These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29627818)

  • 1. Building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in NHS hospital trusts in Southeast England: a qualitative participatory evaluation.
    Lalani M; Hall K; Skrypak M; Laing C; Welch J; Toohey P; Seaholme S; Weijburg T; Eyre L; Marshall M
    BMJ Open; 2018 Apr; 8(4):e020930. PubMed ID: 29627818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revalidation and quality assurance: the application of the MUSIQ framework in independent verification visits to healthcare organisations.
    Griffin A; McKeown A; Viney R; Rich A; Welland T; Gafson I; Woolf K
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e014121. PubMed ID: 28196952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
    Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motivational drivers for health professionals in a large quality improvement collaborative project in Brazil: a qualitative study.
    da Silva EP; Saturno-Hernández PJ; de Freitas MR; da Silva Gama ZA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2024 Feb; 24(1):183. PubMed ID: 38336769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Provider Regimes in the English NHS: A Rapid Evaluation of a National Improvement Initiative for Failing Healthcare Organisations.
    Vindrola-Padros C; Ledger J; Hill M; Tomini S; Spencer J; Fulop NJ
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Dec; 11(12):2917-2926. PubMed ID: 35490260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Qualitative process evaluation of the Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP): study protocol.
    Wagstaff D; Moonesinghe SR; Fulop NJ; Vindrola-Padros C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e030214. PubMed ID: 31296515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing future clinical leaders for quality improvement: experience from a London children's hospital.
    Runnacles J; Moult B; Lachman P
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Nov; 22(11):956-63. PubMed ID: 23840073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between employee engagement scores and service quality ratings: analysis of the National Health Service staff survey across 97 acute NHS Trusts in England and concurrent Care Quality Commission outcomes (2012-2016).
    Wake M; Green W
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e026472. PubMed ID: 31320347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The external review of quality improvement in health care organizations: a qualitative study.
    Walshe K; Wallace L; Freeman T; Latham L; Spurgeon P
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2001 Oct; 13(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 11669564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What are the features of high-performing quality improvement collaboratives? A qualitative case study of a state-wide collaboratives programme.
    McGowan JG; Martin GP; Krapohl GL; Campbell DA; Englesbe MJ; Dimick JB; Dixon-Woods M
    BMJ Open; 2023 Dec; 13(12):e076648. PubMed ID: 38097243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of a safety improvement intervention in care homes in England: a participatory qualitative study.
    Marshall M; Pfeifer N; de Silva D; Wei L; Anderson J; Cruickshank L; Attreed-James K; Shand J
    J R Soc Med; 2018 Nov; 111(11):414-421. PubMed ID: 30235053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilising theories of change to understand the engagement of general practitioners in service improvement: a formative evaluation of the Lewisham Depression Programme.
    Riley AJ; Byng R; White C; Smith S
    Qual Prim Care; 2008; 16(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 18700075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What patients do and their impact on implementation.
    Boaz A; Robert G; Locock L; Sturmey G; Gager M; Vougioukalou S; Ziebland S; Fielden J
    J Health Organ Manag; 2016; 30(2):258-78. PubMed ID: 27052625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A qualitative evaluation of the barriers and facilitators toward implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist across hospitals in England: lessons from the "Surgical Checklist Implementation Project".
    Russ SJ; Sevdalis N; Moorthy K; Mayer EK; Rout S; Caris J; Mansell J; Davies R; Vincent C; Darzi A
    Ann Surg; 2015 Jan; 261(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 25072435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of quality improvement collaboratives in general practice: a qualitative systematic review.
    Knight AW; Tam CWM; Dennis S; Fraser J; Pond D
    BMJ Open Qual; 2022 May; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 35589275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. (Dis)Integrated Care? Lessons from East London.
    Bussu S; Marshall M
    Int J Integr Care; 2020 Oct; 20(4):2. PubMed ID: 33177965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.