These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29631523)

  • 1. Interference Between Number Magnitude and Parity.
    Krajcsi A; Lengyel G; Laczkó Á
    Exp Psychol; 2018 Mar; 65(2):71-83. PubMed ID: 29631523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect.
    Nuerk HC; Iversen W; Willmes K
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jul; 57(5):835-63. PubMed ID: 15204120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The SNARC and MARC effects measured online: Large-scale assessment methods in flexible cognitive effects.
    Cipora K; Soltanlou M; Reips UD; Nuerk HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Aug; 51(4):1676-1692. PubMed ID: 30805864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands.
    Roettger TB; Domahs F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1231-48. PubMed ID: 25384199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) meets SPARC (spatial-pitch association of response codes): Automaticity and interdependency in compatibility effects.
    Weis T; Estner B; van Leeuwen C; Lachmann T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1366-83. PubMed ID: 26274895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of working memory load on the SNARC effect: Maybe tasks have a word to say.
    Deng Z; Chen Y; Zhu X; Li Y
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):428-441. PubMed ID: 27909981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. There's a SNARC in the Size Congruity Task.
    Weis T; Theobald S; Schmitt A; van Leeuwen C; Lachmann T
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1978. PubMed ID: 30450061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Embodied markedness of parity? Examining handedness effects on parity judgments.
    Huber S; Klein E; Graf M; Nuerk HC; Moeller K; Willmes K
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):963-77. PubMed ID: 25394996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Processing stage flexibility of the SNARC effect: Task relevance or magnitude relevance?
    Xiang X; Yan L; Fu S; Nan W
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1022999. PubMed ID: 36438366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. It does exist! A left-to-right spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect among native Hebrew speakers.
    Zohar-Shai B; Tzelgov J; Karni A; Rubinsten O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):719-728. PubMed ID: 28182477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing implicit and synaesthetic number-space associations: Visuospatial and verbal spatial-numerical associations of response codes.
    Jonas CN; Spiller MJ; Jansari A; Ward J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1262-73. PubMed ID: 24228728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The underlying number-space mapping among kindergarteners and its relation with early numerical abilities.
    Chan WW; Wong TT
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Aug; 148():35-50. PubMed ID: 27104240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of spatial representation of numbers: a study of the SNARC effect in Chinese children.
    Yang T; Chen C; Zhou X; Xu J; Dong Q; Chen C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Jan; 117():1-11. PubMed ID: 24121228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Loudness counts: Interactions between loudness, number magnitude, and space.
    Hartmann M; Mast FW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1305-1322. PubMed ID: 27109592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
    Patro K; Shaki S
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implicit and Explicit Number-Space Associations Differentially Relate to Interference Control in Young Adults With ADHD.
    Georges C; Hoffmann D; Schiltz C
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():775. PubMed ID: 29881363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reveals a dissociation between SNARC and MARC effects: Implication for the polarity correspondence account.
    Di Rosa E; Bardi L; Umiltà C; Masina F; Forgione M; Mapelli D
    Cortex; 2017 Aug; 93():68-78. PubMed ID: 28623718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Instructional Dependency of SNARC Effects Reveals Flexibility of the Space-Magnitude Association of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Magnitudes.
    Lee D; Chun J; Cho S
    Perception; 2016 May; 45(5):552-67. PubMed ID: 27151510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.