192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29632488)
1. Improving Docking Performance Using Negative Image-Based Rescoring.
Kurkinen ST; Niinivehmas S; Ahinko M; Lätti S; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
Front Pharmacol; 2018; 9():260. PubMed ID: 29632488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ligand-Enhanced Negative Images Optimized for Docking Rescoring.
Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jul; 23(14):. PubMed ID: 35887220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Getting Docking into Shape Using Negative Image-Based Rescoring.
Kurkinen ST; Lätti S; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Aug; 59(8):3584-3599. PubMed ID: 31290660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Practical Perspective: The Effect of Ligand Conformers on the Negative Image-Based Screening.
Ahinko M; Kurkinen ST; Niinivehmas SP; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jun; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 31174295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Negative Image-Based Rescoring: Using Cavity Information to Improve Docking Screening.
Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():141-154. PubMed ID: 33759125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of Cavity-Based Negative Images to Boost Docking Enrichment in Virtual Screening.
Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Feb; 62(4):1100-1112. PubMed ID: 35133138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Negative Image-Based Screening: Rigid Docking Using Cavity Information.
Postila PA; Kurkinen ST; Pentikäinen OT
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():125-140. PubMed ID: 33759124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual Screening Strategy to Identify Retinoic Acid-Related Orphan Receptor γt Modulators.
Jokinen EM; Niemeläinen M; Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Lätti S; Postila PA; Pentikäinen OT; Niinivehmas SP
Molecules; 2023 Apr; 28(8):. PubMed ID: 37110655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficient conformational sampling and weak scoring in docking programs? Strategy of the wisdom of crowds.
Chaput L; Mouawad L
J Cheminform; 2017 Jun; 9(1):37. PubMed ID: 29086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing assumptions and hypotheses for rescoring success in protein-ligand docking.
O'Boyle NM; Liebeschuetz JW; Cole JC
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Aug; 49(8):1871-8. PubMed ID: 19645429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fragment- and negative image-based screening of phosphodiesterase 10A inhibitors.
Jokinen EM; Postila PA; Ahinko M; Niinivehmas S; Pentikäinen OT
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2019 Oct; 94(4):1799-1812. PubMed ID: 31260165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.
Graves AP; Shivakumar DM; Boyce SE; Jacobson MP; Case DA; Shoichet BK
J Mol Biol; 2008 Mar; 377(3):914-34. PubMed ID: 18280498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Hybrid Docking and Machine Learning Approach to Enhance the Performance of Virtual Screening Carried out on Protein-Protein Interfaces.
Singh N; Villoutreix BO
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 36430841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ChemFlow_py: a flexible toolkit for docking and rescoring.
Monari L; Galentino K; Cecchini M
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2023 Nov; 37(11):565-572. PubMed ID: 37620503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between Virtual Screening Performance and Binding Site Descriptors of Protein Targets.
Shamsara J
Int J Med Chem; 2018; 2018():3829307. PubMed ID: 29545955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementation and evaluation of a docking-rescoring method using molecular footprint comparisons.
Balius TE; Mukherjee S; Rizzo RC
J Comput Chem; 2011 Jul; 32(10):2273-89. PubMed ID: 21541962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
