These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29626406)

  • 1. Competing Logics and Healthcare Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Saks M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Apr; 7(4):359-361. PubMed ID: 29626406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. It Takes Two to Tango: Customization and Standardization as Colluding Logics in Healthcare Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Greenfield D; Eljiz K; Butler-Henderson K
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Feb; 7(2):183-185. PubMed ID: 29524942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Personalisation - An Emergent Institutional Logic in Healthcare? Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Ferlie E
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Jan; 7(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 29325410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. (Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare.
    Mannion R; Exworthy M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2017 Jun; 6(6):301-304. PubMed ID: 28812821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Providers and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Ansmann L; Pfaff H
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Apr; 7(4):349-352. PubMed ID: 29626403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Best of Both Worlds Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Needham C
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Apr; 7(4):356-358. PubMed ID: 29626405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward Customized Care Comment on "(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare".
    Minvielle E
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Mar; 7(3):272-274. PubMed ID: 29524957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Centrality and compatibility of institutional logics when introducing value-based reimbursement.
    Eriksson T; Levin LÅ; Nedlund AC
    J Health Organ Manag; 2021 Sep; 35(9):298-314. PubMed ID: 34535988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'What matters to you?' Normative integration of an intervention to promote participation of older patients with multi-morbidity - a qualitative case study.
    Oksavik JD; Aarseth T; Solbjør M; Kirchhoff R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Feb; 21(1):117. PubMed ID: 33541351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. If It Is Complex, Let It Be Complex - Dealing With Institutional Complexity in Hospitals Comment on "Dual Agency in Hospitals: What Strategies Do Managers and Physicians Apply to Reconcile Dilemmas Between Clinical and Economic Considerations?".
    Andersson T
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Oct; 11(10):2346-2348. PubMed ID: 35279038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value configurations for balancing standardization and customization in chronic care: a qualitative study.
    Colldén C; Hellström A; Gremyr I
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Aug; 21(1):845. PubMed ID: 34416902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Managing death: navigating divergent logics in end-of-life care.
    Bailey S; Hodgson D; Lennie SJ; Bresnen M; Hyde P
    Sociol Health Illn; 2020 Jul; 42(6):1277-1295. PubMed ID: 32374434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orchestration versus bookkeeping: How stakeholder pressures drive a healthcare purchaser's institutional logics.
    Noort BAC; van der Vaart T; Ahaus K
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258337. PubMed ID: 34644324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complementary and Alternative Medicine legitimation efforts in a hostile environment: The case of Portugal.
    Bicho M; Nikolaeva R; Lages C
    Sociol Health Illn; 2023 May; 45(4):890-913. PubMed ID: 36814085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Positioning the Work of Health Professions Education Scholarship Units: How Canadian Directors Harness Institutional Logics Within Institutional Orders to Convey Unit Legitimacy.
    Kahlke R; Varpio L
    Acad Med; 2019 Dec; 94(12):1988-1994. PubMed ID: 31169535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Value-based healthcare logics and their implications for Nordic health policies.
    Kokko P; Kork AA
    Health Serv Manage Res; 2021 Feb; 34(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 33167726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How logical is safety? An institutional logics perspective on safety at work.
    Cornelissen PA; Van Vuuren M; Van Hoof JJ
    Work; 2020; 66(1):135-147. PubMed ID: 32417821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Institutional Logics in the UK Construction Industry's Response to Modern Slavery Risk: Complementarity and Conflict.
    Pesterfield C; Rogerson M
    J Bus Ethics; 2023 Jun; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 37359801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Interplay of Conflicting and Complementing Institutional Logics in Sustainability Practices.
    Milosevic I; Bass AE; Schulte B
    Manag Int Rev; 2023; 63(3):469-506. PubMed ID: 37252375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Competing and coexisting logics in the changing field of English general medical practice.
    McDonald R; Cheraghi-Sohi S; Bayes S; Morriss R; Kai J
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Sep; 93():47-54. PubMed ID: 23906120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.