168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29631992)
1. The Validity of Online Patient Ratings of Physicians: Analysis of Physician Peer Reviews and Patient Ratings.
McGrath RJ; Priestley JL; Zhou Y; Culligan PJ
Interact J Med Res; 2018 Apr; 7(1):e8. PubMed ID: 29631992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews.
Hao H; Zhang K
J Med Internet Res; 2016 May; 18(5):e108. PubMed ID: 27165558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The development of online doctor reviews in China: an analysis of the largest online doctor review website in China.
Hao H
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e134. PubMed ID: 26032933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparison of Online Physician Ratings and Internal Patient-Submitted Ratings from a Large Healthcare System.
Okike K; Uhr NR; Shin SYM; Xie KC; Kim CY; Funahashi TT; Kanter MH
J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2575-2579. PubMed ID: 31531811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review.
Daskivich TJ; Houman J; Fuller G; Black JT; Kim HL; Spiegel B
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Apr; 25(4):401-407. PubMed ID: 29025145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites].
Meszmer N; Jaegers L; Schöffski O; Emmert M
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():73-80. PubMed ID: 29331281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physicians' Earnings Do Not Affect Their Online Ratings.
Haffey SC; Hopman WM; Leveridge MJ
Front Public Health; 2020; 8():300. PubMed ID: 32733838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Gender, Soft Skills, and Patient Experience in Online Physician Reviews: A Large-Scale Text Analysis.
Dunivin Z; Zadunayski L; Baskota U; Siek K; Mankoff J
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e14455. PubMed ID: 32729844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of social media presence, age, and patient reported wait times on physician review websites for sports medicine surgeons.
Sama AJ; Matichak DP; Schiller NC; Li DJ; Donnally CJ; Damodar D; Cole BJ
J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2021 Oct; 21():101502. PubMed ID: 34350098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scope, Breadth, and Differences in Online Physician Ratings Related to Geography, Specialty, and Year: Observational Retrospective Study.
Liu JJ; Matelski JJ; Bell CM
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e76. PubMed ID: 29514775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.
Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chronic Pain Practices: An Evaluation of Positive and Negative Online Patient Reviews.
Orhurhu MS; Salisu B; Sottosanti E; Abimbola N; Urits I; Jones M; Viswanath O; Kaye AD; Simopoulos T; Orhurhu V
Pain Physician; 2019 Sep; 22(5):E477-E486. PubMed ID: 31561660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.
Gao GG; McCullough JS; Agarwal R; Jha AK
J Med Internet Res; 2012 Feb; 14(1):e38. PubMed ID: 22366336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Online reviews of 500 urologists.
Ellimoottil C; Hart A; Greco K; Quek ML; Farooq A
J Urol; 2013 Jun; 189(6):2269-73. PubMed ID: 23228385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Understanding Your Online Ratings: A Methodological Analysis Using Urogynecologists in the United States.
Huber SA; Priestley J; Kasabwala K; Gadidov B; Culligan P
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):193-197. PubMed ID: 30807427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Online doctor reviews: do they track surgeon volume, a proxy for quality of care?
Segal J; Sacopulos M; Sheets V; Thurston I; Brooks K; Puccia R
J Med Internet Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):e50. PubMed ID: 22491423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What Do Patients Think About Their Radiation Oncologists? An Assessment of Online Patient Reviews on Healthgrades.
Prabhu AV; Randhawa S; Clump D; Heron DE; Beriwal S
Cureus; 2018 Feb; 10(2):e2165. PubMed ID: 29644154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians' Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period.
Emmert M; Sauter L; Jablonski L; Sander U; Taheri-Zadeh F
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e275. PubMed ID: 28747292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
