BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29627818)

  • 1. Building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in NHS hospital trusts in Southeast England: a qualitative participatory evaluation.
    Lalani M; Hall K; Skrypak M; Laing C; Welch J; Toohey P; Seaholme S; Weijburg T; Eyre L; Marshall M
    BMJ Open; 2018 Apr; 8(4):e020930. PubMed ID: 29627818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revalidation and quality assurance: the application of the MUSIQ framework in independent verification visits to healthcare organisations.
    Griffin A; McKeown A; Viney R; Rich A; Welland T; Gafson I; Woolf K
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e014121. PubMed ID: 28196952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
    Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motivational drivers for health professionals in a large quality improvement collaborative project in Brazil: a qualitative study.
    da Silva EP; Saturno-Hernández PJ; de Freitas MR; da Silva Gama ZA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2024 Feb; 24(1):183. PubMed ID: 38336769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Provider Regimes in the English NHS: A Rapid Evaluation of a National Improvement Initiative for Failing Healthcare Organisations.
    Vindrola-Padros C; Ledger J; Hill M; Tomini S; Spencer J; Fulop NJ
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2022 Dec; 11(12):2917-2926. PubMed ID: 35490260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Qualitative process evaluation of the Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP): study protocol.
    Wagstaff D; Moonesinghe SR; Fulop NJ; Vindrola-Padros C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e030214. PubMed ID: 31296515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing future clinical leaders for quality improvement: experience from a London children's hospital.
    Runnacles J; Moult B; Lachman P
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Nov; 22(11):956-63. PubMed ID: 23840073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between employee engagement scores and service quality ratings: analysis of the National Health Service staff survey across 97 acute NHS Trusts in England and concurrent Care Quality Commission outcomes (2012-2016).
    Wake M; Green W
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e026472. PubMed ID: 31320347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The external review of quality improvement in health care organizations: a qualitative study.
    Walshe K; Wallace L; Freeman T; Latham L; Spurgeon P
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2001 Oct; 13(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 11669564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What are the features of high-performing quality improvement collaboratives? A qualitative case study of a state-wide collaboratives programme.
    McGowan JG; Martin GP; Krapohl GL; Campbell DA; Englesbe MJ; Dimick JB; Dixon-Woods M
    BMJ Open; 2023 Dec; 13(12):e076648. PubMed ID: 38097243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of a safety improvement intervention in care homes in England: a participatory qualitative study.
    Marshall M; Pfeifer N; de Silva D; Wei L; Anderson J; Cruickshank L; Attreed-James K; Shand J
    J R Soc Med; 2018 Nov; 111(11):414-421. PubMed ID: 30235053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilising theories of change to understand the engagement of general practitioners in service improvement: a formative evaluation of the Lewisham Depression Programme.
    Riley AJ; Byng R; White C; Smith S
    Qual Prim Care; 2008; 16(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 18700075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What patients do and their impact on implementation.
    Boaz A; Robert G; Locock L; Sturmey G; Gager M; Vougioukalou S; Ziebland S; Fielden J
    J Health Organ Manag; 2016; 30(2):258-78. PubMed ID: 27052625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A qualitative evaluation of the barriers and facilitators toward implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist across hospitals in England: lessons from the "Surgical Checklist Implementation Project".
    Russ SJ; Sevdalis N; Moorthy K; Mayer EK; Rout S; Caris J; Mansell J; Davies R; Vincent C; Darzi A
    Ann Surg; 2015 Jan; 261(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 25072435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of quality improvement collaboratives in general practice: a qualitative systematic review.
    Knight AW; Tam CWM; Dennis S; Fraser J; Pond D
    BMJ Open Qual; 2022 May; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 35589275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. (Dis)Integrated Care? Lessons from East London.
    Bussu S; Marshall M
    Int J Integr Care; 2020 Oct; 20(4):2. PubMed ID: 33177965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.