122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29628633)
1. Dosimetric Comparison of Treatment Plans Using Physical Wedge and Enhanced Dynamic Wedge for the Planning of Breast Radiotherapy.
Gopalakrishnan Z; Nair RK; Raghukumar P; Sarin B
J Med Phys; 2018; 43(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 29628633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Poster - Thur Eve - 60: Physical and dynamic wedges in radiotherapy for rectal cancer: A dosimetric comparison.
Isa M; Iqbal K; Afzal M; Buzdar S; Chow J
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7Part3):4636. PubMed ID: 28516699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of physical and enhanced dynamic wedges.
Saminathan S; Manickam R; Supe SS
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2011; 17(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 24376991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimated Risk of Radiation Induced Contra Lateral Breast Cancer Following Chest Wall Irradiation by Conformal Wedge Field and Forward Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Technique for Post-Mastectomy Breast Cancer Patients.
Athiyaman H; m A; Chougule A; Hs K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016 Dec; 17(12):5107-5111. PubMed ID: 28122442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of physical wedge and enhanced dynamic wedge in inhomogeneous medium using Monte Carlo simulations.
Mahdavi SR; Mahmoudi A; Geraily G; Mostaar A; Esmaili G
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2021; 26(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 33948303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality.
Li Y; Rodrigues A; Li T; Yuan L; Yin FF; Wu QJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5137. PubMed ID: 25679172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiple machine implementation of enhanced dynamic wedge.
Klein EE; Gerber R; Zhu XR; Oehmke F; Purdy JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Mar; 40(4):977-85. PubMed ID: 9531384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between measured and calculated dynamic wedge dose distributions using the anisotropic analytic algorithm and pencil-beam convolution.
Caprile PF; Venencia CD; Besa P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 8(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 17592453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Poster - Thurs Eve-10: The accuracy of MU calculations for enhanced dynamic wedge with the Varian's anisotropic analytical algorithm.
Salomons G; Kerr A; Mei X; Patel D
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7Part2):3403. PubMed ID: 28512830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric evaluation of conventional radiotherapy, 3-D conformal radiotherapy and direct machine parameter optimisation intensity-modulated radiotherapy for breast cancer after conservative surgery.
Zhang F; Zheng M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2011 Dec; 55(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 22141607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric study of inverse-planed intensity modulated, forward-planned intensity modulated and conventional tangential techniques in breast conserving radiotherapy.
Rongsriyam K; Rojpornpradit P; Lertbutsayanukul C; Sanghangthum T; Oonsiri S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Oct; 91(10):1571-82. PubMed ID: 18972902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric Evaluation of Different Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Breast Cancer After Conservative Surgery.
Zhang F; Wang Y; Xu W; Jiang H; Liu Q; Gao J; Yao B; Hou J; He H
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 14(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 25311257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significant reductions in heart and lung doses using deep inspiration breath hold with active breathing control and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients treated with locoregional breast irradiation.
Remouchamps VM; Vicini FA; Sharpe MB; Kestin LL; Martinez AA; Wong JW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Feb; 55(2):392-406. PubMed ID: 12527053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 3D conformal breast radiation treatment plans using the anisotropic analytical algorithm and pencil beam convolution algorithm.
Yoo S; Wu Q; O'Daniel J; Horton J; Yin FF
Radiother Oncol; 2012 May; 103(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 22349127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SU-E-T-440: Dosimetry Parameter Comparison between Field-In-Field Technique and Conventional Physical Wedge Technique for Whole Breast Radiation Treatment.
Su M; Ayzenberg V; Li W
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part16):3806. PubMed ID: 28517232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges.
Ahmad M; Hussain A; Muhammad W; Rizvi SQ; Matiullah
J Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 35(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 20177568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the AAA Treatment Planning Algorithm for SBRT Lung Treatment: Comparison with Monte Carlo and Homogeneous Pencil Beam Dose Calculations.
Gete E; Teke T; Kwa W
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2012 Mar; 43(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 31052016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multienergetic verification of dynamic wedge angles in medical accelerators using multichannel linear array.
Kowalik A; Litoborski M
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2013; 18(4):220-34. PubMed ID: 24416557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
