These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 296294)

  • 1. Comparison of mandible between normal occlusion and Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion samples. (A cephalometric study).
    Khatri VT; Modi AB; Parikh NH
    J Indian Orthod Soc; 1977; 9(2):7-20. PubMed ID: 296294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cephalometric evaluation of tongue from the rest position to centric occlusion in the subjects with class II division 1 malocclusion and class I normal occlusion.
    Verma SK; Tandon P; Agrawal DK; Prabhat KC
    J Orthod Sci; 2012 Apr; 1(2):34-9. PubMed ID: 24987623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Preliminary investigation about incisor inclination and dental compensation of normal occlusion and angle's class II division 1 malocclusion with different growth patterns].
    Zhou L; Zhou L; Wu H; Li J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 28(5):492-4. PubMed ID: 21179681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of condylar positions in centric relation and centric occlusion in pre-treatment malocclusion cases.
    Afzal A; Shameem A
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Oct; 15(10):620-3. PubMed ID: 19810300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric analysis: comparisons between maximum intercuspation and centric relation.
    Williamson EH; Caves SA; Edenfield RJ; Morse PK
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Dec; 74(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 281875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relation between centric slide and Angle's classification.
    Afzal A; Qamruddin I
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Aug; 15(8):481-4. PubMed ID: 16202359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can 'articulare' be used in the cephalometric analysis of mandibular length? A methodologic study.
    Stickel A; Pancherz H
    Eur J Orthod; 1988 Nov; 10(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 3208849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Centric slide in different Angle's classes of occlusion.
    Čimić S; Badel T; Šimunković SK; Pavičin IS; Ćatić A
    Ann Anat; 2016 Jan; 203():47-51. PubMed ID: 26434757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Assessment of Facial Asymmetry in Malocclusion using Posteroanterior View.
    Sahu A; Lall R; Nezam S; Singh R; Kumar SB; Ayub FB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):712-718. PubMed ID: 29959301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation on the difference in Vordere Asthöhe between the sexes and among normal occlusion, Class II division 1 malocclusion, and true-Class III malocclusion].
    Aoshima O; Arima H
    Nichidai Koko Kagaku; 1987 Sep; 13(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 3506125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of malocclusion in MPDS.
    Varma KP; Reddy RB; Kishore Reddy SN; Rao SR; Neela PK; V N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Sep; 14(5):939-43. PubMed ID: 24685801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pathognomonic cephalometric characteristics of Angle Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Brezniak N; Arad A; Heller M; Dinbar A; Dinte A; Wasserstein A
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Jun; 72(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 12071609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cephalometric appraisal of cases of Angle's Class II, Division I malocclusion treated by the Andresen appliance.
    Parkhouse RC
    Dent Pract Dent Rec; 1969 Aug; 19(12):425-33. PubMed ID: 5257260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence of muscle role over the cranio-facial skull development in Angle's Class III dental malocclusion under the clinical rest position.
    Gomes AC; Vitti M; Regalo SC; Semprini M; Siéssere S; Watanabe PC; Palomari ET
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2008; 48(8):335-41. PubMed ID: 19097473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cephalometric comparison between class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion.
    Godiawala RN; Joshi MR
    Angle Orthod; 1974 Jul; 44(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 4527603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of the relationship between rest position of the mandible and malocclusion.
    Sperry TP
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 2774298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of the differences between the dento-facial patterns associated with Class II division 1 malocclusion and normal occlusion.
    Patel HM; Joshi MR
    J Indian Orthod Soc; 1977; 9(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 296290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class II Division 2 malocclusion: a heritable pattern of small teeth in well-developed jaws.
    Peck S; Peck L; Kataja M
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Feb; 68(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 9503130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Condylar asymmetry measurements in patients with an Angle's Class III malocclusion.
    Miller VJ; Bodner L
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Mar; 24(3):247-9. PubMed ID: 9131483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The preliminary analysis on the changes of the oral functional space in Class II division 1 malocclusion after triggered by functional appliance].
    Zhao Z; Lü D; Zhou L; Zhao M; Song J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Aug; 18(4):259-61. PubMed ID: 12539538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.