262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29635704)
1. A cost-utility analysis of artificial urinary sphincter versus AdVance male sling in post prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: A publicly funded health care perspective.
Shamout S; Nazha S; Dragomir A; Campeau L
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Sep; 37(7):2195-2203. PubMed ID: 29635704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial urinary sphincter significantly better than fixed sling for moderate post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: a propensity score-matched study.
Sacco E; Gandi C; Marino F; Totaro A; Di Gianfrancesco L; Palermo G; Pierconti F; Racioppi M; Bassi P
BJU Int; 2021 Feb; 127(2):229-237. PubMed ID: 32744793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Male synthetic sling versus artificial urinary sphincter trial for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery (MASTER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Constable L; Cotterill N; Cooper D; Glazener C; Drake MJ; Forrest M; Harding C; Kilonzo M; MacLennan G; McCormack K; McDonald A; Mundy A; Norrie J; Pickard R; Ramsay C; Smith R; Wileman S; Abrams P;
Trials; 2018 Feb; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 29467024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The transobturator suburethral sling: a safe and effective option for all degrees of post prostatectomy urinary incontinence.
Sullivan JF; Stassen PN; Moran D; Bolton EM; Smyth LG; Browne CM; Forde JC; Tal R; Lynch TH
Can J Urol; 2018 Apr; 25(2):9268-9272. PubMed ID: 29680005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous cuff revision and placement of an AdVance male sling for persistent post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence initially managed with AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter.
Fuller TW; Ristau BT; Benoit RM
Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7507-9. PubMed ID: 25347378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Operative therapy for stress urinary incontinence in men--from sling to artificial sphincter].
Nyarangi-Dix J; Huber J; Haferkamp A; Hohenfellner M
Aktuelle Urol; 2011 Sep; 42(5):306-10. PubMed ID: 21769764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cost-effectiveness analysis of retropubic midurethral sling versus transobturator midurethral sling for female stress urinary incontinence.
Seklehner S; Laudano MA; Te AE; Kaplan SA; Chughtai B; Lee RK
Neurourol Urodyn; 2014 Nov; 33(8):1186-92. PubMed ID: 23946119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A national study of artificial urinary sphincter and male sling implantation after radical prostatectomy in England.
Dosanjh A; Baldwin S; Mytton J; King D; Trudgill N; Belal M; Patel P
BJU Int; 2020 Mar; 125(3):467-475. PubMed ID: 31755624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What if artificial urinary sphincter is not possible? Feasibility and effectiveness of ProACT for patients with persistent stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy treated by sling.
Munier P; Nicolas M; Tricard T; Droupy S; Costa P; Saussine C
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Jun; 39(5):1417-1422. PubMed ID: 32249971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost utility analysis of urethral bulking agents versus midurethral sling in stress urinary incontinence.
Kunkle CM; Hallock JL; Hu X; Blomquist J; Thung SF; Werner EF
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(3):154-9. PubMed ID: 25730435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical Treatment of Male Postprostatectomy Incontinence: Current Concepts.
Kretschmer A; Nitti V
Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Oct; 3(4-5):364-376. PubMed ID: 29174616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. To sling or not to sling at time of abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Richardson ML; Elliott CS; Shaw JG; Comiter CV; Chen B; Sokol ER
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1306-12. PubMed ID: 23524201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prior male sling does not affect outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter.
Chow PM; Agrawal-Patel S; Wood H; Angermeier K
BJU Int; 2024 May; 133(5):564-569. PubMed ID: 38243854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical treatment of post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence in adult men: Report from the 6th International Consultation on Incontinence.
Averbeck MA; Woodhouse C; Comiter C; Bruschini H; Hanus T; Herschorn S; Goldman HB
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Jan; 38(1):398-406. PubMed ID: 30350875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of an adjustable anchored single-incision mini-sling, Ajust(®) , with a standard mid-urethral sling, TVT-O(TM) : a health economic evaluation.
Boyers D; Kilonzo M; Mostafa A; Abdel-Fattah M
BJU Int; 2013 Dec; 112(8):1169-77. PubMed ID: 24053310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes following artificial sphincter implantation after prior unsuccessful male sling.
Lentz AC; Peterson AC; Webster GD
J Urol; 2012 Jun; 187(6):2149-53. PubMed ID: 22503016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complications of the AdVance transobturator male sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence.
Bauer RM; Mayer ME; May F; Gratzke C; Buchner A; Soljanik I; Bastian PJ; Stief CG; Gozzi C
Urology; 2010 Jun; 75(6):1494-8. PubMed ID: 20156654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of a Noninferiority Randomised Controlled Trial of Surgery for Men with Urodynamic Stress Incontinence After Prostate Surgery (MASTER).
Abrams P; Constable LD; Cooper D; MacLennan G; Drake MJ; Harding C; Mundy A; McCormack K; McDonald A; Norrie J; Ramsay C; Smith R; Cotterill N; Kilonzo M; Glazener C;
Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):812-823. PubMed ID: 33551297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgery Insight: surgical management of postprostatectomy incontinence--the artificial urinary sphincter and male sling.
Comiter CV
Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2007 Nov; 4(11):615-24. PubMed ID: 17982438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgimesh M-SLING(®) transobturator and prepubic four-arm urethral sling for post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: clinical prospective assessment at 24 months.
Le Portz B; Haillot O; Brouziyne M; Saussine C
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):966-75. PubMed ID: 26498009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
