These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29630983)

  • 1. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Linder BJ; Occhino JA; Habermann EB; Glasgow AE; Bews KA; Gershman B
    J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):862-867. PubMed ID: 29630983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.
    Linder BJ; Gershman B; Bews KA; Glasgow AE; Occhino JA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(5):342-346. PubMed ID: 30628947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
    Kisby CK; Occhino JA; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Linder BJ
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of 30-day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open sacrocolpopexy.
    Tyson MD; Wolter CE
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Feb; 34(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 24265258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.
    Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Racial and ethnic differences in reconstructive surgery for apical vaginal prolapse.
    Boyd BAJ; Winkelman WD; Mishra K; Vittinghoff E; Jacoby VL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):405.e1-405.e7. PubMed ID: 33984303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for treatment of multi-compartmental pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review.
    Ichikawa M; Kaseki H; Akira S
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2018 Feb; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 29485251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, and laparoscopic pectopexy for apical prolapse.
    Biler A; Ertas IE; Tosun G; Hortu I; Turkay U; Gultekin OE; Igci G
    Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(5):996-1004. PubMed ID: 30044591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National Assessment of Advancing Age on Perioperative Morbidity and Length of Stay Associated With Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Chaudhry Z; Cohen SA; Tarnay C
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(6):482-485. PubMed ID: 27636219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database.
    Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S
    Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Yadav GS; Gaddam N; Rahn DD
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 27(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 33620894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perioperative Morbidity of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Pereira J; Renzulli J; Pareek G; Moreira D; Guo R; Zhang Z; Amin A; Mega A; Golijanin D; Gershman B
    J Endourol; 2018 Feb; 32(2):116-123. PubMed ID: 29121786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes in 450 Women After Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Mueller MG; Jacobs KM; Mueller ER; Abernethy MG; Kenton KS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 27054799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is Same-Day Discharge Following Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Safe and Feasible? A National Contemporary Database Analysis.
    Raju R; Hanson KT; Habermann EB; Occhino JA; Linder BJ
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 28(7):414-420. PubMed ID: 35420549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
    Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
    J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.