These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29634987)

  • 1. How category average reference points affect choice of sugary foods.
    Jahn S; Schuch-Haellmigk J; Dannewald T; Boztuğ Y
    Appetite; 2018 Jul; 126():201-209. PubMed ID: 29634987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sugar labeling: How numerical information of sugar content influences healthiness and tastiness expectations.
    Haasova S; Florack A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0223510. PubMed ID: 31682613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can point-of-sale nutrition information and health warnings encourage reduced preference for sugary drinks?: An experimental study.
    Scully M; Morley B; Wakefield M; Dixon H
    Appetite; 2020 Jun; 149():104612. PubMed ID: 31981587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Influence of the New US Nutrition Facts Label on Consumer Perceptions and Understanding of Added Sugars: A Randomized Controlled Experiment.
    Khandpur N; Rimm EB; Moran AJ
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2020 Feb; 120(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 32040398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choosing or rejecting a food item, does framing matter? And what has sugar to do with it!
    Reijnen E; Kühne SJ; Stöcklin M; Wolfe JM
    Appetite; 2019 Dec; 143():104410. PubMed ID: 31437472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Color Nutrition Information Paradox: Effects of Suggested Sugar Content on Food Cue Reactivity in Healthy Young Women.
    Potthoff J; Face A; Schienle A
    Nutrients; 2020 Jan; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 31991601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Natural Experiment: Using Immersive Technologies to Study the Impact of "All-Natural" Labeling on Perceived Food Quality, Nutritional Content, and Liking.
    Liu R; Hooker NH; Parasidis E; Simons CT
    J Food Sci; 2017 Mar; 82(3):825-833. PubMed ID: 28178361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference amounts utilised in front of package nutrition labelling; impact on product healthfulness evaluations.
    Raats MM; Hieke S; Jola C; Hodgkins C; Kennedy J; Wills J
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2015 May; 69(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 25351645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The types and aspects of front-of-pack food labelling schemes preferred by adults and children.
    Pettigrew S; Talati Z; Miller C; Dixon H; Kelly B; Ball K
    Appetite; 2017 Feb; 109():115-123. PubMed ID: 27894969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of the front-of-pack 5-colour nutrition label (5-CNL) on the nutritional quality of purchases: an experimental study.
    Julia C; Blanchet O; Méjean C; Péneau S; Ducrot P; Allès B; Fezeu LK; Touvier M; Kesse-Guyot E; Singler E; Hercberg S
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2016 Sep; 13(1):101. PubMed ID: 27645372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumer heterogeneity in sugar consumption with special reference to fat and cholesterol intake.
    Asirvatham J; McNamara PE
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2018 Feb; 69(1):108-116. PubMed ID: 28610456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two front-of-package nutrition labeling schemes, and their explanation, on consumers' perception of product healthfulness and food choice.
    Lundeberg PJ; Graham DJ; Mohr GS
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():548-556. PubMed ID: 29496604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers' responses to seven labelling formats.
    Watson WL; Kelly B; Hector D; Hughes C; King L; Crawford J; Sergeant J; Chapman K
    Appetite; 2014 Jan; 72():90-7. PubMed ID: 24126243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain food: bringing psychological insights to bear on modern nutrition labeling efforts.
    Szanyi JM
    Food Drug Law J; 2010; 65(1):159-84, iii. PubMed ID: 24475538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the impact of various menu labeling formats on parents' demand for fast-food kids' meals for their children: An experimental auction.
    Hobin E; Lillico H; Zuo F; Sacco J; Rosella L; Hammond D
    Appetite; 2016 Oct; 105():582-90. PubMed ID: 27317971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Organic milk preference: is it a matter of information?
    Scozzafava G; Gerini F; Boncinelli F; Contini C; Marone E; Casini L
    Appetite; 2020 Jan; 144():104477. PubMed ID: 31574269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do Health Claims and Front-of-Pack Labels Lead to a Positivity Bias in Unhealthy Foods?
    Talati Z; Pettigrew S; Dixon H; Neal B; Ball K; Hughes C
    Nutrients; 2016 Dec; 8(12):. PubMed ID: 27918426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of location and type of nutrition content claims (NCCs) on healthy food purchase intentions: findings from an experimental study.
    Li S; Liu P; Guo Y
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):589. PubMed ID: 32349716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.
    Hobin E; Bollinger B; Sacco J; Liebman E; Vanderlee L; Zuo F; Rosella L; L'abbe M; Manson H; Hammond D
    Milbank Q; 2017 Sep; 95(3):494-534. PubMed ID: 28895220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrating sensory evaluation in adaptive conjoint analysis to elaborate the conflicting influence of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes on food choice.
    Hoppert K; Mai R; Zahn S; Hoffmann S; Rohm H
    Appetite; 2012 Dec; 59(3):949-55. PubMed ID: 23000276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.