BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29633724)

  • 1. Measurement of scattered and transmitted x-rays from intra-oral and panoramic dental x-ray equipment.
    Holroyd J
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Jun; 38(2):793-806. PubMed ID: 29633724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation protection in dental X-ray surgeries--still rooms for improvement.
    Hart G; Dugdale M
    Br Dent J; 2013 Mar; 214(6):E16. PubMed ID: 23519002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of dose-area product from panoramic radiography using a pencil ionization chamber: normalized data for the estimation of patient effective and organ doses.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Neratzoulakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):708-14. PubMed ID: 15124987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating head and neck tissue dose from x-ray scatter to physicians performing x-ray guided cardiovascular procedures: a phantom study.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA; Grams MP; Sturchio GM
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 27941226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation exposure and distribution measurements for three panoramic x-ray machines.
    Manson-Hing LR; Greer DF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1977 Aug; 44(2):313-21. PubMed ID: 268583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A more accurate and safer method for the measurement of scattered radiation in X-ray examination rooms.
    Nakamura T; Shoichi S; Takei Y; Kobayashi M; Cruz V; Kobayashi I; Asegawa S; Kato K
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 31873870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distribution of scattered radiation during intraoral radiography with the patient in supine position.
    Kuroyanagi K; Hayakawa Y; Fujimori H; Sugiyama T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jun; 85(6):736-41. PubMed ID: 9638710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The characteristics of dental X-ray fluoroscopic equipment 'DreamRay 60F'.
    Shin GS; Lee BR; Chang KH; Lee IJ; Lee W; Choi JH; Kim YH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Aug; 140(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 20554581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of scattered radiation dose received by medical staff during uterine artery embolization in the operating room.
    Chiang HW; Chiang HJ; Li JH; Tsang LL
    Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(S1):3-11. PubMed ID: 32364139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
    Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
    Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of stray radiation to the operator for five hand-held dental X-ray devices.
    Smith R; Tremblay R; Wardlaw GM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Jul; 48(5):20180301. PubMed ID: 30694078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of radiation exposure to operators of portable hand-held dental X-ray units.
    Leadbeatter J; Diffey J
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Jun; 44(2):377-385. PubMed ID: 33656689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scattered radiation doses absorbed by technicians at different distances from X-ray exposure: Experiments on prosthesis.
    Chiang HW; Liu YL; Chen TR; Chen CL; Chiang HJ; Chao SY
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1641-50. PubMed ID: 26405929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient and staff dosimetry during radiographic procedures in an intensive care unit.
    Fernández R; Moreno-Torres M; Contreras AM; Núñez MI; Guirado D; Peñas L
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Sep; 35(3):727-32. PubMed ID: 26344655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective doses in intraoral and panoramic dental radiology from dose-area product values.
    Looe HK; Eenboom F; Chofor N; Pfaffenberger A; Steinhoff M; Rühmann A; Poplawski A; Willborn K; Poppe B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 18550517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proposals for revised factors in intra-oral radiography shielding calculations.
    Worrall M; McVey S; Sutton DG
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Sep; 32(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 22809656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
    Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose area product reference levels in dental panoramic radiology.
    Tierris CE; Yakoumakis EN; Bramis GN; Georgiou E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 15266083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation protection measurements around a 12 MeV mobile dedicated IORT accelerator.
    Soriani A; Felici G; Fantini M; Paolucci M; Borla O; Evangelisti G; Benassi M; Strigari L
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):995-1003. PubMed ID: 20384235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.