These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29626405)

  • 1. Best of Both Worlds Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Needham C
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Apr; 7(4):356-358. PubMed ID: 29626405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. It Takes Two to Tango: Customization and Standardization as Colluding Logics in Healthcare Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Greenfield D; Eljiz K; Butler-Henderson K
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Feb; 7(2):183-185. PubMed ID: 29524942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Competing Logics and Healthcare Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Saks M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Apr; 7(4):359-361. PubMed ID: 29626406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. (Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare.
    Mannion R; Exworthy M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2017 Jun; 6(6):301-304. PubMed ID: 28812821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Providers and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Ansmann L; Pfaff H
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Apr; 7(4):349-352. PubMed ID: 29626403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personalisation - An Emergent Institutional Logic in Healthcare? Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Ferlie E
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Jan; 7(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 29325410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward Customized Care Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Minvielle E
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Mar; 7(3):272-274. PubMed ID: 29524957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informing health? Negotiating the logics of choice and care in everyday practices of 'healthy living'.
    Henwood F; Harris R; Spoel P
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 Jun; 72(12):2026-32. PubMed ID: 21624728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Managing death: navigating divergent logics in end-of-life care.
    Bailey S; Hodgson D; Lennie SJ; Bresnen M; Hyde P
    Sociol Health Illn; 2020 Jul; 42(6):1277-1295. PubMed ID: 32374434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complementary and Alternative Medicine legitimation efforts in a hostile environment: The case of Portugal.
    Bicho M; Nikolaeva R; Lages C
    Sociol Health Illn; 2023 May; 45(4):890-913. PubMed ID: 36814085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardization vs Customization: Finding the Right Balance.
    Sinsky CA; Bavafa H; Roberts RG; Beasley JW
    Ann Fam Med; 2021; 19(2):171-177. PubMed ID: 33685879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value configurations for balancing standardization and customization in chronic care: a qualitative study.
    Colldén C; Hellström A; Gremyr I
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Aug; 21(1):845. PubMed ID: 34416902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contract care in dentistry: sense-making of the concept and in practice when multiple institutional logics are at play.
    Ulfsdotter Eriksson Y; Berg K; Boman UW; Hakeberg M
    Sociol Health Illn; 2017 Sep; 39(7):1035-1049. PubMed ID: 28332206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Between a logic of disruption and a logic of continuation: Negotiating the legitimacy of algorithms used in automated clinical decision-making.
    Torenholt R; Langstrup H
    Health (London); 2023 Jan; 27(1):41-59. PubMed ID: 33685260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neither magic bullet nor a mere tool: negotiating multiple logics of the checklist in healthcare quality improvement.
    Kocman D; Stöckelová T; Pearse R; Martin G
    Sociol Health Illn; 2019 May; 41(4):755-771. PubMed ID: 30740708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Competing and coexisting logics in the changing field of English general medical practice.
    McDonald R; Cheraghi-Sohi S; Bayes S; Morriss R; Kai J
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Sep; 93():47-54. PubMed ID: 23906120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "It can be challenging, it can be scary, it can be gratifying": Obstetricians' narratives of negotiating patient choice, clinical experience, and standards of care in decision-making.
    Diamond-Brown L
    Soc Sci Med; 2018 May; 205():48-54. PubMed ID: 29635190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Public health care in Europe: moral aspirations, ideological obsessions, and structural pitfalls in a post-enlightenment culture.
    Azguridienė G; Delkeskamp-Hayes C
    J Med Philos; 2015 Apr; 40(2):221-62. PubMed ID: 25676731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contradicting logics in everyday practice.
    Kristiansen M; Obstfelder A; Lotherington AT
    J Health Organ Manag; 2016; 30(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 26964849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.