These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29630575)

  • 1. A comparison of manual anthropometric measurements with Kinect-based scanned measurements in terms of precision and reliability.
    Bragança S; Arezes P; Carvalho M; Ashdown SP; Castellucci I; Leão C
    Work; 2018; 59(3):325-339. PubMed ID: 29630575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation study of a Kinect based body imaging system.
    Bragança S; Arezes P; Carvalho M; Ashdown SP; Xu B; Castellucci I
    Work; 2017; 57(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 28506007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated anthropometric phenotyping with novel Kinect-based three-dimensional imaging method: comparison with a reference laser imaging system.
    Soileau L; Bautista D; Johnson C; Gao C; Zhang K; Li X; Heymsfield SB; Thomas D; Zheng J
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2016 Apr; 70(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 26373966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mobile phone applications for 3-dimensional scanning and digital anthropometry: a precision comparison with traditional scanners.
    Tinsley GM; Rodriguez C; Siedler MR; Tinoco E; White SJ; LaValle C; Brojanac A; DeHaven B; Rasco J; Florez CM; Graybeal AJ
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2024 Jun; 78(6):509-514. PubMed ID: 38454153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability and repeatability of 3-D body scanner (LASS) measurements compared to anthropometry.
    Brooke-Wavell K; Jones PR; West GM
    Ann Hum Biol; 1994; 21(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 7840496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A literature review of anthropometric studies of school students for ergonomics purposes: Are accuracy, precision and reliability being considered?
    Bravo G; Bragança S; Arezes PM; Molenbroek JFM; Castellucci HI
    Work; 2018; 60(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29843294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of periocular anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry.
    Guo Y; Rokohl AC; Schaub F; Hou X; Liu J; Ruan Y; Jia R; Koch KR; Heindl LM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 257(11):2517-2531. PubMed ID: 31407036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of Periocular Anthropometry: A Comparison of Direct, 2-Dimensional, and 3-Dimensional Techniques.
    Guo Y; Hou X; Rokohl AC; Jia R; Heindl LM
    Dermatol Surg; 2020 Sep; 46(9):e23-e31. PubMed ID: 31809350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Body surface assessment with 3D laser-based anthropometry: reliability, validation, and improvement of empirical surface formulae.
    Kuehnapfel A; Ahnert P; Loeffler M; Scholz M
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2017 Feb; 117(2):371-380. PubMed ID: 28130628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical Report on the Modification of 3-Dimensional Non-contact Human Body Laser Scanner for the Measurement of Anthropometric Dimensions: Verification of its Accuracy and Precision.
    Jafari Roodbandi AS; Naderi H; Hashenmi-Nejad N; Choobineh A; Baneshi MR; Feyzi V
    J Lasers Med Sci; 2017; 8(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 28912940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1052-9. PubMed ID: 23102842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A collaborative, mixed-methods evaluation of a low-cost, handheld 3D imaging system for child anthropometry.
    Conkle J; Keirsey K; Hughes A; Breiman J; Ramakrishnan U; Suchdev PS; Martorell R
    Matern Child Nutr; 2019 Apr; 15(2):e12686. PubMed ID: 30194911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional facial anthropometry of unilateral cleft lip infants with a structured light scanning system.
    Li G; Wei J; Wang X; Wu G; Ma D; Wang B; Liu Y; Feng X
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Aug; 66(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 23664802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A protocol for evaluating the accuracy of 3D body scanners.
    Kouchi M; Mochimaru M; Bradtmiller B; Daanen H; Li P; Nacher B; Nam Y
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4010-7. PubMed ID: 22317336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional surface models of the facial soft tissues acquired with a low-cost scanner.
    Maués CPR; Casagrande MVS; Almeida RCC; Almeida MAO; Carvalho FAR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 47(9):1219-1225. PubMed ID: 29705405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Body Scanner and Manual Anthropometric Measurements of Body Shape: A Systematic Review.
    Rumbo-Rodríguez L; Sánchez-SanSegundo M; Ferrer-Cascales R; García-D'Urso N; Hurtado-Sánchez JA; Zaragoza-Martí A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(12):. PubMed ID: 34201258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.
    Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Marazita ML
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 15352857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a Structured Light Scanner for 3D Facial Imaging: A Comparative Study with Direct Anthropometry.
    Major M; Mészáros B; Würsching T; Polyák M; Kammerhofer G; Németh Z; Szabó G; Nagy K
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Aug; 24(16):. PubMed ID: 39204985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional surface scanners compared with standard anthropometric measurements for head shape.
    Beaumont CAA; Knoops PGM; Borghi A; Jeelani NUO; Koudstaal MJ; Schievano S; Dunaway DJ; Rodriguez-Florez N
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):921-927. PubMed ID: 28454666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
    Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.