BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29635416)

  • 1. New Methods for Inferring the Distribution of Fitness Effects for INDELs and SNPs.
    Barton HJ; Zeng K
    Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Jun; 35(6):1536-1546. PubMed ID: 29635416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impact of Natural Selection on Short Insertion and Deletion Variation in the Great Tit Genome.
    Barton HJ; Zeng K
    Genome Biol Evol; 2019 Jun; 11(6):1514-1524. PubMed ID: 30924871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evolution of small insertions and deletions in the coding genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Chong Z; Zhai W; Li C; Gao M; Gong Q; Ruan J; Li J; Jiang L; Lv X; Hungate E; Wu CI
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Dec; 30(12):2699-708. PubMed ID: 24077769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method for inferring the rate of occurrence and fitness effects of advantageous mutations.
    Schneider A; Charlesworth B; Eyre-Walker A; Keightley PD
    Genetics; 2011 Dec; 189(4):1427-37. PubMed ID: 21954160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strong mutational bias toward deletions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome is compensated by selection.
    Leushkin EV; Bazykin GA; Kondrashov AS
    Genome Biol Evol; 2013; 5(3):514-24. PubMed ID: 23395983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring Accelerated Rates of Insertions and Deletions Independent of Rates of Nucleotide Substitution.
    Navarro Leija O; Varghese S; Han MV
    J Mol Evol; 2016 Oct; 83(3-4):137-146. PubMed ID: 27770175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mutational Landscape of Spontaneous Base Substitutions and Small Indels in Experimental
    Konrad A; Brady MJ; Bergthorsson U; Katju V
    Genetics; 2019 Jul; 212(3):837-854. PubMed ID: 31110155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strong heterogeneity in mutation rate causes misleading hallmarks of natural selection on indel mutations in the human genome.
    Kvikstad EM; Duret L
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Jan; 31(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 24113537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inference of Distribution of Fitness Effects and Proportion of Adaptive Substitutions from Polymorphism Data.
    Tataru P; Mollion M; Glémin S; Bataillon T
    Genetics; 2017 Nov; 207(3):1103-1119. PubMed ID: 28951530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inferring Rates and Length-Distributions of Indels Using Approximate Bayesian Computation.
    Levy Karin E; Shkedy D; Ashkenazy H; Cartwright RA; Pupko T
    Genome Biol Evol; 2017 May; 9(5):1280-1294. PubMed ID: 28453624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.
    Keightley PD; Eyre-Walker A
    Genetics; 2007 Dec; 177(4):2251-61. PubMed ID: 18073430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short indels are subject to insertion-biased gene conversion.
    Leushkin EV; Bazykin GA
    Evolution; 2013 Sep; 67(9):2604-13. PubMed ID: 24033170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protein insertions and deletions enabled by neutral roaming in sequence space.
    Tóth-Petróczy A; Tawfik DS
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Apr; 30(4):761-71. PubMed ID: 23315956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multilocus analyses reveal little evidence for lineage-wide adaptive evolution within major clades of soft pines (Pinus subgenus Strobus).
    Eckert AJ; Bower AD; Jermstad KD; Wegrzyn JL; Knaus BJ; Syring JV; Neale DB
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Nov; 22(22):5635-50. PubMed ID: 24134614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of models to infer the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations.
    Kousathanas A; Keightley PD
    Genetics; 2013 Apr; 193(4):1197-208. PubMed ID: 23341416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-nucleotide mutation rate increases close to insertions/deletions in eukaryotes.
    Tian D; Wang Q; Zhang P; Araki H; Yang S; Kreitman M; Nagylaki T; Hudson R; Bergelson J; Chen JQ
    Nature; 2008 Sep; 455(7209):105-8. PubMed ID: 18641631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inference of the distribution of fitness effects of mutations is affected by single nucleotide polymorphism filtering methods, sample size and population structure.
    Andersson BA; Zhao W; Haller BC; Brännström Å; Wang XR
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Oct; 23(7):1589-1603. PubMed ID: 37340611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dindel: accurate indel calls from short-read data.
    Albers CA; Lunter G; MacArthur DG; McVean G; Ouwehand WH; Durbin R
    Genome Res; 2011 Jun; 21(6):961-73. PubMed ID: 20980555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inferring Genome-Wide Correlations of Mutation Fitness Effects between Populations.
    Huang X; Fortier AL; Coffman AJ; Struck TJ; Irby MN; James JE; León-Burguete JE; Ragsdale AP; Gutenkunst RN
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Sep; 38(10):4588-4602. PubMed ID: 34043790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Polymorphism Analysis Reveals Reduced Negative Selection and Elevated Rate of Insertions and Deletions in Intrinsically Disordered Protein Regions.
    Khan T; Douglas GM; Patel P; Nguyen Ba AN; Moses AM
    Genome Biol Evol; 2015 Jun; 7(6):1815-26. PubMed ID: 26047845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.