These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
839 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29637403)
41. Machine Learning-Based Ensemble Classifiers for Anomaly Handling in Smart Home Energy Consumption Data. Kasaraneni PP; Venkata Pavan Kumar Y; Moganti GLK; Kannan R Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(23):. PubMed ID: 36502025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Fetal health status prediction based on maternal clinical history using machine learning techniques. Akbulut A; Ertugrul E; Topcu V Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():87-100. PubMed ID: 30119860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. An Ensemble Approach for the Prediction of Diabetes Mellitus Using a Soft Voting Classifier with an Explainable AI. Kibria HB; Nahiduzzaman M; Goni MOF; Ahsan M; Haider J Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of machine learning algorithms performance for the prediction of early multiple sclerosis from resting-state FMRI connectivity data. SaccĂ V; Sarica A; Novellino F; Barone S; Tallarico T; Filippelli E; Granata A; Chiriaco C; Bruno Bossio R; Valentino P; Quattrone A Brain Imaging Behav; 2019 Aug; 13(4):1103-1114. PubMed ID: 29992392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of machine learning and traditional classifiers in glaucoma diagnosis. Chan K; Lee TW; Sample PA; Goldbaum MH; Weinreb RN; Sejnowski TJ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):963-74. PubMed ID: 12214886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. PCA-based polling strategy in machine learning framework for coronary artery disease risk assessment in intravascular ultrasound: A link between carotid and coronary grayscale plaque morphology. Araki T; Ikeda N; Shukla D; Jain PK; Londhe ND; Shrivastava VK; Banchhor SK; Saba L; Nicolaides A; Shafique S; Laird JR; Suri JS Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 May; 128():137-58. PubMed ID: 27040838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A soft computing approach for diabetes disease classification. Nilashi M; Bin Ibrahim O; Mardani A; Ahani A; Jusoh A Health Informatics J; 2018 Dec; 24(4):379-393. PubMed ID: 30376769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Machine learning approach for predicting cardiovascular disease in Bangladesh: evidence from a cross-sectional study in 2023. Hossain S; Hasan MK; Faruk MO; Aktar N; Hossain R; Hossain K BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2024 Apr; 24(1):214. PubMed ID: 38632519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. An Aggregated Mutual Information Based Feature Selection with Machine Learning Methods for Enhancing IoT Botnet Attack Detection. Al-Sarem M; Saeed F; Alkhammash EH; Alghamdi NS Sensors (Basel); 2021 Dec; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 35009725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality in septic patients with diabetes. Qi J; Lei J; Li N; Huang D; Liu H; Zhou K; Dai Z; Sun C Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():1034251. PubMed ID: 36465642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Computer-aided diagnosis of psoriasis skin images with HOS, texture and color features: A first comparative study of its kind. Shrivastava VK; Londhe ND; Sonawane RS; Suri JS Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():98-109. PubMed ID: 26830378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cancer survival classification using integrated data sets and intermediate information. Kim S; Park T; Kon M Artif Intell Med; 2014 Sep; 62(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 24997860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Using machine learning models to improve stroke risk level classification methods of China national stroke screening. Li X; Bian D; Yu J; Li M; Zhao D BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Dec; 19(1):261. PubMed ID: 31822270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Early prediction of radiotherapy-induced parotid shrinkage and toxicity based on CT radiomics and fuzzy classification. Pota M; Scalco E; Sanguineti G; Farneti A; Cattaneo GM; Rizzo G; Esposito M Artif Intell Med; 2017 Sep; 81():41-53. PubMed ID: 28325604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Machine learning ensemble modelling to classify caesarean section and vaginal delivery types using Cardiotocography traces. Fergus P; Selvaraj M; Chalmers C Comput Biol Med; 2018 Feb; 93():7-16. PubMed ID: 29248699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Machine learning for improved pathological staging of prostate cancer: a performance comparison on a range of classifiers. Regnier-Coudert O; McCall J; Lothian R; Lam T; McClinton S; N'dow J Artif Intell Med; 2012 May; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 22206941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A comparison of rule-based and machine learning approaches for classifying patient portal messages. Cronin RM; Fabbri D; Denny JC; Rosenbloom ST; Jackson GP Int J Med Inform; 2017 Sep; 105():110-120. PubMed ID: 28750904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Preventing Heterotopic Ossification in Combat Casualties-Which Models Are Best Suited for Clinical Use? Alfieri KA; Potter BK; Davis TA; Wagner MB; Elster EA; Forsberg JA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2807-13. PubMed ID: 25917420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Healthcare Text Classification System and its Performance Evaluation: A Source of Better Intelligence by Characterizing Healthcare Text. Srivastava SK; Singh SK; Suri JS J Med Syst; 2018 Apr; 42(5):97. PubMed ID: 29654417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. An improved support vector machine-based diabetic readmission prediction. Cui S; Wang D; Wang Y; Yu PW; Jin Y Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Nov; 166():123-135. PubMed ID: 30415712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]