These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
970 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29630483)
1. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation. Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach. Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials. Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns. Dolev E; Bitterman Y; Meirowitz A J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems. Hamza TA; Sherif RM J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns. Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 3-dimensional accuracy analysis of chairside CAD/CAM milling processes. Bosch G; Ender A; Mehl A J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1425-31. PubMed ID: 24993373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of scanner, powder application, and adjustments on CAD-CAM crown misfit. Prudente MS; Davi LR; Nabbout KO; Prado CJ; Pereira LM; Zancopé K; Neves FD J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28689912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns. Kale E; Yilmaz B; Seker E; Özcelik TB J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras. de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro evaluation of marginal fit zirconia crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM dental laboratory and a milling center. Meirowitz A; Bitterman Y; Levy S; Mijiritsky E; Dolev E BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):103. PubMed ID: 31196041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Micro-CT Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Crown and Inlay Restorations Fabricated Via Different Digital Scanners belonging to the Same CAD-CAM System. Ekici Z; Kılıçarslan MA; Bilecenoğlu B; Ocak M Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(3):381–389. PubMed ID: 33751000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of partially crystallized versus fully crystallized zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate CAD-CAM crowns: An in vitro comparison of the silicone replica technique, direct view, and 3-dimensional superimposition analysis. El-Ashkar A; Taymour M; El-Tannir A J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):769-776. PubMed ID: 34479719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique. Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single crowns manufactured with an analog workflow and three CAD-CAM systems: A prospective clinical study. Sanchez-Lara A; Hosney S; Lampraki E; Conejo J; Blatz MB; Barmak AB; Ercoli C; Chochlidakis K J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):689-696. PubMed ID: 36883776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD/CAM systems. Kirsch C; Ender A; Attin T; Mehl A Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):551-558. PubMed ID: 27469100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Over Reverse Tapered Preparations. Carbajal Mejía JB; Yatani H; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e477-e484. PubMed ID: 29194841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of occlusal contact errors of 6 chairside CAD/CAM crowns: a self-controlled clinical study. Pan Y; Lin H; Wang Y; Jiang L; Cheng Y; Yu H; Cheng H Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Mar; 27(3):1301-1310. PubMed ID: 36333533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]