These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29628884)
1. Subtle Distinctions: How Attentional Templates Influence EEG Parameters of Cognitive Control in a Spatial Cuing Paradigm. Mertes C; Schneider D Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():113. PubMed ID: 29628884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From Capture to Inhibition: How does Irrelevant Information Influence Visual Search? Evidence from a Spatial Cuing Paradigm. Mertes C; Wascher E; Schneider D Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():232. PubMed ID: 27242493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture. Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search. Grubert A; Eimer M J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attentional Templates Are Sharpened through Differential Signal Enhancement, Not Differential Allocation of Attention. Kerzel D; Cong SH J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 33(4):594-610. PubMed ID: 33464161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Capacity limitations in template-guided multiple color search. Kerzel D; Grubert A Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):901-909. PubMed ID: 34918268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Compliance instead of flexibility? On age-related differences in cognitive control during visual search. Mertes C; Wascher E; Schneider D Neurobiol Aging; 2017 May; 53():169-180. PubMed ID: 28262324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nogo Stimuli Do Not Receive More Attentional Suppression or Response Inhibition than Neutral Stimuli: Evidence from the N2pc, PD, and N2 Components in a Spatial Cueing Paradigm. Barras C; Kerzel D Front Psychol; 2016; 7():630. PubMed ID: 27199858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Role of Color in Search Templates for Real-world Target Objects. Nako R; Smith TJ; Eimer M J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 28(11):1714-1727. PubMed ID: 27315273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Guidance of visual search by negative attentional templates depends on task demands. Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jun; 48(6):653-664. PubMed ID: 35446088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner. Foerster RM; Schneider WX Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preserved Suppression of Salient Irrelevant Stimuli During Visual Search in Age-Associated Memory Impairment. Lorenzo-López L; Maseda A; Buján A; de Labra C; Amenedo E; Millán-Calenti JC Front Psychol; 2015; 6():2033. PubMed ID: 26793148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search. Berggren N; Eimer M J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects. Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A unitary focus of spatial attention during attentional capture: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Grubert A; Righi LL; Eimer M J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(3):9. PubMed ID: 23641076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]