These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29631438)

  • 21. Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.
    Borkowetz A; Bruendl J; Drerup M; Herrmann J; Isbarn H; Beyer B;
    World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):855-861. PubMed ID: 29427005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Extended vs standard lymph node dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer: a propensity-score-matching analysis.
    Kim KH; Lim SK; Kim HY; Shin TY; Lee JY; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
    BJU Int; 2013 Jul; 112(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 23356436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry.
    Ong WL; Evans SM; Spelman T; Kearns PA; Murphy DG; Millar JL
    BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 26573954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.
    Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Siriwardana AR; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Scheltema MJ; Stricker PD
    Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):664-671. PubMed ID: 29273404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of an educational program balancing surgeon training and surgical quality control during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Fujimura T; Menon M; Fukuhara H; Kume H; Suzuki M; Yamada Y; Niimi A; Nakagawa T; Igawa Y; Homma Y
    Int J Urol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 26502293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patterns-of-care and health economic analysis of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Australian public health system.
    Basto M; Sathianathen N; Te Marvelde L; Ryan S; Goad J; Lawrentschuk N; Costello AJ; Moon DA; Heriot AG; Butler J; Murphy DG
    BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):930-9. PubMed ID: 26350758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of surgeon experience and bony pelvic dimensions on surgical performance and patient outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Chen J; Chu T; Ghodoussipour S; Bowman S; Patel H; King K; Hung AJ
    BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124(5):828-835. PubMed ID: 31265207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Extraperitoneal vs Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the Setting of Prior Abdominal or Pelvic Surgery.
    Horovitz D; Feng C; Messing EM; Joseph JV
    J Endourol; 2017 Apr; 31(4):366-373. PubMed ID: 28073298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Critical Analysis of the Learning Curve and Postlearning Curve Outcomes of Two Experience- and Volume-Matched Surgeons for Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Good DW; Stewart GD; Laird A; Stolzenburg JU; Cahill D; McNeill SA
    J Endourol; 2015 Aug; 29(8):939-47. PubMed ID: 25630790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcomes of Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the Morbidly Obese: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Agrawal V; Feng C; Joseph J
    J Endourol; 2015 Jun; 29(6):677-82. PubMed ID: 25347555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can We Accomplish Better Oncological Results with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy?
    Kural AR; Obek C; Doganca T
    J Endourol; 2017 Apr; 31(S1):S54-S58. PubMed ID: 28075160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M
    Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Utilization and impact of surgical technique on the performance of pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
    McGinley KF; Sun X; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 26667212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can we predict the development of symptomatic lymphocele following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection? Results from a tertiary referral Centre.
    Sforza S; Tellini R; Grosso AA; Zaccaro C; Viola L; Di Maida F; Mari A; Carini M; Minervini A; Masieri L
    Scand J Urol; 2020 Aug; 54(4):328-333. PubMed ID: 32588704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.
    Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Rasiah K; Stricker PD
    Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 24287319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence.
    Kadono Y; Ueno S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Takezawa Y; Nakashima K; Nohara T; Izumi K; Mizokami A; Gabata T; Namiki M
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 26352154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Australian single-surgeon series.
    Papachristos A; Basto M; Te Marvelde L; Moon D
    ANZ J Surg; 2015 Mar; 85(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 24730750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Augmented reality during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: expert robotic surgeons' on-the-spot insights after live surgery.
    Porpiglia F; Bertolo R; Amparore D; Checcucci E; Artibani W; Dasgupta P; Montorsi F; Tewari A; Fiori C;
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2018 Apr; 70(2):226-229. PubMed ID: 29611674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted vs open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a Cochrane systematic review.
    Ilic D; Evans SM; Allan CA; Jung JH; Murphy D; Frydenberg M
    BJU Int; 2018 Jun; 121(6):845-853. PubMed ID: 29063728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.