These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29631992)

  • 21. Validity of Physician and Administrator Peer Review for Selecting Specialist Narrow Network Participants.
    Fuller G; Green J; Litt Deculus C; Black J; Weingarten S; Ramirez G; Spiegel B
    Popul Health Manag; 2019 Apr; 22(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 30070963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Physician rating websites: do radiologists have an online presence?
    Gilbert K; Hawkins CM; Hughes DR; Patel K; Gogia N; Sekhar A; Duszak R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Aug; 12(8):867-71. PubMed ID: 26250980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [German language physician rating sites].
    Strech D; Reimann S
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):e61-7. PubMed ID: 22189671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Understanding a Nonlinear Causal Relationship Between Rewards and Physicians' Contributions in Online Health Care Communities: Longitudinal Study.
    Wang JN; Chiu YL; Yu H; Hsu YT
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Dec; 19(12):e427. PubMed ID: 29269344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Online Reviews of American Urologists and Opportunities for Improvement.
    Khan HI; Franks NJ; Liu Q; Choi BY; Smith ER; Daskovich TJ; Liss MA
    Urol Pract; 2020 Nov; 7(6):474-480. PubMed ID: 37287182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bifurcation of Patient Reviews: An Analysis of Trends in Online Ratings.
    Devgan LL; Klein EJ; Fox S; Ozturk T
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Apr; 8(4):e2781. PubMed ID: 32440443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patient assessments and online ratings of quality care: a "wake-up call" for providers.
    Merrell JG; Levy BH; Johnson DA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Nov; 108(11):1676-85. PubMed ID: 24192941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance.
    Ramsey PG; Wenrich MD; Carline JD; Inui TS; Larson EB; LoGerfo JP
    JAMA; 1993 Apr; 269(13):1655-60. PubMed ID: 8240483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Association Between Physician Online Rating and Quality of Care.
    Okike K; Peter-Bibb TK; Xie KC; Okike ON
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Dec; 18(12):e324. PubMed ID: 27965191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
    Emmert M; Meszmer N; Sander U
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e254. PubMed ID: 27644135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Holliday AM; Kachalia A; Meyer GS; Sequist TD
    J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Jun; 32(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 28150098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Negative Online Patient Reviews in Headache Medicine.
    Evans RW
    Headache; 2018 Oct; 58(9):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 30362525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of the physician payments sunshine act on the patient experience and perception of care amongst neurosurgeons: A comparative study of online PRW ratings and industry payments.
    Hopkins B; Yamaguchi JT; Cloney MB; Shlobin NA; Dahdaleh NS
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Jan; 176():127-132. PubMed ID: 30557766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Online ratings of spinal deformity surgeons: analysis of 634 surgeons.
    Melone G; Brodell J; Hernandez C; Menga E; Balkissoon R; Liu X; Zhang J; Mesfin A
    Spine Deform; 2020 Feb; 8(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 31925764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Feasibility of hospital-based use of peer ratings to evaluate the performances of practicing physicians.
    Ramsey PG; Carline JD; Blank LL; Wenrich MD
    Acad Med; 1996 Apr; 71(4):364-70. PubMed ID: 8645402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Online Ratings and Reviews of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons.
    Velasco BT; Chien B; Kwon JY; Miller CP
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2020 Feb; 13(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 30795702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences in Online Consumer Ratings of Health Care Providers Across Medical, Surgical, and Allied Health Specialties: Observational Study of 212,933 Providers.
    Daskivich T; Luu M; Noah B; Fuller G; Anger J; Spiegel B
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e176. PubMed ID: 29743150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e13816. PubMed ID: 31350838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Negative Online Ratings of Joint Replacement Surgeons: An Analysis of 6,402 Reviews.
    Imbergamo C; Brzezinski A; Patankar A; Weintraub M; Mazzaferro N; Kayiaros S
    Arthroplast Today; 2021 Jun; 9():106-111. PubMed ID: 34189214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.