225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29630583)
1. Stakeholders identify similar barriers but different strategies to facilitate return-to-work: A vignette of a worker with an upper extremity condition.
Peters SE; Truong AP; Johnston V
Work; 2018; 59(3):401-412. PubMed ID: 29630583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perspectives from Employers, Insurers, Lawyers and Healthcare Providers on Factors that Influence Workers' Return-to-Work Following Surgery for Non-Traumatic Upper Extremity Conditions.
Peters SE; Coppieters MW; Ross M; Johnston V
J Occup Rehabil; 2017 Sep; 27(3):343-358. PubMed ID: 27586696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determining return to work in a compensation setting: a review of New South Wales workplace rehabilitation service provider referrals over 5 years.
Casey PP; Guy L; Cameron ID
Work; 2014; 48(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 23531569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Getting the Message Right: Evidence-Based Insights to Improve Organizational Return-to-Work Communication Practices.
Jetha A; Le Pouésard M; Mustard C; Backman C; Gignac MAM
J Occup Rehabil; 2021 Sep; 31(3):652-663. PubMed ID: 33528732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health-care providers' perspectives on factors influencing return-to-work after surgery for nontraumatic conditions of the upper extremity.
Peters SE; Coppieters MW; Ross M; Johnston V
J Hand Ther; 2020; 33(1):87-95.e1. PubMed ID: 30857893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia.
Bunzli S; Singh N; Mazza D; Collie A; Kosny A; Ruseckaite R; Brijnath B
BMC Public Health; 2017 Apr; 17(1):313. PubMed ID: 28399837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Return to work following acquired brain injury: the views of patients and employers.
Donker-Cools BHPM; Schouten MJE; Wind H; Frings-Dresen MHW
Disabil Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 40(2):185-191. PubMed ID: 27830952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Healthcare providers' experience with the management of mental health conditions in the context of Workers' Compensation.
Schnitzler L; Kosny A; Lifshen M
Work; 2018; 59(3):449-462. PubMed ID: 29630586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Return-to-work challenges following a work-related mild TBI: The injured worker perspective.
Mansfield E; Stergiou-Kita M; Cassidy JD; Bayley M; Mantis S; Kristman V; Kirsh B; Gomez M; Jeschke MG; Vartanian O; Moody J; Colantonio A
Brain Inj; 2015; 29(11):1362-9. PubMed ID: 26287754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Workplace managers' view of the role of co-workers in return-to-work.
Dunstan DA; MacEachen E
Disabil Rehabil; 2016 Nov; 38(23):2324-33. PubMed ID: 27554071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Relationship Between Work-Disability Duration and Claimant's Expected Time to Return to Work as Recorded by Workers' Compensation Claims Managers.
Young AE; Besen E; Willetts J
J Occup Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 27(2):284-295. PubMed ID: 27460477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concerns About Claiming, Postclaim Support, and Return to Work Planning: The Workplace's Impact on Return to Work.
Gray SE; Sheehan LR; Lane TJ; Jetha A; Collie A
J Occup Environ Med; 2019 Apr; 61(4):e139-e145. PubMed ID: 30688764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insurers' perspective on barriers and facilitators for return to work after occupational injuries.
Robichaud MM; Truchon M; St-Arnaud L; Nastasia I
Work; 2019; 63(1):81-97. PubMed ID: 31127747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The association between rurality and return to work for workers' compensation claimants with work-related musculoskeletal injuries: An analysis of workers who failed to return to work within typical healing time frames.
Lavoie CA; Voaklander D; Beach JR; Gross DP
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 30(5):715-729. PubMed ID: 28584330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The experiences of workers who do not successfully return to work following a work-related injury.
Gewurtz RE; Premji S; Holness DL
Work; 2018; 61(4):537-549. PubMed ID: 30475782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Self-Efficacy on Return-to-Work Outcomes for Workers with Psychological or Upper-Body Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Review of the Literature.
Black O; Keegel T; Sim MR; Collie A; Smith P
J Occup Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 28(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 28271400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time to return to work following workplace violence among direct healthcare and social workers.
Choi K; Maas ET; Koehoorn M; McLeod CB
Occup Environ Med; 2020 Mar; 77(3):160-167. PubMed ID: 31959636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Appraisal of Washington State workers' compensation-based return-to-work programs and suggested system improvements: A survey of workers with permanent impairments.
Sears JM; Edmonds AT; MacEachen E; Fulton-Kehoe D
Am J Ind Med; 2021 Nov; 64(11):924-940. PubMed ID: 34462931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive value of the DASH tool for predicting return to work of injured workers with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity.
Armijo-Olivo S; Woodhouse LJ; Steenstra IA; Gross DP
Occup Environ Med; 2016 Dec; 73(12):807-815. PubMed ID: 27558703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The "toxic dose" of system problems: why some injured workers don't return to work as expected.
MacEachen E; Kosny A; Ferrier S; Chambers L
J Occup Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 20(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 20140752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
