • 1. Effects of feedback reliability on feedback-related brain activity: A feedback valuation account.
    Ernst B; Steinhauser M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 18(3):596-608. PubMed ID: 29626297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Top-down control over feedback processing: The probability of valid feedback affects feedback-related brain activity.
    Ernst B; Steinhauser M
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Jul; 115():33-40. PubMed ID: 28407527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential effects of instructed and objective feedback reliability on feedback-related brain activity.
    Di Gregorio F; Ernst B; Steinhauser M
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Sep; 56(9):e13399. PubMed ID: 31131923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How we learn to make decisions: rapid propagation of reinforcement learning prediction errors in humans.
    Krigolson OE; Hassall CD; Handy TC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):635-44. PubMed ID: 24168216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An electrophysiological monetary incentive delay (e-MID) task: a way to decompose the different components of neural response to positive and negative monetary reinforcement.
    Broyd SJ; Richards HJ; Helps SK; Chronaki G; Bamford S; Sonuga-Barke EJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Jul; 209(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 22659003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of learning on feedback-related brain potentials in a decision-making task.
    Sailer U; Fischmeister FP; Bauer H
    Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 1342():85-93. PubMed ID: 20423704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oscillatory profiles of positive, negative and neutral feedback stimuli during adaptive decision making.
    Li P; Baker TE; Warren C; Li H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Sep; 107():37-43. PubMed ID: 27378537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Higher incentives can impair performance: neural evidence on reinforcement and rationality.
    Achtziger A; Alós-Ferrer C; Hügelschäfer S; Steinhauser M
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1477-83. PubMed ID: 25816816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of internal models on feedback-related brain activity.
    Wurm F; Ernst B; Steinhauser M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 20(5):1070-1089. PubMed ID: 32812148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal dynamics of prediction error processing during reward-based decision making.
    Philiastides MG; Biele G; Vavatzanidis N; Kazzer P; Heekeren HR
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 53(1):221-32. PubMed ID: 20510376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual Salience and Reward Both Influence Feedback-Related Neural Activity Arising from Choice.
    Lou B; Hsu WY; Sajda P
    J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(38):13064-75. PubMed ID: 26400937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice.
    Yeung N; Holroyd CB; Cohen JD
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 May; 15(5):535-44. PubMed ID: 15319308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological correlates reflect the integration of model-based and model-free decision information.
    Eppinger B; Walter M; Li SC
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 17(2):406-421. PubMed ID: 28050805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conceptual Knowledge Influences Decision Making Differently in Individuals with High or Low Cognitive Flexibility: An ERP Study.
    Dong X; Du X; Qi B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0158875. PubMed ID: 27479484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinforcement learning signals predict future decisions.
    Cohen MX; Ranganath C
    J Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 27(2):371-8. PubMed ID: 17215398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An electrophysiological analysis of coaching in Blackjack.
    Hewig J; Trippe RH; Hecht H; Coles MG; Holroyd CB; Miltner WH
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1197-205. PubMed ID: 18761133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Executive control- and reward-related neural processes associated with the opportunity to engage in voluntary dishonest moral decision making.
    Hu X; Pornpattananangkul N; Nusslock R
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 15(2):475-91. PubMed ID: 25645507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neurophysiological evidence for evaluative feedback processing depending on goal relevance.
    Severo MC; Paul K; Walentowska W; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jul; 215():116857. PubMed ID: 32304885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When theory and biology differ: The relationship between reward prediction errors and expectancy.
    Williams CC; Hassall CD; Trska R; Holroyd CB; Krigolson OE
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Oct; 129():265-272. PubMed ID: 28923360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning-related changes in brain activity following errors and performance feedback in schizophrenia.
    Morris SE; Heerey EA; Gold JM; Holroyd CB
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Feb; 99(1-3):274-85. PubMed ID: 17889510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.