These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29632488)

  • 1. Improving Docking Performance Using Negative Image-Based Rescoring.
    Kurkinen ST; Niinivehmas S; Ahinko M; Lätti S; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Front Pharmacol; 2018; 9():260. PubMed ID: 29632488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ligand-Enhanced Negative Images Optimized for Docking Rescoring.
    Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jul; 23(14):. PubMed ID: 35887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Getting Docking into Shape Using Negative Image-Based Rescoring.
    Kurkinen ST; Lätti S; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Aug; 59(8):3584-3599. PubMed ID: 31290660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Practical Perspective: The Effect of Ligand Conformers on the Negative Image-Based Screening.
    Ahinko M; Kurkinen ST; Niinivehmas SP; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jun; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 31174295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Negative Image-Based Rescoring: Using Cavity Information to Improve Docking Screening.
    Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():141-154. PubMed ID: 33759125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimization of Cavity-Based Negative Images to Boost Docking Enrichment in Virtual Screening.
    Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Feb; 62(4):1100-1112. PubMed ID: 35133138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negative Image-Based Screening: Rigid Docking Using Cavity Information.
    Postila PA; Kurkinen ST; Pentikäinen OT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():125-140. PubMed ID: 33759124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Virtual Screening Strategy to Identify Retinoic Acid-Related Orphan Receptor γt Modulators.
    Jokinen EM; Niemeläinen M; Kurkinen ST; Lehtonen JV; Lätti S; Postila PA; Pentikäinen OT; Niinivehmas SP
    Molecules; 2023 Apr; 28(8):. PubMed ID: 37110655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient conformational sampling and weak scoring in docking programs? Strategy of the wisdom of crowds.
    Chaput L; Mouawad L
    J Cheminform; 2017 Jun; 9(1):37. PubMed ID: 29086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Building shape-focused pharmacophore models for effective docking screening.
    Moyano-Gómez P; Lehtonen JV; Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    J Cheminform; 2024 Aug; 16(1):97. PubMed ID: 39123240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing assumptions and hypotheses for rescoring success in protein-ligand docking.
    O'Boyle NM; Liebeschuetz JW; Cole JC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Aug; 49(8):1871-8. PubMed ID: 19645429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
    Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fragment- and negative image-based screening of phosphodiesterase 10A inhibitors.
    Jokinen EM; Postila PA; Ahinko M; Niinivehmas S; Pentikäinen OT
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2019 Oct; 94(4):1799-1812. PubMed ID: 31260165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.
    Graves AP; Shivakumar DM; Boyce SE; Jacobson MP; Case DA; Shoichet BK
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Mar; 377(3):914-34. PubMed ID: 18280498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Hybrid Docking and Machine Learning Approach to Enhance the Performance of Virtual Screening Carried out on Protein-Protein Interfaces.
    Singh N; Villoutreix BO
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 36430841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ChemFlow_py: a flexible toolkit for docking and rescoring.
    Monari L; Galentino K; Cecchini M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2023 Nov; 37(11):565-572. PubMed ID: 37620503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between Virtual Screening Performance and Binding Site Descriptors of Protein Targets.
    Shamsara J
    Int J Med Chem; 2018; 2018():3829307. PubMed ID: 29545955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.