These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29628884)

  • 1. Subtle Distinctions: How Attentional Templates Influence EEG Parameters of Cognitive Control in a Spatial Cuing Paradigm.
    Mertes C; Schneider D
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():113. PubMed ID: 29628884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From Capture to Inhibition: How does Irrelevant Information Influence Visual Search? Evidence from a Spatial Cuing Paradigm.
    Mertes C; Wascher E; Schneider D
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():232. PubMed ID: 27242493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional Templates Are Sharpened through Differential Signal Enhancement, Not Differential Allocation of Attention.
    Kerzel D; Cong SH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 33(4):594-610. PubMed ID: 33464161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Capacity limitations in template-guided multiple color search.
    Kerzel D; Grubert A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):901-909. PubMed ID: 34918268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compliance instead of flexibility? On age-related differences in cognitive control during visual search.
    Mertes C; Wascher E; Schneider D
    Neurobiol Aging; 2017 May; 53():169-180. PubMed ID: 28262324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nogo Stimuli Do Not Receive More Attentional Suppression or Response Inhibition than Neutral Stimuli: Evidence from the N2pc, PD, and N2 Components in a Spatial Cueing Paradigm.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():630. PubMed ID: 27199858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Role of Color in Search Templates for Real-world Target Objects.
    Nako R; Smith TJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 28(11):1714-1727. PubMed ID: 27315273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guidance of visual search by negative attentional templates depends on task demands.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jun; 48(6):653-664. PubMed ID: 35446088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preserved Suppression of Salient Irrelevant Stimuli During Visual Search in Age-Associated Memory Impairment.
    Lorenzo-López L; Maseda A; Buján A; de Labra C; Amenedo E; Millán-Calenti JC
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():2033. PubMed ID: 26793148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A unitary focus of spatial attention during attentional capture: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Grubert A; Righi LL; Eimer M
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(3):9. PubMed ID: 23641076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Taking a closer look at visual search: Just how feature-agnostic is singleton detection mode?
    Harris AM; Jacoby O; Remington RW; Travis SL; Mattingley JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):654-665. PubMed ID: 30603988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative differences in the guidance of attention during single-color and multiple-color visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1433-42. PubMed ID: 23244044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):357-371. PubMed ID: 29943810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain and Cognitive Mechanisms of Top-Down Attentional Control in a Multisensory World: Benefits of Electrical Neuroimaging.
    Matusz PJ; Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Murray MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 31(3):412-430. PubMed ID: 30513045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.