These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29635558)

  • 1. Autofluorescence Imaging for Evaluating Debridement in Military and Trauma Wounds.
    Blumenthal E; Jeffery S
    Mil Med; 2018 Mar; 183(suppl_1):429-432. PubMed ID: 29635558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective randomised controlled trial of nanocrystalline silver dressing versus plain gauze as the initial post-debridement management of military wounds on wound microbiology and healing.
    Fries CA; Ayalew Y; Penn-Barwell JG; Porter K; Jeffery SL; Midwinter MJ
    Injury; 2014 Jul; 45(7):1111-6. PubMed ID: 24485549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of MolecuLight i:X device in acute hand trauma.
    Chew BJW; Griffin M; Butler PE; Mosahebi A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Jul; 73(7):1357-1404. PubMed ID: 32241745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Use of the MolecuLight i:X in Managing Burns: A Pilot Study.
    Blumenthal E; Jeffery SLA
    J Burn Care Res; 2018 Jan; 39(1):154-161. PubMed ID: 28448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bacterial flora of combat wounds from eastern Ukraine and time-specified changes of bacterial recovery during treatment in Ukrainian military hospital.
    Valentine KP; Viacheslav KM
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Apr; 10(1):152. PubMed ID: 28388920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of an imaging device at identifying the presence of bacteria in wounds at a plastic surgery outpatients clinic.
    Blackshaw EL; Jeffery SLA
    J Wound Care; 2018 Jan; 27(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 29333929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective clinical study on the efficacy of bacterial removal with mechanical debridement in and around chronic leg ulcers assessed with fluorescence imaging.
    Moelleken M; Jockenhöfer F; Benson S; Dissemond J
    Int Wound J; 2020 Aug; 17(4):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 32289211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of a bacterial fluorescence imaging device: wound measurement, bacterial detection and targeted debridement.
    Raizman R; Dunham D; Lindvere-Teene L; Jones LM; Tapang K; Linden R; Rennie MY
    J Wound Care; 2019 Dec; 28(12):824-834. PubMed ID: 31825778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of a bacterial fluorescence imaging device in an outpatient wound care clinic: a pilot study.
    Hurley CM; McClusky P; Sugrue RM; Clover JA; Kelly JE
    J Wound Care; 2019 Jul; 28(7):438-443. PubMed ID: 31295094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Point-of-care autofluorescence imaging for real-time sampling and treatment guidance of bioburden in chronic wounds: first-in-human results.
    DaCosta RS; Kulbatski I; Lindvere-Teene L; Starr D; Blackmore K; Silver JI; Opoku J; Wu YC; Medeiros PJ; Xu W; Xu L; Wilson BC; Rosen C; Linden R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0116623. PubMed ID: 25790480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wound bed preparation: ultrasonic-assisted debridement.
    Butcher G; Pinnuck L
    Br J Nurs; 2013 Mar 28-Apr 10; 22(6):S36, S38-43. PubMed ID: 23587975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Point-of-care fluorescence imaging predicts the presence of pathogenic bacteria in wounds: a clinical study.
    Rennie MY; Lindvere-Teene L; Tapang K; Linden R
    J Wound Care; 2017 Aug; 26(8):452-460. PubMed ID: 28795890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wound bed preparation 2012.
    Gary Sibbald R; Goodman L; Reneeka P
    J Cutan Med Surg; 2013 Oct; 17 Suppl 1():S12-22. PubMed ID: 24144252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Fluorescence Imaging for the Detection of Bacterial Burden in Wounds: Results from the 350-Patient Fluorescence Imaging Assessment and Guidance Trial.
    Le L; Baer M; Briggs P; Bullock N; Cole W; DiMarco D; Hamil R; Harrell K; Kasper M; Li W; Patel K; Sabo M; Thibodeaux K; Serena TE
    Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2021 Mar; 10(3):123-136. PubMed ID: 32870774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of bacteria in burn wounds with a novel handheld autofluorescence wound imaging device: a pilot study.
    Pijpe A; Ozdemir Y; Sinnige JC; Kwa KAA; Middelkoop E; Meij-de Vries A
    J Wound Care; 2019 Aug; 28(8):548-554. PubMed ID: 31393796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. pH in the bacteria-contaminated wound and its impact on clostridium histolyticum collagenase activity: implications for the use of collagenase wound debridement agents.
    Shi L; Ramsay S; Ermis R; Carson D
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2011; 38(5):514-21. PubMed ID: 21860332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Debrisoft is a wound debridement product, not a wound dressing.
    Browning A
    Nurs Stand; 2014 May; 28(36):35. PubMed ID: 24802464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aerosolized spread of bacteria and reduction of bacterial wound contamination with three different methods of surgical wound debridement: a pilot study.
    Sönnergren HH; Strömbeck L; Aldenborg F; Faergemann J
    J Hosp Infect; 2013 Oct; 85(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 24011441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective method to remove wound bacteria: comparison of various debridement modalities in an in vivo porcine model.
    Nusbaum AG; Gil J; Rippy MK; Warne B; Valdes J; Claro A; Davis SC
    J Surg Res; 2012 Aug; 176(2):701-7. PubMed ID: 22440935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Autolysis: mechanisms of action in the removal of devitalised tissue.
    Atkin L; Rippon M
    Br J Nurs; 2016 Nov; 25(20 Suppl):S40-S47. PubMed ID: 27834531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.