These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29629616)

  • 21. Between two stools: preclinical research, reproducibility, and statistical design of experiments.
    Reynolds PS
    BMC Res Notes; 2022 Feb; 15(1):73. PubMed ID: 35189946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Threshold-dependent sample sizes for selenium assessment with stream fish tissue.
    Hitt NP; Smith DR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Jan; 11(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 25208918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sufficient Sample Size and Power in Multilevel Ordinal Logistic Regression Models.
    Ali S; Ali A; Khan SA; Hussain S
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():7329158. PubMed ID: 27746826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Statistical Primer for Athletic Trainers: Understanding the Role of Statistical Power in Comparative Athletic Training Research.
    Lininger MR; Riemann BL
    J Athl Train; 2018 Jul; 53(7):716-719. PubMed ID: 30192680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of methods commonly used in biomedicine for treatment versus control comparison of very small samples.
    Ristić-Djurović JL; Ćirković S; Mladenović P; Romčević N; Trbovich AM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Apr; 157():153-162. PubMed ID: 29477424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The significance of non-significance.
    Berry EM; Coustère-Yakir C; Grover NB
    QJM; 1998 Sep; 91(9):647-53. PubMed ID: 10024920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Consequences of relying on statistical significance: Some illustrations.
    Van Calster B; Steyerberg EW; Collins GS; Smits T
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2018 May; 48(5):e12912. PubMed ID: 29438579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A simple model suggesting economically rational sample-size choice drives irreproducibility.
    Braganza O
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229615. PubMed ID: 32160229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Formal sample size calculation and its limited validity in animal studies of medical basic research].
    Mayer B; Muche R
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2013; 41(6):367-74. PubMed ID: 24326876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The place of experimental design and statistics in the 3Rs.
    Parker RM; Browne WJ
    ILAR J; 2014; 55(3):477-85. PubMed ID: 25541549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sample size determination in medical and surgical research.
    Flikkema RM; Toledo-Pereyra LH
    J Invest Surg; 2012 Feb; 25(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 22272631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A systematic approach to designing statistically powerful heteroscedastic 2 × 2 factorial studies while minimizing financial costs.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):114. PubMed ID: 27578357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Why negative meta-analyses may be false?
    Hajek T; Kopecek M; Alda M; Uher R; Höschl C
    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2013 Oct; 23(10):1307-9. PubMed ID: 23402721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
    Senn S; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Benefits of a factorial design focusing on inclusion of female and male animals in one experiment.
    Buch T; Moos K; Ferreira FM; Fröhlich H; Gebhard C; Tresch A
    J Mol Med (Berl); 2019 Jun; 97(6):871-877. PubMed ID: 30980104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Explorations in statistics: statistical facets of reproducibility.
    Curran-Everett D
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Jun; 40(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 27231259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Experimental design, power and sample size for animal reproduction experiments.
    Chapman PL; Seidel GE
    Reprod Fertil Dev; 2008; 20(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 18154696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Caution regarding the choice of standard deviations to guide sample size calculations in clinical trials.
    Chen H; Zhang N; Lu X; Chen S
    Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 23794405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The importance of a priori sample size estimation in strength and conditioning research.
    Beck TW
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Aug; 27(8):2323-37. PubMed ID: 23880657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Logical Experimental Design and Execution in the Biomedical Sciences.
    Holder DJ; Marino MJ
    Curr Protoc Pharmacol; 2017 Mar; 76():A.3G.1-A.3G.26. PubMed ID: 28306153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.