170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2963176)
1. Do heart valve bioprostheses degenerate for metabolic or mechanical reasons?
Gabbay S; Kadam P; Factor S; Cheung TK
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Feb; 95(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 2963176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.
Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Holographic interferometry and in vitro calcification: comparing pericardial versus porcine bioprostheses.
Deiwick M; Glasmacher B; Tjan DT; Reul H; von Bally G; Scheld HH
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jul; 7(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 9697065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A preliminary durability study of two types of low-profile pericardial bioprosthetic valves through the use of accelerated fatigue testing and flow characterization.
Schuster PR; Wagner JW
J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Feb; 23(2):207-22. PubMed ID: 2708409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fatigue-induced failure of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft in the mitral position. In vivo and in vitro correlation and a proposed classification.
Gabbay S; Bortolotti U; Wasserman F; Factor S; Strom J; Frater RW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jun; 87(6):836-44. PubMed ID: 6727407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors influencing calcification of cardiac bioprostheses in adolescent sheep.
Flameng W; Meuris B; Yperman J; De Visscher G; Herijgers P; Verbeken E
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Jul; 132(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 16798307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for aortic position.
Daebritz SH; Fausten B; Hermanns B; Schroeder J; Groetzner J; Autschbach R; Messmer BJ; Sachweh JS
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 15144993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biaxial strain distributions in explanted porcine bioprosthetic valves.
Adamczyk MM; Vesely I
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):688-95. PubMed ID: 12358406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses.
Brown ML; Schaff HV; Lahr BD; Mullany CJ; Sundt TM; Dearani JA; McGregor CG; Orszulak TA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):878-84; discussion 884. PubMed ID: 18374773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro calcification of pericardial bioprostheses.
Glasmacher B; Reul H; Schneppershoff S; Schreck S; Rau G
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jul; 7(4):415-8. PubMed ID: 9697064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Primary tissue failure of bioprostheses: new evidence from in vitro tests.
Deiwick M; Glasmacher B; Pettenazzo E; Hammel D; Castellón W; Thiene G; Reul H; Berendes E; Scheld HH
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 49(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 11339456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging to characterize the geometry of fatigued porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.
Smith DB; Sacks MS; Pattany PM; Schroeder R
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 9263876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathology of the Pericarbon bovine pericardial xenograft implanted in humans.
Valente M; Ius P; Bortolotti U; Talenti E; Bottio T; Thiene G
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 9587859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lack of durability of the Mitroflow valve does not affect survival.
Houel R; Le Besnerais P; Soustelle C; Kirsch M; Hillion ML; Loisance D
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jul; 8(4):368-74; discussion 374-5. PubMed ID: 10461235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves.
Thubrikar MJ; Deck JD; Aouad J; Nolan SP
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Jul; 86(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 6865456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Porcine aortic valve bioprostheses: morphologic and functional considerations.
Hilbert SL; Ferrans VJ
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1992; 2(2-3):99-112. PubMed ID: 10148319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
