These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29634840)
1. Early Tomographic Changes in the Eyes of Patients With Keratoconus. Shajari M; Jaffary I; Herrmann K; Grunwald C; Steinwender G; Mayer WJ; Kohnen T J Refract Surg; 2018 Apr; 34(4):254-259. PubMed ID: 29634840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification. Kamiya K; Ishii R; Shimizu K; Igarashi A Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 24457362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas. Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of machine learning classifiers using bilateral data from a Scheimpflug camera for identifying eyes with preclinical signs of keratoconus. Kovács I; Miháltz K; Kránitz K; Juhász É; Takács Á; Dienes L; Gergely R; Nagy ZZ J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Feb; 42(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 27026453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients. Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Yield of Display Modules of Corneal Tomography for Early Diagnosis of Corneal Ectasia. Vlasák O; Škorpíková J; Hlinomazová Z; Kalandrová V Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 74(5):175-183. PubMed ID: 31234630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of OPD-Scan and Pentacam Parameters for Early Keratoconus Detection. Donoso R; Rodríguez Á; Esteffan K; Lagos C; Aránguiz D; Hernández N Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jun; 226():235-242. PubMed ID: 33529586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients. Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Ozulken K; Ozyol E; Akıncı A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23820305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus. Awad EA; Abou Samra WA; Torky MA; El-Kannishy AM BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):186. PubMed ID: 28985735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variation in the Best Fit Sphere Radius of Curvature as a Test to Detect Keratoconus Progression on a Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomographer. Gupta N; Trindade BL; Hooshmand J; Chan E J Refract Surg; 2018 Apr; 34(4):260-263. PubMed ID: 29634841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection. Ambrósio R; Lopes BT; Faria-Correia F; Salomão MQ; Bühren J; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P J Refract Surg; 2017 Jul; 33(7):434-443. PubMed ID: 28681902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes. Wang YM; Chan TCY; Yu M; Jhanji V J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Indices in Distinguishing Between Normal, Very Asymmetric, and Bilateral Keratoconic Eyes. Herber R; Hasanli A; Lenk J; Vinciguerra R; Terai N; Pillunat LE; Raiskup F J Refract Surg; 2022 Jun; 38(6):364-372. PubMed ID: 35686712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in Posterior Corneal Features Between Normal Corneas and Subclinical Keratoconus. Golan O; Hwang ES; Lang P; Santhiago MR; Abulafia A; Touboul D; Krauthammer M; Smadja D J Refract Surg; 2018 Oct; 34(10):664-670. PubMed ID: 30296327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The false positive rates for detecting keratoconus and potential ectatic corneal conditions when evaluating astigmatic eyes with Scheimpflug Technology. Henriquez MA; Hadid M; Moctezuma C; Izquierdo L; Binder PS Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 32(5):2532-2546. PubMed ID: 35313744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Best Indicators for Detecting Keratoconus Progression in Children: A Report From the Shahroud Schoolchildren Eye Cohort Study. Hashemi H; Panahi P; Asgari S; Emamian MH; Mehravaran S; Fotouhi A Cornea; 2022 Apr; 41(4):450-455. PubMed ID: 35244625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Combined Scheimpflug and Spectral-Domain OCT Analysis. Hwang ES; Perez-Straziota CE; Kim SW; Santhiago MR; Randleman JB Ophthalmology; 2018 Dec; 125(12):1862-1871. PubMed ID: 30055838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiating Keratoconus and Corneal Warpage by Analyzing Focal Change Patterns in Corneal Topography, Pachymetry, and Epithelial Thickness Maps. Tang M; Li Y; Chamberlain W; Louie DJ; Schallhorn JM; Huang D Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jul; 57(9):OCT544-9. PubMed ID: 27482824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corneal topographic and tomographic analysis of fellow eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients using Pentacam. Bae GH; Kim JR; Kim CH; Lim DH; Chung ES; Chung TY Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 157(1):103-109.e1. PubMed ID: 24452012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Longitudinal Evaluation of the Progression of Keratoconus Using a Novel Progression Display. Kosekahya P; Caglayan M; Koc M; Kiziltoprak H; Tekin K; Atilgan CU Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Sep; 45(5):324-330. PubMed ID: 30724839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]