160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29635701)
1. Complications after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant incontinence surgery: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database study.
Clancy AA; Mallick R; Breau RH; Khalil H; Hickling DR
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Sep; 37(7):2234-2241. PubMed ID: 29635701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The incidence of transfusion and associated risk factors in pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Pandya LK; Lynch CD; Hundley AF; Nekkanti S; Hudson CO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):612.e1-612.e8. PubMed ID: 28709582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence.
Baessler K; Christmann-Schmid C; Maher C; Haya N; Crawford TJ; Brown J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD013108. PubMed ID: 30121956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of 30-day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open sacrocolpopexy.
Tyson MD; Wolter CE
Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Feb; 34(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 24265258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical epidemiological studies of women undergoing surgery for urogynaecological disorders.
Sørensen RG
Dan Med J; 2015 Oct; 62(10):B5154. PubMed ID: 26441398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Major postoperative complications following surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: a secondary database analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Erekson E; Murchison RL; Gerjevic KA; Meljen VT; Strohbehn K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):608.e1-608.e17. PubMed ID: 28578172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
Linder BJ; Occhino JA; Habermann EB; Glasgow AE; Bews KA; Gershman B
J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):862-867. PubMed ID: 29630983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Venous thromboembolism in reconstructive pelvic surgery.
Mueller MG; Pilecki MA; Catanzarite T; Jain U; Kim JY; Kenton K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):552.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25068557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concomitant Repair of Pelvic Floor Disorders in Women Undergoing Surgery for Gynecologic Malignancies.
Bochenska K; Mueller M; Geynisman-Tan J; Leader-Cramer A; Davé B; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Kenton K
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(5):362-364. PubMed ID: 29621040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Financial analysis of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair with concomitant hysterectomy.
El Haraki AS; Shepherd JP; Parker-Autry C; Matthews CA
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 May; 34(5):1121-1126. PubMed ID: 36729164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in Same-Day Discharge Rate After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy and Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Postoperative Complication Rates Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Kim EK; Hong CX; Harvie HS
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Mar; 28(3):e22-e28. PubMed ID: 35272328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perioperative complications following colpocleisis with and without concomitant vaginal hysterectomy.
Bochenska K; Leader-Cramer A; Mueller M; Davé B; Alverdy A; Kenton K
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1671-1675. PubMed ID: 28470415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prolapse repair in the elderly patient: contemporary trends and 30-day perioperative complications.
Drain A; Escobar C; Pape D
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2095-2100. PubMed ID: 32556849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of pelvic organ prolapse repair on detrusor overactivity in women following incontinence surgery: A multivariate analysis.
Virseda-Chamorro M; Salinas-Casado J; Tapia-Herrero AM; Pesquera L; Méndez-Rubio S; Esteban-Fuertes M; Resel-Forskelma L; Moreno-Sierra J
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Nov; 36(8):2083-2088. PubMed ID: 28244234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Western Australia: a population-based analysis of trends and peri-operative complications.
Hunt FJ; Holman CD; Einarsdottir K; Moorin RE; Tsokos N
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2031-8. PubMed ID: 23801484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating Postoperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator.
Boyd SS; O'Sullivan DM; Lasala C
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jun; 26(6):364-369. PubMed ID: 30896455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent rectopexy: peri-operative morbidity in a nationwide cohort.
Weinberg D; Qeadan F; McKee R; Rogers RG; Komesu YM
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Mar; 30(3):385-392. PubMed ID: 29971470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk factors for surgical site infection after posterior cervical spine surgery: an analysis of 5,441 patients from the ACS NSQIP 2005-2012.
Sebastian A; Huddleston P; Kakar S; Habermann E; Wagie A; Nassr A
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 26686605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
