These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29627207)

  • 1. Comparison of clinical and electromyographic rest vertical dimensions in dolichofacial and brachyfacial young adults: A cross-sectional study.
    Manns A; Valdivieso C; Rojas V; Valdés C; Ramírez V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):513-519. PubMed ID: 29627207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mastication, EMG activity and occlusal contact area in subjects with different facial types.
    Gomes SG; Custodio W; Jufer JS; Del Bel CA; Garcia RC
    Cranio; 2010 Oct; 28(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 21032982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Masticatory features, EMG activity and muscle effort of subjects with different facial patterns.
    Gomes SG; Custodio W; Faot F; Del Bel Cury AA; Garcia RC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Nov; 37(11):813-9. PubMed ID: 20726943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in bite force between dolichofacial and brachyfacial individuals: Side of mastication, gender, weight and height.
    Quiudini PR; Pozza DH; Pinto ADS; de Arruda MF; Guimarães AS
    J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Jul; 61(3):283-289. PubMed ID: 27866879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chewing side, bite force symmetry, and occlusal contact area of subjects with different facial vertical patterns.
    Gomes SG; Custodio W; Faot F; Cury AA; Garcia RC
    Braz Oral Res; 2011; 25(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 22031059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical facial patterns: a cross-sectional study in growing children.
    Lione R; Franchi L; Noviello A; Bollero P; Fanucci E; Cozza P
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Oct; 35(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 24081727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association of facial type with possible bruxism and its related clinical features in adolescents: A cross-sectional study.
    Souza GLN; Serra-Negra JM; Prado IM; Aguiar SO; Hoffmam GFEB; Pordeus IA; Auad SM; Abreu LG
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 32888883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximum occlusal force and medial mandibular flexure in relation to vertical facial pattern: a cross-sectional study.
    Shinkai RS; Lazzari FL; Canabarro SA; Gomes M; Grossi ML; Hirakata LM; Mota EG
    Head Face Med; 2007 Apr; 3():18. PubMed ID: 17407566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occlusal force, electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles and mandibular flexure of subjects with different facial types.
    Custodio W; Gomes SG; Faot F; Garcia RC; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 19(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 21655772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Jaw mechanics in dolichofacial and brachyfacial phenotypes: A longitudinal cephalometric-based study.
    Iwasaki LR; Liu Y; Liu H; Nickel JC
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Jun; 20 Suppl 1():145-150. PubMed ID: 28643908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vertical dimension: a dynamic concept based on facial form and oropharyngeal function.
    Mack MR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Oct; 66(4):478-85. PubMed ID: 1791557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Median mandibular flexure at different mouth opening and its relation to different facial types: A prospective clinical study.
    Prasad M; Hussain MZ; Shetty SK; Kumar TA; Khaur M; George SA; Dalwai S
    J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2013 Jul; 4(2):426-30. PubMed ID: 24082745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptions of brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals with regard to the buccal corridor in different facial types.
    Pithon MM; Mata KR; Rocha KS; Costa Bdo N; Neves F; Barbosa GC; Coqueiro Rda S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014; 22(5):382-9. PubMed ID: 25466472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The therapeutic impact of the Begg technic on vertical dimension].
    Méry J; Parguel P; Mauran G
    Orthod Fr; 1989; 60 Pt 2():861-71. PubMed ID: 2490263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of airway dimensions in skeletal Class I malocclusion subjects with different vertical facial patterns.
    Flores-Blancas AP; Carruitero MJ; Flores-Mir C
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(6):35-42. PubMed ID: 29364377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship of craniofacial morphology in 3-dimensional analysis of the pharynx.
    Brasil DM; Kurita LM; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 May; 149(5):683-691.e1. PubMed ID: 27131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on brachyfacial and dolichofacial growth patterns.
    Klapper L; Navarro SF; Bowman D; Pawlowski B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 May; 101(5):425-30. PubMed ID: 1590291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Terminology of facial morphology in the vertical dimension.
    Collett AR; West VC
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Jun; 38(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 8373293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between vertical facial pattern and brain structure and shape.
    Alarcón JA; Velasco-Torres M; Rosas A; Galindo-Moreno P; Catena A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Apr; 24(4):1499-1508. PubMed ID: 32034547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Craniofacial Morphology Affects Bite Force in Patients with Painful Temporomandibular Disorders.
    Bavia PF; Vilanova LS; Garcia RC
    Braz Dent J; 2016; 27(5):619-624. PubMed ID: 27982245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.