396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29627326)
1. One percent chlorhexidine-alcohol for preventing central venous catheter-related infection during intensive chemotherapy for patients with haematologic malignancies.
Ohtake S; Takahashi H; Nakagawa M; Uchino Y; Miura K; Iriyama N; Nakayama T; Hatta Y; Takei M
J Infect Chemother; 2018 Jul; 24(7):544-548. PubMed ID: 29627326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter-related infections.
Lai NM; Lai NA; O'Riordan E; Chaiyakunapruk N; Taylor JE; Tan K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jul; 7(7):CD010140. PubMed ID: 27410189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antimicrobial dressings for the prevention of catheter-related infections in newborn infants with central venous catheters.
Lai NM; Taylor JE; Tan K; Choo YM; Ahmad Kamar A; Muhamad NA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 3(3):CD011082. PubMed ID: 27007217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined skin disinfection with chlorhexidine/propanol and aqueous povidone-iodine reduces bacterial colonisation of central venous catheters.
Langgartner J; Linde HJ; Lehn N; Reng M; Schölmerich J; Glück T
Intensive Care Med; 2004 Jun; 30(6):1081-8. PubMed ID: 15085323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective, randomized trial of two antiseptic solutions for prevention of central venous or arterial catheter colonization and infection in intensive care unit patients.
Mimoz O; Pieroni L; Lawrence C; Edouard A; Costa Y; Samii K; Brun-Buisson C
Crit Care Med; 1996 Nov; 24(11):1818-23. PubMed ID: 8917031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized trial comparing povidone-iodine to a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressing for prevention of central venous catheter infections in neonates.
Garland JS; Alex CP; Mueller CD; Otten D; Shivpuri C; Harris MC; Naples M; Pellegrini J; Buck RK; McAuliffe TL; Goldmann DA; Maki DG
Pediatrics; 2001 Jun; 107(6):1431-6. PubMed ID: 11389271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chlorhexidine plus alcohol versus povidone iodine plus alcohol, combined or not with innovative devices, for prevention of short-term peripheral venous catheter infection and failure (CLEAN 3 study): an investigator-initiated, open-label, single centre, randomised-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial.
Guenezan J; Marjanovic N; Drugeon B; Neill RO; Liuu E; Roblot F; Palazzo P; Bironneau V; Prevost F; Paul J; Pichon M; Boisson M; Frasca D; Mimoz O;
Lancet Infect Dis; 2021 Jul; 21(7):1038-1048. PubMed ID: 33539734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol, with and without skin scrubbing, for prevention of intravascular-catheter-related infection (CLEAN): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, two-by-two factorial trial.
Mimoz O; Lucet JC; Kerforne T; Pascal J; Souweine B; Goudet V; Mercat A; Bouadma L; Lasocki S; Alfandari S; Friggeri A; Wallet F; Allou N; Ruckly S; Balayn D; Lepape A; Timsit JF;
Lancet; 2015 Nov; 386(10008):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 26388532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction in catheter-related infections after switching from povidone-iodine to chlorhexidine for the exit-site care of tunneled central venous catheters in children on hemodialysis.
Paglialonga F; Consolo S; Biasuzzi A; Assomou J; Gattarello E; Patricelli MG; Giannini A; Chidini G; Napolitano L; Edefonti A
Hemodial Int; 2014 Oct; 18 Suppl 1():S13-8. PubMed ID: 25330826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alcoholic povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine-based antiseptic for the prevention of central venous catheter-related infections: in-use comparison.
Girard R; Comby C; Jacques D
J Infect Public Health; 2012 Mar; 5(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 22341841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of alcoholic chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine cutaneous antiseptics for the prevention of central venous catheter-related infection: a cohort and quasi-experimental multicenter study.
Pages J; Hazera P; Mégarbane B; du Cheyron D; Thuong M; Dutheil JJ; Valette X; Fournel F; Mermel LA; Mira JP; Daubin C; Parienti JJ;
Intensive Care Med; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1418-26. PubMed ID: 27311311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 0.05% chlorhexidine and 10% povidone-iodine as cutaneous disinfectant for prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: a comparative study.
Ishizuka M; Nagata H; Takagi K; Kubota K
Eur Surg Res; 2009; 43(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 19648751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropyl alcohol versus 10% povidone-iodine for insertion site cleaning before central line insertion in preterm infants: a randomised trial.
Kieran EA; O'Sullivan A; Miletin J; Twomey AR; Knowles SJ; O'Donnell CPF
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2018 Mar; 103(2):F101-F106. PubMed ID: 29074717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of four skin preparation strategies to prevent catheter-related infection in intensive care unit (CLEAN trial): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Goudet V; Timsit JF; Lucet JC; Lepape A; Balayn D; Seguin S; Mimoz O
Trials; 2013 Apr; 14():114. PubMed ID: 23782845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized, prospective clinical trial to assess the potential infection risk associated with the PosiFlow needleless connector.
Casey AL; Worthington T; Lambert PA; Quinn D; Faroqui MH; Elliott TS
J Hosp Infect; 2003 Aug; 54(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 12919759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chlorhexidine-based antiseptic solution vs alcohol-based povidone-iodine for central venous catheter care.
Mimoz O; Villeminey S; Ragot S; Dahyot-Fizelier C; Laksiri L; Petitpas F; Debaene B
Arch Intern Med; 2007 Oct; 167(19):2066-72. PubMed ID: 17954800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficiency of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated venous catheters at subclavian sites.
Lorente L; Lecuona M; Jiménez A; Lorenzo L; Santacreu R; Ramos S; Hurtado E; Buitrago M; Mora ML
Am J Infect Control; 2015 Jul; 43(7):711-4. PubMed ID: 25934065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of chlorhexidine gluconate compared with povidone-iodine solution for catheter-site care in Siriraj Hospital, Thailand.
Maenthaisong R; Chaiyakunapruk N; Thamlikitkul V
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Nov; 89 Suppl 5():S94-101. PubMed ID: 17718250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of 1.0% chlorhexidine-gluconate ethanol compared with 10% povidone-iodine for long-term central venous catheter care in hematology departments: a prospective study.
Yamamoto N; Kimura H; Misao H; Matsumoto H; Imafuku Y; Watanabe A; Mori H; Yoshida A; Miura S; Abe Y; Toba M; Suzuki H; Ogawa K; Kanemitsu K
Am J Infect Control; 2014 May; 42(5):574-6. PubMed ID: 24655901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chlorhexidine disinfectant can reduce the risk of central venous catheter infection compared with povidone: a meta-analysis.
Shi Y; Yang N; Zhang L; Zhang M; Pei HH; Wang H
Am J Infect Control; 2019 Oct; 47(10):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 30948152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
